TICU-Feedback-Tool: development and pilot application of a questionnaire to assess performance in tele-intensive care collaborations.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12565-4
Franziska Lezius, Karin Steinecke, Anne Herholz, Stephen Schüürhuis, Andreas Edel, Michaela Niebank, Nicolai Andrees, Claudia D Spies, Björn Weiss
{"title":"TICU-Feedback-Tool: development and pilot application of a questionnaire to assess performance in tele-intensive care collaborations.","authors":"Franziska Lezius, Karin Steinecke, Anne Herholz, Stephen Schüürhuis, Andreas Edel, Michaela Niebank, Nicolai Andrees, Claudia D Spies, Björn Weiss","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12565-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine is a suitable vehicle to facilitate collaboration among hospitals across borders, with the COVID-19 pandemic paving the way for rapidly growing tele-intensive care (TICU) networks, aiming to improve quality of care. Hitherto there are no validated instruments to assess and evaluate performance in international TICU collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, structured survey development study with a single-step online expert consensus approach and a pilot application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We propose a 26-indicator TICU-Feedback-Tool assessing user-friendliness, subjective benefit and usability, acceptance and potential for improvement in TICU networks. The instrument is suitable for self-reporting by online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest a pilot version of a feedback questionnaire for quality management in (inter-)national TICU networks that will be subject to revisions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12565-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine is a suitable vehicle to facilitate collaboration among hospitals across borders, with the COVID-19 pandemic paving the way for rapidly growing tele-intensive care (TICU) networks, aiming to improve quality of care. Hitherto there are no validated instruments to assess and evaluate performance in international TICU collaboration.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, structured survey development study with a single-step online expert consensus approach and a pilot application.

Results: We propose a 26-indicator TICU-Feedback-Tool assessing user-friendliness, subjective benefit and usability, acceptance and potential for improvement in TICU networks. The instrument is suitable for self-reporting by online questionnaire.

Conclusion: We suggest a pilot version of a feedback questionnaire for quality management in (inter-)national TICU networks that will be subject to revisions in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ticu反馈工具:开发和试点应用问卷,以评估远程重症监护合作的绩效。
背景:随着COVID-19大流行为旨在提高医疗质量的快速发展的远程重症监护(TICU)网络铺平道路,远程医疗是促进跨境医院之间合作的合适工具。到目前为止,还没有有效的工具来评估和评价国际间TICU合作的表现。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性的、结构化的调查发展研究,采用单步在线专家共识方法和试点应用。结果:我们提出了一个26个指标的TICU反馈工具,评估TICU网络的用户友好性、主观效益和可用性、接受度和改进潜力。该仪器适合通过在线问卷进行自我报告。结论:我们建议在(国际)国家TICU网络中进行质量管理反馈问卷的试点版本,该问卷将在未来进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring implementation and sustainability of a community paramedicine model to reduce hospitalizations: a pragmatic randomized trial. Achieving universal health coverage with disability inclusion: a household survey analyzing healthcare access and national health insurance utilization for individuals with disabilities in Indonesia. Antimicrobial resistance and physician prescribing of antibiotics in Alberta: a qualitative exploration. Delayed medical care experiences among patients with head and neck cancers: an exploratory study using patient journey mapping. Obstetric Violence, Nurses' and midwives' perspectives and experiences: a meta-synthesis study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1