Evaluation of patient-perceived fatigue in multiple sclerosis utilizing the Finnish MS registry.

IF 2.3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552173251325098
Päivi Hämäläinen, Matias Viitala, Merja Soilu-Hänninen, Hanna Kuusisto, Marja Niiranen, Sari Avikainen, Juha Puustinen, Juhani Ruutiainen, Mervi Ryytty, Henrik Ahvenjärvi, Carl Björkholm, Annika Hulten
{"title":"Evaluation of patient-perceived fatigue in multiple sclerosis utilizing the Finnish MS registry.","authors":"Päivi Hämäläinen, Matias Viitala, Merja Soilu-Hänninen, Hanna Kuusisto, Marja Niiranen, Sari Avikainen, Juha Puustinen, Juhani Ruutiainen, Mervi Ryytty, Henrik Ahvenjärvi, Carl Björkholm, Annika Hulten","doi":"10.1177/20552173251325098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize patient-perceived fatigue by using the Finnish Multiple Sclerosis (MS) registry data.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and the Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue. Disease severity was evaluated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale and symptoms with the Visual Analogue Scales. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) included the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire, the Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimensions, the 15 D, and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. For the purposes of the study, patients were classified to those without (FSS ≤ 4) and those with (FSS ≥ 5) fatigue. The FSS scores were correlated with the results of other PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the 512 FSS scores, 47% of the patients reported fatigue (FSS ≥ 5). Fatigue was related to higher disability, lower education, and smoking. FSS correlated significantly with other measures of fatigue, cognitive, and mood symptoms, and was associated with lower Quality of Life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As an invisible and debilitating symptom fatigue should be evaluated systematically. In the screening, it is important to recognize the characteristics of the different scales. Whereas the FSS may serve as an overall screen, the FSMC may help to identify aspects of cognitive and motor fatigue separately.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"11 1","pages":"20552173251325098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173251325098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize patient-perceived fatigue by using the Finnish Multiple Sclerosis (MS) registry data.

Materials & methods: Fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and the Visual Analogue Scale-Fatigue. Disease severity was evaluated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale and symptoms with the Visual Analogue Scales. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) included the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire, the Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimensions, the 15 D, and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. For the purposes of the study, patients were classified to those without (FSS ≤ 4) and those with (FSS ≥ 5) fatigue. The FSS scores were correlated with the results of other PROs.

Results: Based on the 512 FSS scores, 47% of the patients reported fatigue (FSS ≥ 5). Fatigue was related to higher disability, lower education, and smoking. FSS correlated significantly with other measures of fatigue, cognitive, and mood symptoms, and was associated with lower Quality of Life.

Conclusions: As an invisible and debilitating symptom fatigue should be evaluated systematically. In the screening, it is important to recognize the characteristics of the different scales. Whereas the FSS may serve as an overall screen, the FSMC may help to identify aspects of cognitive and motor fatigue separately.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用芬兰多发性硬化症注册表评估多发性硬化症患者感知疲劳。
目的:通过使用芬兰多发性硬化症(MS)注册数据来描述患者感知疲劳的特征。材料与方法:采用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、运动与认知功能疲劳量表(FSMC)和视觉模拟疲劳量表对疲劳进行评估。用扩展残疾状态量表评估疾病严重程度,用视觉模拟量表评估症状。患者报告的结果(PROs)包括多发性硬化症神经心理学问卷、欧洲生活质量- 5维度、15d和多发性硬化症影响量表。为了研究的目的,将患者分为无(FSS≤4)疲劳组和(FSS≥5)疲劳组。FSS评分与其他评价结果存在相关性。结果:根据512个FSS评分,47%的患者报告疲劳(FSS≥5)。疲劳与残疾程度高、受教育程度低和吸烟有关。FSS与疲劳、认知和情绪症状的其他指标显著相关,并与较低的生活质量相关。结论:疲劳是一种无形的衰弱症状,应系统评估。在筛选中,重要的是要认识到不同量表的特点。FSS可以作为一个全面的筛查,FSMC可以帮助识别认知疲劳和运动疲劳的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Baricitinib triggering a central nervous system inflammatory-demyelinating disease: A case report. Apolipoprotein E4 and its later-life health effects on the multiple sclerosis population. The impact of relapse on patient disability, clinical outcomes, and subsequent burdens to patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and caregivers. Setting priorities for how future research in multiple sclerosis in Canada considers equity, diversity and inclusion: A modified e-Delphi study. Leptomeningeal enhancement in multiple sclerosis demonstrates posterior predilection and T1 alterations in the adjacent cortex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1