Parenting Support Intervention During Pregnancy With a Life-Limiting Fetal Condition: A Pilot Study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.002
Denise Côté-Arsenault PhD, RN, CPCLC, FAAN , Samah Hawsawi PhD, RN , Erin Denney-Koelsch MD FAAHPM , Kathie Kobler PhD, APRN, PCNS-BC, CHPPN, FPCN, FAAN , Kimberly Spence MD
{"title":"Parenting Support Intervention During Pregnancy With a Life-Limiting Fetal Condition: A Pilot Study","authors":"Denise Côté-Arsenault PhD, RN, CPCLC, FAAN ,&nbsp;Samah Hawsawi PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Erin Denney-Koelsch MD FAAHPM ,&nbsp;Kathie Kobler PhD, APRN, PCNS-BC, CHPPN, FPCN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Kimberly Spence MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Standard care in the United States for parents with life-limiting fetal conditions (LLFC) focuses on medical decision-making through fetal care centers and perinatal palliative care (PPC) teams when accessible. There are no PPC interventions to optimize parents’ daily lived experiences during a LLFC pregnancy. We developed a novel, relationship-centered intervention, the Developmental Perinatal Parenting Intervention with Life-limiting Fetal Conditions (DPPI-LLFC), based on two theoretical frameworks and one concept, delivered separate from routine care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess whether the DPPI-LLFC is feasible and acceptable for the parents, interventionists, and research team. We also evaluate parents’ experience of the intervention components and completion of measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-arm pilot study of the DPPI-LLFC was delivered via telehealth. We trained 3 nurse interventionists (RN-Is) in the theoretical frameworks and intervention. Eligible participants were mothers continuing their LLFC pregnancy and their willing co-parents. RN-Is met with participants monthly throughout pregnancy and twice after birth. Participants completed mental health measures via online questionnaire. Fidelity was assessed across the study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>13 parents (8 mothers, 5 fathers) participated, with 92% retention. Intervention delivery via telehealth was feasible and acceptable by participants. Fidelity assessments resulted 100% inter-rater agreement; all DPPI-LLFC components were delivered as designed. Pregnancy anxiety decreased over pregnancy and participants reported low-moderate decision regret and grief intensity by the study's end. Participants reported the intervention being “meaningful and appreciated.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The novel, telehealth-delivered DPPI-LLFC was feasible, acceptable, and valued by parents during their LLFC pregnancy. This intervention holds great promise for addressing PPC access and delivery challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 6","pages":"Pages 633-640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425005391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Standard care in the United States for parents with life-limiting fetal conditions (LLFC) focuses on medical decision-making through fetal care centers and perinatal palliative care (PPC) teams when accessible. There are no PPC interventions to optimize parents’ daily lived experiences during a LLFC pregnancy. We developed a novel, relationship-centered intervention, the Developmental Perinatal Parenting Intervention with Life-limiting Fetal Conditions (DPPI-LLFC), based on two theoretical frameworks and one concept, delivered separate from routine care.

Objectives

To assess whether the DPPI-LLFC is feasible and acceptable for the parents, interventionists, and research team. We also evaluate parents’ experience of the intervention components and completion of measures.

Methods

A single-arm pilot study of the DPPI-LLFC was delivered via telehealth. We trained 3 nurse interventionists (RN-Is) in the theoretical frameworks and intervention. Eligible participants were mothers continuing their LLFC pregnancy and their willing co-parents. RN-Is met with participants monthly throughout pregnancy and twice after birth. Participants completed mental health measures via online questionnaire. Fidelity was assessed across the study.

Results

13 parents (8 mothers, 5 fathers) participated, with 92% retention. Intervention delivery via telehealth was feasible and acceptable by participants. Fidelity assessments resulted 100% inter-rater agreement; all DPPI-LLFC components were delivered as designed. Pregnancy anxiety decreased over pregnancy and participants reported low-moderate decision regret and grief intensity by the study's end. Participants reported the intervention being “meaningful and appreciated.”

Conclusion

The novel, telehealth-delivered DPPI-LLFC was feasible, acceptable, and valued by parents during their LLFC pregnancy. This intervention holds great promise for addressing PPC access and delivery challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀孕期间的父母支持干预与限制生命的胎儿状况:一项试点研究。
背景:美国对生命受限胎儿状况(LLFC)父母的标准护理侧重于通过胎儿护理中心和围产期姑息治疗(PPC)团队进行医疗决策。没有PPC干预措施来优化父母在LLFC怀孕期间的日常生活体验。基于两个理论框架和一个概念,我们开发了一种新颖的、以关系为中心的干预措施,即发育性围产期育儿干预与生命限制胎儿状况(DPPI-LLFC),与常规护理分开提供。目的:评估DPPI-LLFC对家长、干预者和研究团队是否可行和可接受。我们还评估了家长对干预成分和措施完成情况的经验。方法:通过远程医疗进行DPPI-LLFC的单臂试点研究。我们培训了3名护理干预师(RN-Is)的理论框架和干预。符合条件的参与者是继续LLFC妊娠的母亲和她们愿意的共同父母。RN-Is在怀孕期间每月与参与者会面,并在出生后两次会面。参与者通过在线问卷完成心理健康测量。在整个研究过程中对忠实度进行了评估。结果:13名家长(母亲8名,父亲5名)参与,保留率92%。通过远程保健提供干预措施是可行的,并为参与者所接受。保真度评估结果是评级机构间100%的一致性;所有DPPI-LLFC组件均按设计交付。怀孕焦虑在怀孕期间有所下降,研究结束时,参与者报告了中低程度的决定后悔和悲伤强度。参与者报告说,这种干预是“有意义和值得赞赏的”。结论:新型远程分娩DPPI-LLFC是可行的、可接受的,并受到LLFC妊娠父母的重视。这一干预措施为解决PPC获取和提供方面的挑战带来了巨大希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
PC-FACS February 3, 2026. Factors indicating cancer-related neuropathic pain relief by corticosteroids administration. Distinct trajectories of symptom burden development in patients with stage IV cancer. Trajectories of Goals of Care among Patients with Advanced Cancer in the Last Two Years of Life. PC-FACS November 3, 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1