Efficacy of a higher-flexibility duodenal stent for palliation of gastric outlet obstruction.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-03-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2539-9270
Noa Eveline Adriana Kapteijn, Pauline A Zellenrath, Peter Siersema, Agnes N Reijm, Lydi Van Driel, Pieter J F de Jonge, Wim J Lammers, Judith Honing, Manon C W Spaander
{"title":"Efficacy of a higher-flexibility duodenal stent for palliation of gastric outlet obstruction.","authors":"Noa Eveline Adriana Kapteijn, Pauline A Zellenrath, Peter Siersema, Agnes N Reijm, Lydi Van Driel, Pieter J F de Jonge, Wim J Lammers, Judith Honing, Manon C W Spaander","doi":"10.1055/a-2539-9270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Duodenal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a common palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction symptoms (GOOS). The higher flexibility of the WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent aims to ease stent placement and reduce adverse events (AE). This descriptive study compared the WallFlex Soft stent with other duodenal SEMS designs with regard to efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients receiving the WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent as first-line treatment for GOOS were included in a prospective cohort (2019-2023). A retrospective cohort (1998-2019) with patients treated with other duodenal SEMS designs as first-line treatment for GOOS was used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prospective cohort, 11 patients were treated with the WallFlex Duodenal Soft, achieving 100% technical and 82% clinical success rates. The retrospective cohort of 147 patients with various types of duodenal SEMS showed 97% technical and 86% clinical success. For the WallFlex Duodenal Soft vs. the other duodenal SEMS, the overall survival was 101 vs. 82 days and median symptom-free survival was 83 vs. 28 days. AE rates were 18% vs. 28%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent effectively treats GOOS in palliative patients and seems to be associated with longer symptom-free survival and lower AE rates compared with previous duodenal SEMS designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25399270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2539-9270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Duodenal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a common palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction symptoms (GOOS). The higher flexibility of the WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent aims to ease stent placement and reduce adverse events (AE). This descriptive study compared the WallFlex Soft stent with other duodenal SEMS designs with regard to efficacy and safety.

Patients and methods: Patients receiving the WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent as first-line treatment for GOOS were included in a prospective cohort (2019-2023). A retrospective cohort (1998-2019) with patients treated with other duodenal SEMS designs as first-line treatment for GOOS was used for comparison.

Results: In the prospective cohort, 11 patients were treated with the WallFlex Duodenal Soft, achieving 100% technical and 82% clinical success rates. The retrospective cohort of 147 patients with various types of duodenal SEMS showed 97% technical and 86% clinical success. For the WallFlex Duodenal Soft vs. the other duodenal SEMS, the overall survival was 101 vs. 82 days and median symptom-free survival was 83 vs. 28 days. AE rates were 18% vs. 28%, respectively.

Conclusions: The WallFlex Duodenal Soft stent effectively treats GOOS in palliative patients and seems to be associated with longer symptom-free survival and lower AE rates compared with previous duodenal SEMS designs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高弹性十二指肠支架治疗胃出口梗阻的疗效观察。
背景与研究目的:十二指肠自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)置入术是恶性胃出口梗阻(GOOS)常见的姑息性治疗方法。WallFlex十二指肠软支架具有较高的灵活性,旨在缓解支架放置并减少不良事件(AE)。这项描述性研究比较了WallFlex软支架与其他十二指肠SEMS设计的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:接受WallFlex十二指肠软支架作为GOOS一线治疗的患者纳入前瞻性队列(2019-2023)。采用回顾性队列(1998-2019),将其他十二指肠SEMS设计作为GOOS一线治疗方案的患者进行比较。结果:在前瞻性队列中,11例患者接受了WallFlex十二指肠软垫治疗,技术成功率为100%,临床成功率为82%。147例不同类型十二指肠SEMS患者的回顾性队列显示97%的技术成功率和86%的临床成功率。WallFlex Duodenal Soft与其他十二指肠SEMS相比,总生存期为101天对82天,中位无症状生存期为83天对28天。AE的发生率分别为18%和28%。结论:与以前的十二指肠SEMS设计相比,WallFlex十二指肠软支架有效地治疗了姑息性GOOS患者,似乎与更长的无症状生存期和更低的AE发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
Is size, morphology, site, and access scoring system consistent between endoscopists? Interobserver and intraobserver polyp assessment study. Lymph node metastases in early gastric cancer: Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines can be used for endoscopic resection in the West. Endoscopic stricturotomy for axis-related gastric outlet obstruction following sleeve gastrectomy. Biliary stents reshape the bile microbiome in the absence of cholangitis. Clinical feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients on glucocorticoids or immunomodulators: Propensity-score-matched study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1