The effect of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS treatment on polyp recurrence: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1557877
Cheng Peng, Jie Liu, Hongmei Ding, Hui Duan, Lan Chen, Zichang Feng
{"title":"The effect of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS treatment on polyp recurrence: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Cheng Peng, Jie Liu, Hongmei Ding, Hui Duan, Lan Chen, Zichang Feng","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1557877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hysteroscopic polypectomy is a common method for treating endometrial polyps, but postoperative recurrence remains a key concern. Recently, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been suggested to reduce the recurrence rate of polyps. This study aims to investigate the differences in recurrence rates and recurrence-free survival times between hysteroscopic polypectomy alone and hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS, and to assess their impact on recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively included clinical data from 1,160 patients with endometrial polyps from 2020 to 2021, the follow-up period was 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether LNG-IUS was used after surgery: the Hysteroscopic Polypectomy group (<i>n</i> = 812) and the Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Combined with LNG-IUS group (<i>n</i> = 348). Based on the analysis, two multivariate logistic regression models were constructed: the first model included only the factors with significant differences from the statistical analysis, while the second model additionally included the treatment method. The predictive abilities of the two models for polyp recurrence were compared. The recurrence-free survival time differences between the two treatment methods were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that birth history, menstrual symptoms, quality of life, and treatment method were significantly associated with polyp recurrence. In multivariate logistic regression models, the second model, which included the treatment method, had a higher AUC (0.703) compared to the first model (AUC = 0.676), which included only significant factors. The recurrence-free survival rate in the group that received hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS was significantly higher than in the hysteroscopic polypectomy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS significantly reduces polyp recurrence and extends recurrence-free survival time. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicates that including the treatment method improves the predictive ability of the model, suggesting that combined treatment plays an important role in reducing polyp recurrence and is worthy of further clinical promotion and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1557877"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1557877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hysteroscopic polypectomy is a common method for treating endometrial polyps, but postoperative recurrence remains a key concern. Recently, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been suggested to reduce the recurrence rate of polyps. This study aims to investigate the differences in recurrence rates and recurrence-free survival times between hysteroscopic polypectomy alone and hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS, and to assess their impact on recurrence.

Methods: This study retrospectively included clinical data from 1,160 patients with endometrial polyps from 2020 to 2021, the follow-up period was 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether LNG-IUS was used after surgery: the Hysteroscopic Polypectomy group (n = 812) and the Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Combined with LNG-IUS group (n = 348). Based on the analysis, two multivariate logistic regression models were constructed: the first model included only the factors with significant differences from the statistical analysis, while the second model additionally included the treatment method. The predictive abilities of the two models for polyp recurrence were compared. The recurrence-free survival time differences between the two treatment methods were also analyzed.

Results: Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that birth history, menstrual symptoms, quality of life, and treatment method were significantly associated with polyp recurrence. In multivariate logistic regression models, the second model, which included the treatment method, had a higher AUC (0.703) compared to the first model (AUC = 0.676), which included only significant factors. The recurrence-free survival rate in the group that received hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS was significantly higher than in the hysteroscopic polypectomy group.

Conclusion: Hysteroscopic polypectomy combined with LNG-IUS significantly reduces polyp recurrence and extends recurrence-free survival time. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicates that including the treatment method improves the predictive ability of the model, suggesting that combined treatment plays an important role in reducing polyp recurrence and is worthy of further clinical promotion and application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉切除术联合 LNG-IUS 治疗对息肉复发的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
背景:宫腔镜息肉切除术是治疗子宫内膜息肉的常用方法,但术后复发仍然是一个关键问题。近年来,左炔诺孕酮宫内系统(LNG-IUS)被认为可以降低息肉的复发率。本研究旨在探讨单纯宫腔镜息肉切除术与宫腔镜息肉切除术联合LNG-IUS在复发率和无复发生存时间上的差异,并评估其对复发的影响。方法:本研究回顾性纳入2020 - 2021年1160例子宫内膜息肉患者的临床资料,随访1年。根据术后是否使用LNG-IUS将患者分为宫腔镜息肉切除组(n = 812)和宫腔镜息肉切除联合LNG-IUS组(n = 348)。在此基础上,构建了两个多元logistic回归模型:第一个模型只包括统计分析中差异显著的因素,第二个模型增加了处理方法。比较两种模型对息肉复发的预测能力。分析两种治疗方法的无复发生存时间差异。结果:单因素logistic回归分析显示,生育史、月经症状、生活质量和治疗方法与息肉复发有显著相关性。在多元logistic回归模型中,包含处理方法的第二个模型的AUC(0.703)高于只包含显著因素的第一个模型(AUC = 0.676)。宫腔镜息肉切除联合LNG-IUS组的无复发生存率明显高于宫腔镜息肉切除组。结论:宫腔镜下息肉切除术联合LNG-IUS可显著降低息肉复发率,延长无复发生存期。多因素logistic回归分析表明,纳入治疗方法提高了模型的预测能力,提示联合治疗对减少息肉复发有重要作用,值得进一步临床推广应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive identification of risk factors for recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy-assisted treatment of giant cell tumor of the proximal femur: a case report. Cervical spondylosis with propriospinal myoclonus and vocalization: a case report. A meta-analysis of complications of thread lifting. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the middle ear: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1