{"title":"Enhanced Drug Effect With Cutting Balloon Followed by Drug Coated Balloon in a Rabbit Model.","authors":"Manabu Shiozaki, Sho Torii, Yu Sato, Kazuki Aihara, Yuki Matsumoto, Norihito Nakamura, Daiki Suzuki, Ayako Yoshikawa, Yuji Ikari, Gaku Nakazawa","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-coated balloon (DCB) are effective treatment options for patients with coronary artery disease and using of scoring or cutting balloon before the DCB usage were recommended. However, the effectiveness of lesion preparation with cutting balloons (CB) followed by DCB (CB + DCB) has not been evaluated before.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the current study was to compare the biological effect of various types of balloon angioplasty in a healthy rabbit iliac artery model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each of the four kinds of treatments as balloon angioplasty (BA), CB alone, DCB alone, and CB + DCB were performed in the healthy iliac arteries of 12 rabbits, which were euthanized after 14 days. The treated iliac arteries were sequentially cut, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Movat Pentachrome, and histopathologically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The depth of medial smooth muscle cell (SMC) loss score, an indicator of drug effect, was highest with CB + DCB, followed by DCB, CB, and BA (CB + DCB vs. DCB vs. CB vs. BA: 3.83 (3.67-4.00) vs. 3.17 (2.67-3.67), 1.67 (1.67-2.08) vs. 1.50 (1.00-1.67), p < 0.0001). The angle with severe SMC loss was also the highest with CB + DCB group, followed by DCB group, CB group, and BA group (123.7 (104.5-132.2) vs. 52.1 (34.7-100.6), 0.0 (0.0-14.2) vs. 0.0 (0.0-0.0), respectively, p < 0.0001), suggesting a higher drug effect in CB + DCB compared with DCB alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The drug effect of DCB was enhanced when CB was used before DCB treatment, suggesting the effectiveness of the combination therapy of CB and DCB.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) are effective treatment options for patients with coronary artery disease and using of scoring or cutting balloon before the DCB usage were recommended. However, the effectiveness of lesion preparation with cutting balloons (CB) followed by DCB (CB + DCB) has not been evaluated before.
Aims: The aim of the current study was to compare the biological effect of various types of balloon angioplasty in a healthy rabbit iliac artery model.
Methods: Each of the four kinds of treatments as balloon angioplasty (BA), CB alone, DCB alone, and CB + DCB were performed in the healthy iliac arteries of 12 rabbits, which were euthanized after 14 days. The treated iliac arteries were sequentially cut, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Movat Pentachrome, and histopathologically evaluated.
Results: The depth of medial smooth muscle cell (SMC) loss score, an indicator of drug effect, was highest with CB + DCB, followed by DCB, CB, and BA (CB + DCB vs. DCB vs. CB vs. BA: 3.83 (3.67-4.00) vs. 3.17 (2.67-3.67), 1.67 (1.67-2.08) vs. 1.50 (1.00-1.67), p < 0.0001). The angle with severe SMC loss was also the highest with CB + DCB group, followed by DCB group, CB group, and BA group (123.7 (104.5-132.2) vs. 52.1 (34.7-100.6), 0.0 (0.0-14.2) vs. 0.0 (0.0-0.0), respectively, p < 0.0001), suggesting a higher drug effect in CB + DCB compared with DCB alone.
Conclusions: The drug effect of DCB was enhanced when CB was used before DCB treatment, suggesting the effectiveness of the combination therapy of CB and DCB.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.