A systematic review and meta-analysis on the characteristics of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment protocols for patients with Alzheimer's disease.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1177/13872877251325887
Kenji Fuseya, Yu Mimura, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Koji Kasanuki, Yoshihiro Noda
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis on the characteristics of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment protocols for patients with Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Kenji Fuseya, Yu Mimura, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Koji Kasanuki, Yoshihiro Noda","doi":"10.1177/13872877251325887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative condition causing dementia. Currently, there has been no established non-pharmacological treatment for cognitive decline in patients with AD. Recent evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be effective as a non-invasive treatment for improving cognitive function in AD.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the characteristics of rTMS treatment protocols for patients with ADMethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search on clinical trials on rTMS for improving cognitive decline in patients with AD, using the PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases and performed a meta-analysis according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. To clarify which cognitive domains in AD are improved by rTMS, meta-analyses were conducted on both global cognitive function and on each cognitive domain including verbal memory, processing speed, and executive function. In addition, sub-analyses of the treatment details of rTMS parameters including stimulation sites, stimulation frequency, stimulation intensity, and with/without the neuro-navigation technique and meta-regression analyses adjusting for gender, education, and the number of rTMS pulses were performed.ResultsThe results showed significant improvements in global cognitive function, while no significant findings in verbal memory, processing speed and executive function. No significant results were found in subgroup analysis or meta-regression.ConclusionsTo enrich the evidence for cognitive enhancement in AD with rTMS, the randomized controlled trials using a unified rTMS protocol with a larger sample size are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"28-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251325887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative condition causing dementia. Currently, there has been no established non-pharmacological treatment for cognitive decline in patients with AD. Recent evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be effective as a non-invasive treatment for improving cognitive function in AD.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the characteristics of rTMS treatment protocols for patients with ADMethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search on clinical trials on rTMS for improving cognitive decline in patients with AD, using the PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases and performed a meta-analysis according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. To clarify which cognitive domains in AD are improved by rTMS, meta-analyses were conducted on both global cognitive function and on each cognitive domain including verbal memory, processing speed, and executive function. In addition, sub-analyses of the treatment details of rTMS parameters including stimulation sites, stimulation frequency, stimulation intensity, and with/without the neuro-navigation technique and meta-regression analyses adjusting for gender, education, and the number of rTMS pulses were performed.ResultsThe results showed significant improvements in global cognitive function, while no significant findings in verbal memory, processing speed and executive function. No significant results were found in subgroup analysis or meta-regression.ConclusionsTo enrich the evidence for cognitive enhancement in AD with rTMS, the randomized controlled trials using a unified rTMS protocol with a larger sample size are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于阿尔茨海默病患者经颅磁刺激治疗方案特点的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的导致痴呆的神经退行性疾病。目前,还没有确定的非药物治疗AD患者认知能力下降的方法。最近的证据表明,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可能是一种有效的非侵入性治疗,以改善AD患者的认知功能。目的:本研究旨在探讨AD患者rTMS治疗方案的特点。方法:使用PubMed、PsycINFO和Scopus数据库,对rTMS改善AD患者认知能力下降的临床试验进行了系统的文献检索,并根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行了荟萃分析。为了阐明rTMS对AD患者的哪些认知领域有改善,我们对整体认知功能和每个认知领域(包括言语记忆、处理速度和执行功能)进行了meta分析。此外,还对rTMS参数的治疗细节进行了亚分析,包括刺激部位、刺激频率、刺激强度、是否使用神经导航技术,并对性别、教育程度和rTMS脉冲数进行了调整后的meta回归分析。结果治疗组整体认知功能有明显改善,言语记忆、处理速度和执行功能无明显改善。亚组分析和meta回归均未发现显著性结果。结论为了丰富rTMS对AD认知增强的证据,有必要采用统一的rTMS方案进行更大样本量的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Herpes zoster, antiviral therapy, and Alzheimer's disease: Turning association into an actionable prevention pathway. Randomized, double-blind study of zervimesine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Patients' and care partners' views on communicating the cause of dementia and related uncertainties: A qualitative study. Inflammation-related miR-155-5p as an APOE ε4-modulated biomarker for amyloid pathology in mild cognitive impairment. TREM2 deficiency delays postnatal microglial maturation and synaptic pruning, leading to anxiety-like behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1