Sung Cheol Park, Sang-Min Park, Hoon-Jae Chung, Yong Jin You
{"title":"Learning curve for full-endoscopic lumbar decompression via interlaminar approach using the learning curve cumulative summation analysis.","authors":"Sung Cheol Park, Sang-Min Park, Hoon-Jae Chung, Yong Jin You","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is generally considered to have a steep learning curve due to its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy via the interlaminar approach using learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) analysis, which provides objective statistical monitoring of surgical competency acquisition, and determine the number of cases required for surgical competency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the first 60 consecutive patients who underwent single-level interlaminar endoscopic unilateral lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis performed by a single surgeon with 4 years of experience. LC-CUSUM analysis was employed with operative time as the primary outcome measure. The target time was set at 80 min, based on the same surgeon's mean operative time for microscopic laminectomy. The patients were divided into the early (≤ 30 cases) and late (> 30 cases) learning periods and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LC-CUSUM analysis revealed that competency was achieved after 51 cases. The mean operative time significantly decreased from 90.20 ± 24.44 min in the early period to 71.47 ± 16.65 min in the late period (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss showed significant reduction (54.83 ± 42.58 ml vs. 34.83 ± 19.10 ml, p = 0.024). Complication rates remained consistent between periods (10% each), with similar rates of dural tears (6.67% in both periods).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study have demonstrated that a learning period of 51 cases could be required to achieve proficiency in full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression. However, the procedure can be safely performed even during the early learning period by surgeons with adequate microscopic surgical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is generally considered to have a steep learning curve due to its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy via the interlaminar approach using learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) analysis, which provides objective statistical monitoring of surgical competency acquisition, and determine the number of cases required for surgical competency.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the first 60 consecutive patients who underwent single-level interlaminar endoscopic unilateral lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis performed by a single surgeon with 4 years of experience. LC-CUSUM analysis was employed with operative time as the primary outcome measure. The target time was set at 80 min, based on the same surgeon's mean operative time for microscopic laminectomy. The patients were divided into the early (≤ 30 cases) and late (> 30 cases) learning periods and compared.
Results: LC-CUSUM analysis revealed that competency was achieved after 51 cases. The mean operative time significantly decreased from 90.20 ± 24.44 min in the early period to 71.47 ± 16.65 min in the late period (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss showed significant reduction (54.83 ± 42.58 ml vs. 34.83 ± 19.10 ml, p = 0.024). Complication rates remained consistent between periods (10% each), with similar rates of dural tears (6.67% in both periods).
Conclusions: The results of this study have demonstrated that a learning period of 51 cases could be required to achieve proficiency in full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression. However, the procedure can be safely performed even during the early learning period by surgeons with adequate microscopic surgical experience.
背景:全内窥镜脊柱手术(FESS)由于其技术复杂性,通常被认为具有陡峭的学习曲线。本研究旨在通过学习曲线累积求和检验(LC-CUSUM)分析,评估椎板间入路全内镜减压切除术的学习曲线,为手术能力获得提供客观的统计监测,并确定手术能力所需的病例数。方法:我们回顾性分析了前60例连续接受单节段椎板间内窥镜单侧腰椎减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的患者,由一名具有4年经验的外科医生实施。LC-CUSUM分析以手术时间为主要指标。目标时间设定为80分钟,基于同一外科医生显微椎板切除术的平均手术时间。将患者分为学习早期(≤30例)和学习晚期(≤30例)进行比较。结果:LC-CUSUM分析显示,51例患者均达到胜任能力。平均手术时间由早期的90.20±24.44 min显著缩短至晚期的71.47±16.65 min (p = 0.001)。估计失血量明显减少(54.83±42.58 ml vs. 34.83±19.10 ml, p = 0.024)。两期的并发症发生率保持一致(各为10%),硬膜撕裂率相似(两期均为6.67%)。结论:本研究的结果表明,51例患者需要学习一段时间才能熟练掌握全内窥镜腰椎板间减压术。然而,即使在早期学习阶段,具有足够显微手术经验的外科医生也可以安全地进行该手术。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.