Learning curve for full-endoscopic lumbar decompression via interlaminar approach using the learning curve cumulative summation analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y
Sung Cheol Park, Sang-Min Park, Hoon-Jae Chung, Yong Jin You
{"title":"Learning curve for full-endoscopic lumbar decompression via interlaminar approach using the learning curve cumulative summation analysis.","authors":"Sung Cheol Park, Sang-Min Park, Hoon-Jae Chung, Yong Jin You","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is generally considered to have a steep learning curve due to its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy via the interlaminar approach using learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) analysis, which provides objective statistical monitoring of surgical competency acquisition, and determine the number of cases required for surgical competency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the first 60 consecutive patients who underwent single-level interlaminar endoscopic unilateral lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis performed by a single surgeon with 4 years of experience. LC-CUSUM analysis was employed with operative time as the primary outcome measure. The target time was set at 80 min, based on the same surgeon's mean operative time for microscopic laminectomy. The patients were divided into the early (≤ 30 cases) and late (> 30 cases) learning periods and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LC-CUSUM analysis revealed that competency was achieved after 51 cases. The mean operative time significantly decreased from 90.20 ± 24.44 min in the early period to 71.47 ± 16.65 min in the late period (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss showed significant reduction (54.83 ± 42.58 ml vs. 34.83 ± 19.10 ml, p = 0.024). Complication rates remained consistent between periods (10% each), with similar rates of dural tears (6.67% in both periods).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study have demonstrated that a learning period of 51 cases could be required to achieve proficiency in full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression. However, the procedure can be safely performed even during the early learning period by surgeons with adequate microscopic surgical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is generally considered to have a steep learning curve due to its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy via the interlaminar approach using learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) analysis, which provides objective statistical monitoring of surgical competency acquisition, and determine the number of cases required for surgical competency.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the first 60 consecutive patients who underwent single-level interlaminar endoscopic unilateral lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis performed by a single surgeon with 4 years of experience. LC-CUSUM analysis was employed with operative time as the primary outcome measure. The target time was set at 80 min, based on the same surgeon's mean operative time for microscopic laminectomy. The patients were divided into the early (≤ 30 cases) and late (> 30 cases) learning periods and compared.

Results: LC-CUSUM analysis revealed that competency was achieved after 51 cases. The mean operative time significantly decreased from 90.20 ± 24.44 min in the early period to 71.47 ± 16.65 min in the late period (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss showed significant reduction (54.83 ± 42.58 ml vs. 34.83 ± 19.10 ml, p = 0.024). Complication rates remained consistent between periods (10% each), with similar rates of dural tears (6.67% in both periods).

Conclusions: The results of this study have demonstrated that a learning period of 51 cases could be required to achieve proficiency in full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression. However, the procedure can be safely performed even during the early learning period by surgeons with adequate microscopic surgical experience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用学习曲线累积和分析椎间入路全内窥镜腰椎减压的学习曲线。
背景:全内窥镜脊柱手术(FESS)由于其技术复杂性,通常被认为具有陡峭的学习曲线。本研究旨在通过学习曲线累积求和检验(LC-CUSUM)分析,评估椎板间入路全内镜减压切除术的学习曲线,为手术能力获得提供客观的统计监测,并确定手术能力所需的病例数。方法:我们回顾性分析了前60例连续接受单节段椎板间内窥镜单侧腰椎减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的患者,由一名具有4年经验的外科医生实施。LC-CUSUM分析以手术时间为主要指标。目标时间设定为80分钟,基于同一外科医生显微椎板切除术的平均手术时间。将患者分为学习早期(≤30例)和学习晚期(≤30例)进行比较。结果:LC-CUSUM分析显示,51例患者均达到胜任能力。平均手术时间由早期的90.20±24.44 min显著缩短至晚期的71.47±16.65 min (p = 0.001)。估计失血量明显减少(54.83±42.58 ml vs. 34.83±19.10 ml, p = 0.024)。两期的并发症发生率保持一致(各为10%),硬膜撕裂率相似(两期均为6.67%)。结论:本研究的结果表明,51例患者需要学习一段时间才能熟练掌握全内窥镜腰椎板间减压术。然而,即使在早期学习阶段,具有足够显微手术经验的外科医生也可以安全地进行该手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional TKA in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Comparative efficacy and safety of different posterior surgical approaches for Intra-articular distal humerus fractures. LINC00312 affects the progression of osteoarthritis by targeting miR-331-3p/DUSP5 axis. Does knee joint proprioception differ according to age and gender in healthy adults? The relationship between the polymorphisms and mutations of OPG gene and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women in northwest China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1