Comparison of extreme gradient boosting, deep learning, and self-organizing map methods in predicting groundwater depth

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7
Vahid Gholami, Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Edris Taghvaye Salimi
{"title":"Comparison of extreme gradient boosting, deep learning, and self-organizing map methods in predicting groundwater depth","authors":"Vahid Gholami,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Khaleghi,&nbsp;Edris Taghvaye Salimi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Excessive extraction of groundwater resources has led to a drop in the groundwater table. On the other hand, accurate data on spatial and temporal changes in groundwater depth (GWD) in the plains of Iran is not available. Therefore, using a new modeling method such as artificial intelligence to predict the groundwater depth can be efficient for accessing the desired data. This research aimed to compare the performance of extreme gradient boosting (EGB), deep learning (DL), and self-organizing map (SOM) methods in predicting the GWD on the Mazandaran plain. Data of the GWD from 250 piezometric wells was used as the output parameter. The effective factors in GWD fluctuations were used as input variables. Data were separated into two categories (a) 70% for training, and (b) 30% for the test stage. The modeling process was performed using the two methods of machine learning (EGB and DL), and a SOM with the same data. Three models were trained and tested and their results were compared. The modeling results in the training phase were appropriate for EGB (R-sqr = 0.97, NSE = 0.95), DL (R-sqr = 0.972, NSE = 0.81) and SOM (R-sqr = 0.88, NSE = 0.65) models. In the test phase, models EGB (R-sqr = 0.82, NSE = 0.8) DL(R-sqr = 0.74, NSE = 0.56), and SOM (R-sqr = 0.61, NSE = 0.31) had different performance.The results indicated that the EGB method possessed the maximum performance in the training and testing stages compared to the other two methods. Then, the tested EGB model was used to predict the spatial variations of GWD in the study plain, and the predicted results in the GIS were presented as a GWD map. The results of the analysis of the GWD map proved the high performance of the used methodology (R-sqr = 0.79). Finally, the proposed methodology can be used as a tool to predict the spatial variation of GWD in places without data or other plains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12183-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive extraction of groundwater resources has led to a drop in the groundwater table. On the other hand, accurate data on spatial and temporal changes in groundwater depth (GWD) in the plains of Iran is not available. Therefore, using a new modeling method such as artificial intelligence to predict the groundwater depth can be efficient for accessing the desired data. This research aimed to compare the performance of extreme gradient boosting (EGB), deep learning (DL), and self-organizing map (SOM) methods in predicting the GWD on the Mazandaran plain. Data of the GWD from 250 piezometric wells was used as the output parameter. The effective factors in GWD fluctuations were used as input variables. Data were separated into two categories (a) 70% for training, and (b) 30% for the test stage. The modeling process was performed using the two methods of machine learning (EGB and DL), and a SOM with the same data. Three models were trained and tested and their results were compared. The modeling results in the training phase were appropriate for EGB (R-sqr = 0.97, NSE = 0.95), DL (R-sqr = 0.972, NSE = 0.81) and SOM (R-sqr = 0.88, NSE = 0.65) models. In the test phase, models EGB (R-sqr = 0.82, NSE = 0.8) DL(R-sqr = 0.74, NSE = 0.56), and SOM (R-sqr = 0.61, NSE = 0.31) had different performance.The results indicated that the EGB method possessed the maximum performance in the training and testing stages compared to the other two methods. Then, the tested EGB model was used to predict the spatial variations of GWD in the study plain, and the predicted results in the GIS were presented as a GWD map. The results of the analysis of the GWD map proved the high performance of the used methodology (R-sqr = 0.79). Finally, the proposed methodology can be used as a tool to predict the spatial variation of GWD in places without data or other plains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端梯度增强、深度学习和自组织地图预测地下水深度的比较
地下水资源的过度开采导致地下水位下降。另一方面,伊朗平原地区地下水深度(GWD)时空变化的准确数据是不可获得的。因此,使用人工智能等新的建模方法来预测地下水深度可以有效地获取所需的数据。本研究旨在比较极端梯度增强(EGB)、深度学习(DL)和自组织地图(SOM)方法在马赞达兰平原GWD预测中的性能。采用250口压力井的GWD数据作为输出参数。以GWD波动的有效因子作为输入变量。数据分为两类(a) 70%用于训练,(b) 30%用于测试阶段。建模过程使用两种机器学习方法(EGB和DL)和具有相同数据的SOM进行。对三种模型进行了训练和测试,并对结果进行了比较。训练阶段的建模结果适用于EGB模型(R-sqr = 0.97, NSE = 0.95)、DL模型(R-sqr = 0.972, NSE = 0.81)和SOM模型(R-sqr = 0.88, NSE = 0.65)。在测试阶段,EGB模型(R-sqr = 0.82, NSE = 0.8)、DL模型(R-sqr = 0.74, NSE = 0.56)和SOM模型(R-sqr = 0.61, NSE = 0.31)具有不同的性能。结果表明,与其他两种方法相比,EGB方法在训练和测试阶段具有最高的性能。利用经检验的EGB模型对研究平原GWD的空间变化进行预测,并将预测结果在GIS中以GWD图的形式呈现。GWD图的分析结果证明了所采用方法的高性能(R-sqr = 0.79)。最后,该方法可作为预测无数据地区或其他平原地区GWD空间变化的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Hydrological connectivity between riparian groundwater and streamwater system in Kishanganga River Basin (KRB): insights from solutes and stable water isotopes Explainable machine learning with ensemble-based uncertainty quantification for groundwater quality indices in the Ganfu Plain, China Key drivers of physics-embedded machine learning performance for streamflow prediction Heavy metal(loid) hazards in groundwater near the Menzel Bourguiba (Tunisia) smelting site Radon concentration variability and microclimate controls in two Slovene show caves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1