Person-Centered Profiles Exploring School Engagement and Illusory Bias for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Support Needs

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1177/10634266251326078
Christen Knowles, Katherine W. Bromley, Christopher Murray, James Sinclair, Yen Pham
{"title":"Person-Centered Profiles Exploring School Engagement and Illusory Bias for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Support Needs","authors":"Christen Knowles, Katherine W. Bromley, Christopher Murray, James Sinclair, Yen Pham","doi":"10.1177/10634266251326078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children identified with emotional and behavioral support needs often demonstrate varying levels of externalizing, hyperactive, and internalizing behaviors requiring diverse prevention and intervention efforts. The current study implemented a latent profile analysis (LPA) to explore meaningful differences in a sample of 180 children receiving special education services for emotional or behavioral support needs. Six profiles were identified based on externalizing, internalizing, and hyperactive indicators. We then tested criterion variables of teacher and student reports of emotional and behavioral engagement and disaffection across the profiles. Significant differences were found for the teacher, not the student report. Finally, we created a student–teacher perception of engagement discrepancy score to explore concordance of ratings across profiles. Findings indicated evidence of student illusory bias related to perceptions of functioning compared to their teacher. Results demonstrated that student profiles with higher levels of support needs were associated with less agreement of student functioning across the four engagement and disaffection subscales. Limitations and implications for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":47557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266251326078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children identified with emotional and behavioral support needs often demonstrate varying levels of externalizing, hyperactive, and internalizing behaviors requiring diverse prevention and intervention efforts. The current study implemented a latent profile analysis (LPA) to explore meaningful differences in a sample of 180 children receiving special education services for emotional or behavioral support needs. Six profiles were identified based on externalizing, internalizing, and hyperactive indicators. We then tested criterion variables of teacher and student reports of emotional and behavioral engagement and disaffection across the profiles. Significant differences were found for the teacher, not the student report. Finally, we created a student–teacher perception of engagement discrepancy score to explore concordance of ratings across profiles. Findings indicated evidence of student illusory bias related to perceptions of functioning compared to their teacher. Results demonstrated that student profiles with higher levels of support needs were associated with less agreement of student functioning across the four engagement and disaffection subscales. Limitations and implications for future research are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有情感和行为支持需求的学生,以人为本的学校参与和错觉偏见研究
有情感和行为支持需求的儿童通常表现出不同程度的外化、过度活跃和内化行为,需要采取不同的预防和干预措施。本研究采用潜在特征分析(LPA)来探讨180名接受特殊教育服务的儿童在情感或行为支持需求方面的有意义的差异。根据外化、内化和过度活跃指标确定了六种概况。然后,我们测试了教师和学生报告的情感和行为参与和不满的标准变量。在老师的报告中发现了显著的差异,而不是学生的报告。最后,我们创建了一个学生-教师敬业度感知差异评分,以探索不同档案评分的一致性。研究结果表明,与老师相比,学生的错觉偏见与功能感知有关。结果表明,支持需求水平较高的学生在四个参与和不满分量表中对学生功能的认同程度较低。指出了未来研究的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders publishes quality scholarship related to individuals with emotional and behavioral disorders. Articles represent a wide range of disciplines, including counseling, education, early childhood care, juvenile corrections, mental health, psychiatry, psychology, public health, rehabilitation, social work, and special education. Articles on characteristics, assessment, prevention, intervention, treatment, legal or policy issues, and evaluation are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Finnish Lower Secondary Special Needs Teachers’ Reported Responsibilities and Supports for Students With Behavioral Problems “I Would Be There the Next Day” Versus “It’s Not Their Business”: Parent Perceptions of School-Based PCIT Specific Negative Outcomes of Bullying or Victimization Forms on Psychological Adjustment Preliminary Testing of Recognize. Relax. Record.: A Tier 2 Intervention for Elementary Students With Internalizing Behaviors Parent–Teacher Discrepancies About the Mental Health of Siblings of Children With Chronic Disorders: A Latent Profile Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1