Profiling bacterial communities in feedlot cattle affected with bovine foot rot and bovine digital dermatitis lesions using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY BMC Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s12866-025-03869-w
Susan Pyakurel, Benjamin Jordan Caddey, Angelica Petersen Dias, Jeroen De Buck, Douglas Walter Morck, Karin Orsel
{"title":"Profiling bacterial communities in feedlot cattle affected with bovine foot rot and bovine digital dermatitis lesions using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR.","authors":"Susan Pyakurel, Benjamin Jordan Caddey, Angelica Petersen Dias, Jeroen De Buck, Douglas Walter Morck, Karin Orsel","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03869-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary infectious foot diseases in cattle, bovine foot rot (BFR) and bovine digital dermatitis (BDD), commonly associated with Fusobacterium necrophorum and Treponema spp., respectively, are considered polybacterial in etiology with several additional bacteria involved such as Porphyromonas levii, Bacteroides pyogenes, and Fusobacterium mortiferum. BDD is further classified into several M-stages (M2: active and ulcerative; M4: chronic proliferative). Using quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region) sequencing, we quantified several specific bacteria and analyzed bacterial communities present in biopsies of visually diagnosed cases of BFR (n = 32), M2 (n = 17), and M4 (n = 12) stages of BDD in feedlot cattle in contrast to inconclusive (n = 14) clinical cases and healthy (n = 25) cattle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial composition of healthy skin differed significantly from that of skin lesions, and between BFR and both lesion stages of BDD, which also differed from each other. All animal groups had generally the same bacterial species, albeit in distinct ratios. Differential abundance analysis relative to the healthy group identified a higher abundance of Fusobacterium spp. in BFR and Treponema spp. in both BDD-M2 and BDD-M4. P. levii had the highest absolute abundance in all animal groups. A significantly higher abundance of F. necrophorum was observed in BFR compared to BDD-M2, and F. mortiferum in both stages of BDD compared to the inconclusive group. Both BDD M-stages had a significantly higher abundance of Treponema phagedenis and Treponema pedis. Treponema medium was significantly more abundant in BDD-M4 compared to BDD-M2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results further the evidence of the involvement of Treponema spp., in BDD in feedlot cattle. However, it suggests further exploration of the role of Fusobacterium spp. in BFR and BDD. Importantly, a discriminating polybacterial involvement in these infections was evident demonstrated by changes in the population of multiple bacteria when compared to healthy animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03869-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary infectious foot diseases in cattle, bovine foot rot (BFR) and bovine digital dermatitis (BDD), commonly associated with Fusobacterium necrophorum and Treponema spp., respectively, are considered polybacterial in etiology with several additional bacteria involved such as Porphyromonas levii, Bacteroides pyogenes, and Fusobacterium mortiferum. BDD is further classified into several M-stages (M2: active and ulcerative; M4: chronic proliferative). Using quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 region) sequencing, we quantified several specific bacteria and analyzed bacterial communities present in biopsies of visually diagnosed cases of BFR (n = 32), M2 (n = 17), and M4 (n = 12) stages of BDD in feedlot cattle in contrast to inconclusive (n = 14) clinical cases and healthy (n = 25) cattle.

Results: Bacterial composition of healthy skin differed significantly from that of skin lesions, and between BFR and both lesion stages of BDD, which also differed from each other. All animal groups had generally the same bacterial species, albeit in distinct ratios. Differential abundance analysis relative to the healthy group identified a higher abundance of Fusobacterium spp. in BFR and Treponema spp. in both BDD-M2 and BDD-M4. P. levii had the highest absolute abundance in all animal groups. A significantly higher abundance of F. necrophorum was observed in BFR compared to BDD-M2, and F. mortiferum in both stages of BDD compared to the inconclusive group. Both BDD M-stages had a significantly higher abundance of Treponema phagedenis and Treponema pedis. Treponema medium was significantly more abundant in BDD-M4 compared to BDD-M2.

Conclusion: These results further the evidence of the involvement of Treponema spp., in BDD in feedlot cattle. However, it suggests further exploration of the role of Fusobacterium spp. in BFR and BDD. Importantly, a discriminating polybacterial involvement in these infections was evident demonstrated by changes in the population of multiple bacteria when compared to healthy animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用16S rRNA基因测序和实时荧光定量PCR分析牛足腐病和牛数字性皮炎病变的饲养场牛细菌群落。
背景:牛的原发性感染性足病,牛足腐病(BFR)和牛指性皮炎(BDD),通常分别与坏死性梭杆菌和螺旋体有关,在病因学上被认为是多细菌的,涉及一些额外的细菌,如卟啉单胞菌,化脓性拟杆菌和腐肉梭杆菌。BDD进一步分为几个m期(M2:活动性和溃疡性;M4:慢性增生性)。通过实时荧光定量PCR和16S rRNA基因(V3-V4区)测序,我们定量分析了几种特异性细菌,并分析了饲养场牛BFR (n = 32)、M2 (n = 17)和M4 (n = 12)期BDD的活检中存在的细菌群落,与未确定的临床病例(n = 14)和健康牛(n = 25)进行了对比。结果:健康皮肤的细菌组成与病变皮肤的细菌组成存在显著差异,BFR与BDD两个病变阶段之间的细菌组成也存在差异。尽管比例不同,但所有动物群体的细菌种类大致相同。相对于健康组的差异丰度分析发现,BDD-M2和BDD-M4的BFR和密螺旋体的丰度较高。在所有动物类群中,赖氏假单胞菌的绝对丰度最高。与BDD- m2相比,BFR中坏死乳杆菌的丰度明显更高,与不确定组相比,BDD两个阶段的mortiferum丰度明显更高。两个BDD m期的噬菌体密螺旋体和足螺旋体的丰度均显著增加。密螺旋体培养基在BDD-M4中的丰度明显高于BDD-M2。结论:这些结果进一步证明了密螺旋体在饲养场牛BDD中的作用。然而,这表明Fusobacterium sp .在BFR和BDD中的作用有待进一步探索。重要的是,与健康动物相比,多种细菌种群的变化明显证明了多细菌参与这些感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
期刊最新文献
A longitudinal evaluation of localised chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis rat models. An adaptive weight self-distillation deep learning framework for phenotype prediction from longitudinal gut microbiome data. Gut dysbiosis in people with epilepsy: a dual-site cross-sectional study of enterobacteriaceae patterns and clinical correlates in peri-urban and urban Ghana. Global resistome architecture of Escherichia coli across human and animal hosts: analysis of 9,696 genome. Correlation analysis between vaginal microbiota and quality of life across different female life stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1