Global Research Progress on Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiology.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002858
Chukwuka Elendu, Nkechi P Ogwu, Alexander U Okatta, Eunice K Omeludike, Emmanuel C Ogelle, Babajide T Obidigbo, Mary C Joseph, Emmanuella I Osamuyi, Afeez O Ogidan, Klein A Jingwa, Abdul-Rahaman A Ottun, Mariam M F Eldorghamy, Tuvakbibi Gurbanova, Fathy E A E Soltan, Umesh Bhadana, Vaibhav S Nasre, Cyrus P Yadav, Rishabh Jaiswal
{"title":"Global Research Progress on Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiology.","authors":"Chukwuka Elendu, Nkechi P Ogwu, Alexander U Okatta, Eunice K Omeludike, Emmanuel C Ogelle, Babajide T Obidigbo, Mary C Joseph, Emmanuella I Osamuyi, Afeez O Ogidan, Klein A Jingwa, Abdul-Rahaman A Ottun, Mariam M F Eldorghamy, Tuvakbibi Gurbanova, Fathy E A E Soltan, Umesh Bhadana, Vaibhav S Nasre, Cyrus P Yadav, Rishabh Jaiswal","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become a cornerstone in treating cardiac arrhythmias, offering a minimally invasive approach to managing conditions such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and other rhythm disorders. The historical evolution of RFA, from its early inception to its current state, underscores the technological advancements that have significantly enhanced its efficacy and safety. Global trends indicate a steady increase in the adoption of RFA, with notable research contributions from North America, Europe, and Asia. Comparative studies reveal outcome variability driven by differences in patient populations, procedural techniques, and healthcare infrastructures. Despite its success, RFA faces challenges, including complications related to the procedure, patient selection, and long-term efficacy. Emerging technologies, such as integrating artificial intelligence and enhanced imaging modalities, hold promise for overcoming these barriers and further refining the procedure. Gaps in current research are identified, particularly in understanding the long-term outcomes of RFA and its application in complex arrhythmias. The critical role of RFA in modern cardiology is emphasized, along with the potential for future innovations that could expand its therapeutic utility. This synthesis of the latest evidence provides valuable insights for optimizing the use of RFA in managing cardiac arrhythmias.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 2","pages":"725-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become a cornerstone in treating cardiac arrhythmias, offering a minimally invasive approach to managing conditions such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and other rhythm disorders. The historical evolution of RFA, from its early inception to its current state, underscores the technological advancements that have significantly enhanced its efficacy and safety. Global trends indicate a steady increase in the adoption of RFA, with notable research contributions from North America, Europe, and Asia. Comparative studies reveal outcome variability driven by differences in patient populations, procedural techniques, and healthcare infrastructures. Despite its success, RFA faces challenges, including complications related to the procedure, patient selection, and long-term efficacy. Emerging technologies, such as integrating artificial intelligence and enhanced imaging modalities, hold promise for overcoming these barriers and further refining the procedure. Gaps in current research are identified, particularly in understanding the long-term outcomes of RFA and its application in complex arrhythmias. The critical role of RFA in modern cardiology is emphasized, along with the potential for future innovations that could expand its therapeutic utility. This synthesis of the latest evidence provides valuable insights for optimizing the use of RFA in managing cardiac arrhythmias.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球心脏病射频消融研究进展。
射频消融(RFA)已成为治疗心律失常的基石,为治疗房颤、室性心动过速和其他心律失常等疾病提供了微创方法。RFA的历史演变,从其早期开始到现在的状态,强调了技术进步,大大提高了其有效性和安全性。全球趋势表明,RFA的采用稳步增加,北美、欧洲和亚洲的研究贡献显著。比较研究揭示了患者群体、程序技术和医疗基础设施差异导致的结果差异。尽管RFA取得了成功,但仍面临着挑战,包括与手术、患者选择和长期疗效相关的并发症。新兴技术,如集成人工智能和增强成像模式,有望克服这些障碍,并进一步完善程序。指出了目前研究的空白,特别是在了解RFA的长期结果及其在复杂心律失常中的应用方面。强调RFA在现代心脏病学中的关键作用,以及未来创新的潜力,可以扩大其治疗用途。这一最新证据的综合为优化RFA在心律失常治疗中的应用提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic role of Ki-67 expression in distinguishing thyroid follicular carcinoma from follicular adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Long-term safety and effectiveness of hybrid coronary revascularization compared to conventional revascularization strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Assessing photo-specific social media, body dissatisfaction, anxiety, and depression: a nationwide cross-sectional study on adolescents and young adults. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for GERD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes. Epigenomic excision for proteus nevus lipomatosis, rare PTEN overgrowth, and robotic debulking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1