Noninvasive Quantitative Compression Ultrasound Central Venous Pressure: A Clinical Pilot Study.

IF 7.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL BME frontiers Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34133/bmef.0115
Alex T Jaffe, Roger Pallarès-López, Jeffrey K Raines, Aaron D Aguirre, Brian W Anthony
{"title":"Noninvasive Quantitative Compression Ultrasound Central Venous Pressure: A Clinical Pilot Study.","authors":"Alex T Jaffe, Roger Pallarès-López, Jeffrey K Raines, Aaron D Aguirre, Brian W Anthony","doi":"10.34133/bmef.0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This is an initial study to validate central venous pressure (CVP) measurements derived from quantitative compression ultrasound (QCU). <b>Impact Statement:</b> This study is the first gold standard invasive validation of CVP estimation from QCU. <b>Introduction:</b> QCU finds the collapse force-the force required for complete occlusion-of the short axis of the internal jugular vein (IJV) to estimate CVP. <b>Methods:</b> We captured QCU data as well as the noninvasive clinical standard jugular venous pulsation height (JVP) on cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). We compared these data to ground truth invasive CVP data from the MGH CICU. <b>Results:</b> Using linear regression, we correlated invasive CVP with collapse force (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>: 0.82, error: 1.08 mmHg) and with JVP (<i>r</i> <sup>2</sup>: 0.45, error: 1.39 mmHg). To directly compare our method to JVP, we measured the percentage of patients whose uncertainty estimates for QCU methods and for JVP overlapped with their invasive CVP counterparts. We found that the CVP overlap accuracy of collapse force (77.8%) and of collapse force and hydrostatic offset (88.9%) are higher than that of JVP (12.5%). Finally, we input QCU image segmentation data of the short-axis cross-sections of the IJV and carotid artery into an inverse finite element model to predict the invasive CVP waveform. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results validate the noninvasive technique for estimating CVP, namely, QCU, indicating that it may provide a desirable, middle-ground alternative to invasive catheterization and to visual inspection of the JVP.</p>","PeriodicalId":72430,"journal":{"name":"BME frontiers","volume":"6 ","pages":"0115"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BME frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/bmef.0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This is an initial study to validate central venous pressure (CVP) measurements derived from quantitative compression ultrasound (QCU). Impact Statement: This study is the first gold standard invasive validation of CVP estimation from QCU. Introduction: QCU finds the collapse force-the force required for complete occlusion-of the short axis of the internal jugular vein (IJV) to estimate CVP. Methods: We captured QCU data as well as the noninvasive clinical standard jugular venous pulsation height (JVP) on cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). We compared these data to ground truth invasive CVP data from the MGH CICU. Results: Using linear regression, we correlated invasive CVP with collapse force (r 2: 0.82, error: 1.08 mmHg) and with JVP (r 2: 0.45, error: 1.39 mmHg). To directly compare our method to JVP, we measured the percentage of patients whose uncertainty estimates for QCU methods and for JVP overlapped with their invasive CVP counterparts. We found that the CVP overlap accuracy of collapse force (77.8%) and of collapse force and hydrostatic offset (88.9%) are higher than that of JVP (12.5%). Finally, we input QCU image segmentation data of the short-axis cross-sections of the IJV and carotid artery into an inverse finite element model to predict the invasive CVP waveform. Conclusion: These results validate the noninvasive technique for estimating CVP, namely, QCU, indicating that it may provide a desirable, middle-ground alternative to invasive catheterization and to visual inspection of the JVP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创超声中心静脉压定量压缩:临床先导研究。
目的:这是一项验证定量压缩超声(QCU)测量中心静脉压(CVP)的初步研究。影响声明:本研究是第一个由QCU估算CVP的金标准侵入性验证。QCU通过颈内静脉(IJV)短轴的塌陷力(完全闭塞所需的力)来估计CVP。方法:采集美国马萨诸塞州总医院(MGH)心脏重症监护病房(CICU)患者的QCU数据以及无创临床标准颈静脉脉动高度(JVP)。我们将这些数据与MGH CICU的地面真实侵入性CVP数据进行了比较。结果:通过线性回归,我们将有创CVP与塌陷力(r: 0.82,误差:1.08 mmHg)和JVP (r: 0.45,误差:1.39 mmHg)相关。为了直接将我们的方法与JVP进行比较,我们测量了QCU方法和JVP的不确定性估计与侵入性CVP相重叠的患者百分比。我们发现CVP的塌陷力(77.8%)和塌陷力与静水偏移量(88.9%)的重叠精度高于JVP(12.5%)。最后,我们将IJV和颈动脉短轴截面的QCU图像分割数据输入到逆有限元模型中,预测有创CVP波形。结论:这些结果验证了评估CVP(即QCU)的无创技术,表明它可能提供一种理想的、中间的替代方案,以替代有创导管术和JVP目视检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Optimization of Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy Efficiency Based on Hyperspectral-Photoacoustic Dual-Modality Imaging Feedback. Nondestructive, High-Resolution T Cell Characterization and Subtyping via Deep-UV Microscopy. Digital Twin Brain: Generating Multitask Behavior from Connectomes for Personalized Therapy. Deep Learning-Enabled Virtual Multiplexed Immunostaining of Label-Free Tissue for Vascular Invasion Assessment. Baicalein Alleviates Iron Overload-Induced Ferroptosis and Osteogenic Blockade in Osteoblasts by Activating the Nrf2/GPX4 Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1