Professional benefits perception among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1539376
Jia Wang, Hui Wang, Xiuli Chen, Yu Sheng
{"title":"Professional benefits perception among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Jia Wang, Hui Wang, Xiuli Chen, Yu Sheng","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1539376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The perception of professional benefits is a critical determinant of job stability and work efficacy among healthcare professionals. This perception can directly influence patient care quality, nurse job satisfaction and retention, as well as overall organizational efficiency. The current understanding of how pediatric nurses perceive their professional benefits is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the status and determinants of professional benefit perception among pediatric nurses to inform evidence-based clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey of pediatric nurses at our hospital from September 1, 2024, to November 26, 2024. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Nurses' Professional benefit perception Scale was employed to assess professional benefit perception. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were utilized to identify factors influencing professional benefit perception. These statistical methods were chosen due to their suitability for examining relationships between continuous variables and for controlling potential confounding factors in the regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 366 pediatric nurses participated in the study. The mean score of professional benefit perception was (108.26 ± 17.32). Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between professional benefit perception scores and several demographic and professional variables. Specifically, age (<i>r</i> = 0.517), years of experience in pediatric nursing (<i>r</i> = 0.604), educational level (<i>r</i> = 0.564), professional title (<i>r</i> = 0.559), marital status (<i>r</i> = 0.623), and average monthly income (<i>r</i> = 0.647) were all significantly correlated with professional benefit perception scores. Further analysis using multiple linear regression identified these variables as significant predictors of professional benefit perception scores, collectively accounting for 57.20% of the variance (<i>R</i>² = 0.572). This indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in professional benefit perception can be explained by these demographic and professional factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceived level of professional benefits among pediatric nurses is found to be moderate. It is recommended that nursing administrators develop targeted intervention strategies based on the identified influencing factors. Such strategies may include enhancing professional development opportunities, improving financial compensation, and fostering a supportive work environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1539376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1539376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The perception of professional benefits is a critical determinant of job stability and work efficacy among healthcare professionals. This perception can directly influence patient care quality, nurse job satisfaction and retention, as well as overall organizational efficiency. The current understanding of how pediatric nurses perceive their professional benefits is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the status and determinants of professional benefit perception among pediatric nurses to inform evidence-based clinical care.

Methods: We conducted a survey of pediatric nurses at our hospital from September 1, 2024, to November 26, 2024. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Nurses' Professional benefit perception Scale was employed to assess professional benefit perception. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were utilized to identify factors influencing professional benefit perception. These statistical methods were chosen due to their suitability for examining relationships between continuous variables and for controlling potential confounding factors in the regression model.

Results: A total of 366 pediatric nurses participated in the study. The mean score of professional benefit perception was (108.26 ± 17.32). Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between professional benefit perception scores and several demographic and professional variables. Specifically, age (r = 0.517), years of experience in pediatric nursing (r = 0.604), educational level (r = 0.564), professional title (r = 0.559), marital status (r = 0.623), and average monthly income (r = 0.647) were all significantly correlated with professional benefit perception scores. Further analysis using multiple linear regression identified these variables as significant predictors of professional benefit perception scores, collectively accounting for 57.20% of the variance (R² = 0.572). This indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in professional benefit perception can be explained by these demographic and professional factors.

Conclusion: The perceived level of professional benefits among pediatric nurses is found to be moderate. It is recommended that nursing administrators develop targeted intervention strategies based on the identified influencing factors. Such strategies may include enhancing professional development opportunities, improving financial compensation, and fostering a supportive work environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Clinical value of Beery visual-motor integration and Beery VMI supplemental tests in Chinese preschoolers: a modified replication cross-sectional study. Bibliometric analysis of Crohn's disease in children, 2014-2024. Clinical characteristics of patients with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors: a monocentric retrospective analysis. Hypoxemia detection and oxygen therapy practices in neonatal and pediatric wards across seven district and referral hospitals in Rwanda. Twists and turns: spontaneous torsion of accessory liver lobe and gallbladder-diagnostic challenges and surgical interventions-a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1