Vahid Gholami, Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Edris Taghvaye Salimi
{"title":"Comparison of extreme gradient boosting, deep learning, and self-organizing map methods in predicting groundwater depth","authors":"Vahid Gholami, Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Edris Taghvaye Salimi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excessive extraction of groundwater resources has led to a drop in the groundwater table. On the other hand, accurate data on spatial and temporal changes in groundwater depth (GWD) in the plains of Iran is not available. Therefore, using a new modeling method such as artificial intelligence to predict the groundwater depth can be efficient for accessing the desired data. This research aimed to compare the performance of extreme gradient boosting (EGB), deep learning (DL), and self-organizing map (SOM) methods in predicting the GWD on the Mazandaran plain. Data of the GWD from 250 piezometric wells was used as the output parameter. The effective factors in GWD fluctuations were used as input variables. Data were separated into two categories (a) 70% for training, and (b) 30% for the test stage. The modeling process was performed using the two methods of machine learning (EGB and DL), and a SOM with the same data. Three models were trained and tested and their results were compared. The modeling results in the training phase were appropriate for EGB (R-sqr = 0.97, NSE = 0.95), DL (R-sqr = 0.972, NSE = 0.81) and SOM (R-sqr = 0.88, NSE = 0.65) models. In the test phase, models EGB (R-sqr = 0.82, NSE = 0.8) DL(R-sqr = 0.74, NSE = 0.56), and SOM (R-sqr = 0.61, NSE = 0.31) had different performance.The results indicated that the EGB method possessed the maximum performance in the training and testing stages compared to the other two methods. Then, the tested EGB model was used to predict the spatial variations of GWD in the study plain, and the predicted results in the GIS were presented as a GWD map. The results of the analysis of the GWD map proved the high performance of the used methodology (R-sqr = 0.79). Finally, the proposed methodology can be used as a tool to predict the spatial variation of GWD in places without data or other plains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Excessive extraction of groundwater resources has led to a drop in the groundwater table. On the other hand, accurate data on spatial and temporal changes in groundwater depth (GWD) in the plains of Iran is not available. Therefore, using a new modeling method such as artificial intelligence to predict the groundwater depth can be efficient for accessing the desired data. This research aimed to compare the performance of extreme gradient boosting (EGB), deep learning (DL), and self-organizing map (SOM) methods in predicting the GWD on the Mazandaran plain. Data of the GWD from 250 piezometric wells was used as the output parameter. The effective factors in GWD fluctuations were used as input variables. Data were separated into two categories (a) 70% for training, and (b) 30% for the test stage. The modeling process was performed using the two methods of machine learning (EGB and DL), and a SOM with the same data. Three models were trained and tested and their results were compared. The modeling results in the training phase were appropriate for EGB (R-sqr = 0.97, NSE = 0.95), DL (R-sqr = 0.972, NSE = 0.81) and SOM (R-sqr = 0.88, NSE = 0.65) models. In the test phase, models EGB (R-sqr = 0.82, NSE = 0.8) DL(R-sqr = 0.74, NSE = 0.56), and SOM (R-sqr = 0.61, NSE = 0.31) had different performance.The results indicated that the EGB method possessed the maximum performance in the training and testing stages compared to the other two methods. Then, the tested EGB model was used to predict the spatial variations of GWD in the study plain, and the predicted results in the GIS were presented as a GWD map. The results of the analysis of the GWD map proved the high performance of the used methodology (R-sqr = 0.79). Finally, the proposed methodology can be used as a tool to predict the spatial variation of GWD in places without data or other plains.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.