Parallel transmit 7T MRI for adult epilepsy pre-surgical evaluation.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1111/epi.18353
Krzysztof Klodowski, Minghao Zhang, Jian P Jen, Daniel J Scoffings, Robert Morris, Victoria Lupson, Franck Mauconduit, Aurélien Massire, Vincent Gras, Nicolas Boulant, Christopher T Rodgers, Thomas E Cope
{"title":"Parallel transmit 7T MRI for adult epilepsy pre-surgical evaluation.","authors":"Krzysztof Klodowski, Minghao Zhang, Jian P Jen, Daniel J Scoffings, Robert Morris, Victoria Lupson, Franck Mauconduit, Aurélien Massire, Vincent Gras, Nicolas Boulant, Christopher T Rodgers, Thomas E Cope","doi":"10.1111/epi.18353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To implement parallel transmit (pTx) 7T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-surgical evaluation of 3T-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and to compare quality to conventional single transmit (specifically, circularly polarized [CP]) 7T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a comparative protocol comprising both pTx and CP 7T MRI in consecutive adult candidates for epilepsy surgery who had negative or equivocal 3T MRI imaging. Here we report the outcomes from the first 31 patients. We acquired pTx and CP T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and edge-enhancing gradient echo (EDGE) images, all in the same three-dimensional (3D) 0.8 mm isotropic space. Two-dimensional (2D) high-resolution T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>*-weighted sequences were acquired only in CP mode due to current technological limitations. Two neuroradiologists, a neurologist, and a neurosurgeon made independent, blinded quality and preference ratings of pTx vs CP images. Quantitative methods were used to assess signal dropout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7T revealed previously-unseen structural lesions in nine patients (29%), confirmed 3T-equivocal lesions in four patients (13%), and disproved 3T-equivocal lesions in four patients (13%). Lesions were better visualized on pTx than CP in 57% of cases, and never better visualized on CP. Clinical management was altered by 7T in 18 cases (58%). Nine cases were offered surgical resection and one laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Three cases were removed from the surgical pathway because of bilateral or extensive lesions. Five cases were offered stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) with better targeting (in three because the 7T lesion was deemed equivocal by the multi-disciplinary team (MDT), and in two because the lesion was extensive). Blinded comparison confirmed significantly better overall quality of pTx FLAIR images (F(2, 184) = 13.7, p = 2.88 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), whereas pTx MP2RAGE images were subjectively non-inferior and had improved temporal lobe coverage with quantitatively less signal drop-out.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>pTx-7T is implementable in a clinical pathway, changed management in 58% of patients where 3T + FDG-PET had not enabled resection, and is superior to single transmit 7T MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To implement parallel transmit (pTx) 7T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-surgical evaluation of 3T-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and to compare quality to conventional single transmit (specifically, circularly polarized [CP]) 7T MRI.

Methods: We implemented a comparative protocol comprising both pTx and CP 7T MRI in consecutive adult candidates for epilepsy surgery who had negative or equivocal 3T MRI imaging. Here we report the outcomes from the first 31 patients. We acquired pTx and CP T1, T2, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and edge-enhancing gradient echo (EDGE) images, all in the same three-dimensional (3D) 0.8 mm isotropic space. Two-dimensional (2D) high-resolution T2 and T2*-weighted sequences were acquired only in CP mode due to current technological limitations. Two neuroradiologists, a neurologist, and a neurosurgeon made independent, blinded quality and preference ratings of pTx vs CP images. Quantitative methods were used to assess signal dropout.

Results: 7T revealed previously-unseen structural lesions in nine patients (29%), confirmed 3T-equivocal lesions in four patients (13%), and disproved 3T-equivocal lesions in four patients (13%). Lesions were better visualized on pTx than CP in 57% of cases, and never better visualized on CP. Clinical management was altered by 7T in 18 cases (58%). Nine cases were offered surgical resection and one laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Three cases were removed from the surgical pathway because of bilateral or extensive lesions. Five cases were offered stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) with better targeting (in three because the 7T lesion was deemed equivocal by the multi-disciplinary team (MDT), and in two because the lesion was extensive). Blinded comparison confirmed significantly better overall quality of pTx FLAIR images (F(2, 184) = 13.7, p = 2.88 × 10-6), whereas pTx MP2RAGE images were subjectively non-inferior and had improved temporal lobe coverage with quantitatively less signal drop-out.

Significance: pTx-7T is implementable in a clinical pathway, changed management in 58% of patients where 3T + FDG-PET had not enabled resection, and is superior to single transmit 7T MRI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的在对 3T 阴性的耐药局灶性癫痫患者进行手术前评估时采用平行传输(pTx)7T 磁共振成像(MRI),并将其质量与传统的单传输(特别是圆极化 [CP] )7T 磁共振成像进行比较:方法:我们对 3T MRI 成像阴性或不明确的连续成年癫痫手术候选者实施了包括 pTx 和 CP 7T MRI 的比较方案。我们在此报告首批 31 名患者的治疗结果。我们采集了 pTx 和 CP T1、T2、流体增强反转恢复(FLAIR)和边缘增强梯度回波(EDGE)图像,所有图像都在同一三维(3D)0.8 毫米各向同性空间中。由于目前的技术限制,二维(2D)高分辨率 T2 和 T2* 加权序列仅在 CP 模式下采集。两名神经放射科医生、一名神经科医生和一名神经外科医生对 pTx 和 CP 图像进行了独立、盲法的质量和偏好评级。定量方法用于评估信号丢失:7T显示了9名患者(29%)之前未发现的结构性病变,确认了4名患者(13%)的3T等焦病变,推翻了4名患者(13%)的3T等焦病变。在 57% 的病例中,pTx 比 CP 能更好地观察病变,而 CP 从未能更好地观察病变。有 18 例患者(58%)的临床治疗因 7T 而改变。九例病例接受了手术切除,一例接受了激光间质热疗(LITT)。三例病例因双侧或广泛病变而被排除在手术路径之外。五例病例接受了目标更明确的立体脑电图(sEEG)检查(其中三例是因为多学科小组(MDT)认为 7T 病变不明确,两例是因为病变范围广)。盲法比较证实,pTx FLAIR 图像的整体质量明显更好(F(2, 184) = 13.7, p = 2.88 × 10-6),而 pTx MP2RAGE 图像主观上并不逊色,而且颞叶覆盖范围更广,定量信号丢失更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of lacosamide, levetiracetam, and valproate as second-line therapy in adult status epilepticus: Analysis of a large cohort. Increased NaV1.2 expression and its interaction with CaM contribute to the hyperexcitability induced by prolonged inhibition of CaMKII. Long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes of patients with ring chromosome 20 syndrome: A cohort study of 47 cases. Medication-resistant epilepsy is associated with a unique gut microbiota signature. Mitochondrial respiration defects in lymphoblast cell lines from patients with Dravet syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1