Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol with multimodal analgesia incorporating transverse abdominis plane block after elective caesarean delivery: A randomised controlled trial

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102939
Vidushi Kulshrestha , Nisha , Richa Vatsa , Rajeshwari Subramaniam , Perumal Vanamail , Ajisha Aravindan , Vatsla Dadhwal
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol with multimodal analgesia incorporating transverse abdominis plane block after elective caesarean delivery: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Vidushi Kulshrestha ,&nbsp;Nisha ,&nbsp;Richa Vatsa ,&nbsp;Rajeshwari Subramaniam ,&nbsp;Perumal Vanamail ,&nbsp;Ajisha Aravindan ,&nbsp;Vatsla Dadhwal","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate ERAS protocol with multimodal analgesia incorporating transverse abdominis plane(TAP) block compared to routine postoperative care for pain control in women undergoing elective caesarean delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized study was conducted after ethical approval and CTRI registration (2020/10/028652). Total 140 women scheduled for elective caesarean were randomised into two groups. ERAS protocol was implemented in Group-1(n=70), and routine practice was followed in Group-2(n=70). Multimodal analgesia included TAP block after skin closure and intravenous paracetamol at shifting to recovery, followed by oral drugs as per analgesic clock. Outcomes were Pain Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) at rest and on movement at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and at readiness for discharge, and need for rescue analgesics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NRS was significantly less in group-1 at all time points at rest and movement. Mean±SD NRS at rest was 30.57±1.52 vs. 64.71±1.52 at 6 hours, 28.14±1.39 vs. 56.57±1.39 at 12 hours in group-1 vs. group-2 respectively; (P=0.001). NRS on mobilisation was 37.71±1.57 vs. 74.00±1.57 and 36.42±1.46 vs. 65.28±1.46 at 6 and 12 hours respectively, (P=0.001). Patients needing rescue analgesia were 30 % vs. 87.1 % within 6 hours(65 % reduction), in 24.3 % vs. 77.1 % between 6–12 hours, 4.3 % vs. 40 % between 12–24 hours in group-1 and 2 respectively; with no requirement after 48 hours in either group. The mean Likert score for satisfaction was 4.4±0.60 and 3.4±0.78 in group-1 and group-2, respectively, p&lt;0.001.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ERAS protocol incorporating TAP block was effective in reducing postoperative pain, with 65 % reduction in requirement of rescue analgesia within six hours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 5","pages":"Article 102939"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784725000364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate ERAS protocol with multimodal analgesia incorporating transverse abdominis plane(TAP) block compared to routine postoperative care for pain control in women undergoing elective caesarean delivery.

Methods

This randomized study was conducted after ethical approval and CTRI registration (2020/10/028652). Total 140 women scheduled for elective caesarean were randomised into two groups. ERAS protocol was implemented in Group-1(n=70), and routine practice was followed in Group-2(n=70). Multimodal analgesia included TAP block after skin closure and intravenous paracetamol at shifting to recovery, followed by oral drugs as per analgesic clock. Outcomes were Pain Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) at rest and on movement at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and at readiness for discharge, and need for rescue analgesics.

Results

NRS was significantly less in group-1 at all time points at rest and movement. Mean±SD NRS at rest was 30.57±1.52 vs. 64.71±1.52 at 6 hours, 28.14±1.39 vs. 56.57±1.39 at 12 hours in group-1 vs. group-2 respectively; (P=0.001). NRS on mobilisation was 37.71±1.57 vs. 74.00±1.57 and 36.42±1.46 vs. 65.28±1.46 at 6 and 12 hours respectively, (P=0.001). Patients needing rescue analgesia were 30 % vs. 87.1 % within 6 hours(65 % reduction), in 24.3 % vs. 77.1 % between 6–12 hours, 4.3 % vs. 40 % between 12–24 hours in group-1 and 2 respectively; with no requirement after 48 hours in either group. The mean Likert score for satisfaction was 4.4±0.60 and 3.4±0.78 in group-1 and group-2, respectively, p<0.001.

Conclusion

ERAS protocol incorporating TAP block was effective in reducing postoperative pain, with 65 % reduction in requirement of rescue analgesia within six hours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性剖宫产后多模式镇痛合并横腹平面阻滞的术后恢复(ERAS)方案:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价ERAS联合横腹面(TAP)阻滞多模式镇痛方案与常规术后护理对选择性剖宫产妇女疼痛控制的作用。方法:本研究经伦理审批和CTRI注册(2020/10/028652)后进行随机化研究。140名计划择期剖腹产的妇女被随机分为两组。第1组(n=70)采用ERAS治疗方案,第2组(n=70)采用常规治疗。多模式镇痛包括皮肤闭合后TAP阻滞和恢复时静脉注射扑热息痛,然后根据镇痛时钟口服药物。结果是6、12、24、48小时休息和运动时的疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)和出院准备时的疼痛评分,以及是否需要急救镇痛药。结果:1组在休息和运动各时间点NRS均明显降低。1组和2组休息时的平均±SD NRS分别为30.57±1.52和64.71±1.52;12小时时的28.14±1.39和56.57±1.39;(P = 0.001)。6小时和12小时活动时NRS分别为37.71±1.57∶74.00±1.57和36.42±1.46∶65.28±1.46 (P=0.001)。1组和2组6小时内需要抢救性镇痛的患者分别为30%和87.1%(减少65%),6-12小时内为24.3%和77.1%,12-24小时为4.3%和40%;两组48小时后均不需要。1组和2组患者满意度的平均Likert评分分别为4.4±0.60和3.4±0.78。结论:结合TAP阻滞的ERAS方案可有效减轻术后疼痛,6小时内救援镇痛需求减少65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Pregnancy chances and obstetrical outcomes after egg donation according to the maternal indication. Feasibility and clinical value of virtual reality based on 3D model in colorectal endometriosis for surgical planning. Developing an online calculator to estimate the overall survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with early-stage type II endometrial carcinoma. Effects of body fat percentage on hormonal profiles, metabolism and adipokine-related indicators in PCOS patients with a normal body mass index: A cross-sectional study. Comment on "Evaluating the Applicability of ESGO Quality Indicators in the Surgical Management of Endometrial Cancer: Insights from a Francogyn cohort".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1