Effects of the Nudge Theory-Based Multifaceted Intervention on Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09460-3
Chun-Xing Li, Shuo Liang, Yin-Shi Xu, Si-Meng Gu, Chun-Xia Man, Xin-Ying Mao, Jia-Yi Li, Yu-Qiao Wang, Li-Chaoyue Sun, Yue Qiao, Gui-Bin Yang, Qing Xie, Ling-Yan Gao, Ju-Qi Zhang, Yue Wang, Hua Liu, Zhao Ren
{"title":"Effects of the Nudge Theory-Based Multifaceted Intervention on Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Chun-Xing Li, Shuo Liang, Yin-Shi Xu, Si-Meng Gu, Chun-Xia Man, Xin-Ying Mao, Jia-Yi Li, Yu-Qiao Wang, Li-Chaoyue Sun, Yue Qiao, Gui-Bin Yang, Qing Xie, Ling-Yan Gao, Ju-Qi Zhang, Yue Wang, Hua Liu, Zhao Ren","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09460-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for prophylaxis among hospitalized patients continues to be a significant issue. Previous interventions have often been ineffective and lack evaluation of their longer-term impacts.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the clinical and economic effects of a nudge theory-based multifaceted intervention on reducing inappropriate PPI prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized controlled study was carried out in a teaching hospital's wards from January 2021 to June 2023, with a 12-month pre-intervention period, a 12-month intervention period (including the first and second stages of intervention), and a post-intervention period with 6-month follow-up. The intervention, based on nudge theory, was implemented among 114 doctors across 10 wards, sequentially involved peer comparison, information provision, and face-to-face feedback. The outcomes were assessed by randomly selecting cases of adult patients who received at least one PPI treatment during hospitalization, and the statistical analysis included univariate analysis, and multivariate and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1782 patients, with a median age of 61 years. During and after intervention, the rate of appropriate PPI use significantly increased by 2.83- to 5.47-fold, rising from 23.82% (147/617) to 46.96% (139/296) after the first stage, to 63.13% (202/320) after the second stage, and remained at 53.01% (291/549) later on. The rate of PPI injections decreased from 92.54 to 74.13-84.12%, the median defined daily doses from 16 to 7-12, and PPI-related expenditures from 484.80 to 156.00-262.99 CNY per-patient. The cost associated with inappropriate PPI use dropped from 161.60 to 0-45.58 CNY per-patient. Subgroup analyses supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A nudge theory-based multifaceted intervention led to increased appropriate PPI use, decreased PPI injections, and cost savings, with benefits lasting at least 6 months post-intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09460-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for prophylaxis among hospitalized patients continues to be a significant issue. Previous interventions have often been ineffective and lack evaluation of their longer-term impacts.

Aim: This study aims to assess the clinical and economic effects of a nudge theory-based multifaceted intervention on reducing inappropriate PPI prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.

Methods: This non-randomized controlled study was carried out in a teaching hospital's wards from January 2021 to June 2023, with a 12-month pre-intervention period, a 12-month intervention period (including the first and second stages of intervention), and a post-intervention period with 6-month follow-up. The intervention, based on nudge theory, was implemented among 114 doctors across 10 wards, sequentially involved peer comparison, information provision, and face-to-face feedback. The outcomes were assessed by randomly selecting cases of adult patients who received at least one PPI treatment during hospitalization, and the statistical analysis included univariate analysis, and multivariate and subgroup analyses.

Results: The study included 1782 patients, with a median age of 61 years. During and after intervention, the rate of appropriate PPI use significantly increased by 2.83- to 5.47-fold, rising from 23.82% (147/617) to 46.96% (139/296) after the first stage, to 63.13% (202/320) after the second stage, and remained at 53.01% (291/549) later on. The rate of PPI injections decreased from 92.54 to 74.13-84.12%, the median defined daily doses from 16 to 7-12, and PPI-related expenditures from 484.80 to 156.00-262.99 CNY per-patient. The cost associated with inappropriate PPI use dropped from 161.60 to 0-45.58 CNY per-patient. Subgroup analyses supported these findings.

Conclusion: A nudge theory-based multifaceted intervention led to increased appropriate PPI use, decreased PPI injections, and cost savings, with benefits lasting at least 6 months post-intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Personal Cannabis Use in Physicians' Perceptions and Practices Regarding Medical Cannabis for Chronic Pain Management. Central Nervous System-Active Medication Use in Older Adults With and Without Dementia-A Retrospective Cohort Study. Effects of the Nudge Theory-Based Multifaceted Intervention on Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study. Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System. More on Food as Medicine: Critical Need for Effective Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1