Prognostic value of [18F]FDG- and PSMA-PET in patients evaluated for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy of mCRPC

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07198-y
Tugce Telli, Leonor Lopes, Madeleine Karpinski, Kim M. Pabst, Viktor Grünwald, Kuangyu Shi, Boris Hadaschik, Claudia Kesch, Lale Umutlu, Ken Herrmann, Robert Seifert, Wolfgang P. Fendler
{"title":"Prognostic value of [18F]FDG- and PSMA-PET in patients evaluated for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy of mCRPC","authors":"Tugce Telli, Leonor Lopes, Madeleine Karpinski, Kim M. Pabst, Viktor Grünwald, Kuangyu Shi, Boris Hadaschik, Claudia Kesch, Lale Umutlu, Ken Herrmann, Robert Seifert, Wolfgang P. Fendler","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07198-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To improve [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-Prostate-specific membrane antigen therapy (LuPSMA) selection, this study investigates the prognostic value of PSMA and 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG)-PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients considered for LuPSMA therapy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis in 152 mCRPC patients referred for LuPSMA therapy who underwent PSMA and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT. Of these, 104 patients (68.4%) underwent LuPSMA therapy, while 48 (31.6%) received other standard of care (SOC). PET/CT analyses included visual assessment and semiquantitative measurements. Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and PSA response (decline &gt; 50%) were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Baseline [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-derived total tumor volume was the only independent predictor of overall survival both in patients subsequently treated with LuPSMA (HR 1.28 [95%CI 1.02—1.61]; p = 0.03) or in those under other SOC (HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02—2.56]; p = 0.04), respectively. In other SOC patients, additional independent predictors of OS were total lesion PSMA uptake (PSMA-TL; HR 1.14 [95%CI 1.03–1.26]; p = 0.01), [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG mean SUV (HR 20.88 [95%CI 1.2–364.74]; p = 0.04), and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG total lesion glycolysis (HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02–2.56]; p = 0.04). In LuPSMA patients, PSMA-PET SUVmean was a significant independent predictor of PSA decline ≥ 50% (OR 2.97 [95%CI 1.27–8.16]; p = 0.02).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>PSMA-PET and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET provide imaging biomarkers of outcome in candidates for LuPSMA. FDG-PET total tumor volume was an independent predictor of overall survival in candidates for LuPSMA therapy, irrespective of subsequent treatment decision. PSMA-PET SUVmean was associated with biochemical response to LuPSMA. Dual tracer imaging should further be assessed in prospective trials for mCRPC treatment guidance.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07198-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To improve [177Lu]Lu-Prostate-specific membrane antigen therapy (LuPSMA) selection, this study investigates the prognostic value of PSMA and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG)-PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients considered for LuPSMA therapy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis in 152 mCRPC patients referred for LuPSMA therapy who underwent PSMA and [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Of these, 104 patients (68.4%) underwent LuPSMA therapy, while 48 (31.6%) received other standard of care (SOC). PET/CT analyses included visual assessment and semiquantitative measurements. Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and PSA response (decline > 50%) were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

Results

Baseline [18F]FDG-derived total tumor volume was the only independent predictor of overall survival both in patients subsequently treated with LuPSMA (HR 1.28 [95%CI 1.02—1.61]; p = 0.03) or in those under other SOC (HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02—2.56]; p = 0.04), respectively. In other SOC patients, additional independent predictors of OS were total lesion PSMA uptake (PSMA-TL; HR 1.14 [95%CI 1.03–1.26]; p = 0.01), [18F]FDG mean SUV (HR 20.88 [95%CI 1.2–364.74]; p = 0.04), and [18F]FDG total lesion glycolysis (HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02–2.56]; p = 0.04). In LuPSMA patients, PSMA-PET SUVmean was a significant independent predictor of PSA decline ≥ 50% (OR 2.97 [95%CI 1.27–8.16]; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

PSMA-PET and [18F]FDG-PET provide imaging biomarkers of outcome in candidates for LuPSMA. FDG-PET total tumor volume was an independent predictor of overall survival in candidates for LuPSMA therapy, irrespective of subsequent treatment decision. PSMA-PET SUVmean was associated with biochemical response to LuPSMA. Dual tracer imaging should further be assessed in prospective trials for mCRPC treatment guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA治疗的mCRPC患者进行[18F]FDG和PSMA-PET评估的预后价值
目的为了提高[177Lu] lu -前列腺特异性膜抗原治疗(LuPSMA)的选择,本研究探讨PSMA和2-[18F]氟-2-脱氧-d -葡萄糖([18F]FDG)- pet对转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)考虑进行LuPSMA治疗的患者的预后价值。方法回顾性分析152例接受PSMA和[18F]FDG-PET/CT治疗的mCRPC患者。其中,104名患者(68.4%)接受了LuPSMA治疗,48名患者(31.6%)接受了其他标准治疗(SOC)。PET/CT分析包括目视评估和半定量测量。记录临床和实验室参数。总生存期(OS)和PSA反应(下降50%)分别是主要和次要终点。结果基线[18F] fdg衍生的肿瘤总体积是随后接受LuPSMA治疗的患者总生存的唯一独立预测因子(HR 1.28 [95%CI 1.02-1.61];p = 0.03)或其他SOC (HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02-2.56];P = 0.04)。在其他SOC患者中,OS的其他独立预测因子是病变PSMA摄取总量(PSMA- tl;Hr 1.14 [95%ci 1.03-1.26];p = 0.01), [18F]FDG平均SUV (HR 20.88 [95%CI 1.2 ~ 364.74];p = 0.04), [18F]FDG病变糖酵解总量(HR 1.61 [95%CI 1.02-2.56];p = 0.04)。在LuPSMA患者中,PSMA-PET SUVmean是PSA下降≥50%的重要独立预测因子(OR 2.97 [95%CI 1.27-8.16];p = 0.02)。结论psma - pet和[18F]FDG-PET可作为LuPSMA患者预后的影像学生物标志物。无论随后的治疗决定如何,FDG-PET肿瘤总体积是LuPSMA治疗候选者总生存期的独立预测因子。PSMA-PET SUVmean与LuPSMA的生化反应相关。双示踪成像应在前瞻性试验中进一步评估,以指导mCRPC的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
The diagnostic value of [18F]F-NOTA-FAPI PET/CT in suspected recurrent ovarian cancer with CA125 dynamic increase level but negative conventional imaging findings. Dual-tracer PET/CT and cocktail therapy with [177Lu]Lu-FAP2286 and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in G3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET). Functional alterations due to post-COVID-19 lung lesions - lessons from a multicenter V/Q SPECT/CT based registry. Challenges and unmet needs of [18F]fluorocholine PET in hyperparathyroidism: A framework for refining current practice and advancing parathyroid imaging. Prediction of alzheimer's disease time to dementia onset using cross-sectional data from spatiotemporal biomarker progression patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1