The modified 5-item frailty index in total hip arthroplasty patients: a retrospective cohort from a low-middle income country.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05505-9
Usman Ali, Shahzil Abdur Rehman Malik, Bilal Iqbal, Aribah Bhatti, Sher Baz Khan, Shahryar Noordin, Anum Ali
{"title":"The modified 5-item frailty index in total hip arthroplasty patients: a retrospective cohort from a low-middle income country.","authors":"Usman Ali, Shahzil Abdur Rehman Malik, Bilal Iqbal, Aribah Bhatti, Sher Baz Khan, Shahryar Noordin, Anum Ali","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05505-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to rising rates of hip fractures and an aging population. Identifying frail patients at risk for postoperative complications is vital for improving outcomes. This study examines the utility of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) in predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in THA patients in resource-limited settings, where other models like the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) may be impractical due to data constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 498 patients undergoing THA at tertiary-care hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. Patients were stratified based on their mFI-5 scores (≤ 1 vs. > 1). Postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 498 patients, 62.8% had an mFI-5 score ≤ 1, and 37.2% had a score > 1. Complication rates were higher in the mFI-5 > 1 group (17.8%) versus the ≤ 1 group (9.6%). After adjusting for covariates, patients with mFI-5 > 1 had a 97% higher likelihood of complications (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.70). Each additional hospital day increased complication risk by 13% (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mFI-5 is a practical, efficient tool for predicting postoperative complications in THA patients, particularly in resource-limited environments. Its use in LMICs could improve preoperative planning, reduce complications, and provide better outcome estimates for patients and healthcare providers. Given the growing geriatric population, integrating the mFI-5 into routine THA planning could enhance patient care and resource allocation. Further research is needed to validate its use across larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05505-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to rising rates of hip fractures and an aging population. Identifying frail patients at risk for postoperative complications is vital for improving outcomes. This study examines the utility of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) in predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in THA patients in resource-limited settings, where other models like the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure (ECM) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) may be impractical due to data constraints.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 498 patients undergoing THA at tertiary-care hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. Patients were stratified based on their mFI-5 scores (≤ 1 vs. > 1). Postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess outcomes.

Results: Of the 498 patients, 62.8% had an mFI-5 score ≤ 1, and 37.2% had a score > 1. Complication rates were higher in the mFI-5 > 1 group (17.8%) versus the ≤ 1 group (9.6%). After adjusting for covariates, patients with mFI-5 > 1 had a 97% higher likelihood of complications (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.70). Each additional hospital day increased complication risk by 13% (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.21).

Conclusion: The mFI-5 is a practical, efficient tool for predicting postoperative complications in THA patients, particularly in resource-limited environments. Its use in LMICs could improve preoperative planning, reduce complications, and provide better outcome estimates for patients and healthcare providers. Given the growing geriatric population, integrating the mFI-5 into routine THA planning could enhance patient care and resource allocation. Further research is needed to validate its use across larger datasets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术患者的改良5项衰弱指数:来自中低收入国家的回顾性队列
背景:由于髋部骨折发生率上升和人口老龄化,全髋关节置换术(THA)在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)正在增加。识别有术后并发症风险的体弱患者对于改善预后至关重要。在资源有限的情况下,其他模型如Elixhauser共病测量(ECM)和Charlson共病指数(CCI)可能由于数据限制而不切实际,本研究检验了改良5项衰弱指数(mFI-5)在预测THA患者30天发病率和死亡率方面的效用。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年1月至2019年12月在三级医院接受THA治疗的498例患者。根据患者的mFI-5评分(≤1 vs. bbb1)对患者进行分层。比较两组患者术后并发症、住院时间和死亡率。采用多变量logistic回归评估结果。结果:498例患者中,62.8%的患者mFI-5评分≤1分,37.2%的患者mFI-5评分为bb0.1分。mFI-5 bbb1组的并发症发生率(17.8%)高于≤1组(9.6%)。调整协变量后,mFI-5 bbb1患者发生并发症的可能性高出97% (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.70)。每增加一个住院日,并发症风险增加13% (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.21)。结论:mFI-5是预测THA患者术后并发症的实用、有效工具,特别是在资源有限的环境中。在中低收入国家使用它可以改善术前计划,减少并发症,并为患者和医疗保健提供者提供更好的结果估计。鉴于老年人口的不断增长,将mFI-5纳入常规THA计划可以改善患者护理和资源分配。需要进一步的研究来验证它在更大的数据集上的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Polypropylene mesh reinforcement does not improve acute biomechanical properties in superior capsular reconstruction: an ovine model study. ​​Intramedullary versus crossed pinning for paediatric distal radius fractures: clinical decision patterns and biomechanical validation integrating real-world practice with growth plate stress finite element analysis. Correction: Association of dietary patterns with osteoporosis risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Comparison of articular-sided, bursal-sided, and intratendinous partial rotator cuff tears: outcomes of surgical repair from a multicenter cohort study. Detection of simulated complications in all-polymer PEEK knee prostheses: a cadaveric imaging study using Radiography, CT, and MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1