Long-term visual outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-VEGF therapy lost to follow-up.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s00417-025-06798-6
Ki Tae Nam, Cheolmin Yun
{"title":"Long-term visual outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-VEGF therapy lost to follow-up.","authors":"Ki Tae Nam, Cheolmin Yun","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06798-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the long-term visual outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) during treatment compared with those with continuous follow-up (CFU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD who received anti-VEGF therapy from 2010 to 2022. The patients were classified into the long-term LTFU group (LTFU for more than 6 months), the short-term LTFU group (LTFU for 2 months to less than 6 months), and the CFU group. We conducted a comparative analysis of baseline characteristics, factors related to visual prognosis, and differences in the occurrence of severe vision loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 169 patients were classified into 43 in the long-term LTFU group, 57 in the short-term LTFU group, and 69 in the CFU group. The mean follow-up duration was 57.12 ± 31.68 months. There was no significant difference in baseline visual acuity (logMAR) among the long-term LTFU, short-term LTFU, and CFU groups (0.76 ± 0.54, 0.68 ± 0.51, and 0.72 ± 0.54, respectively; P = 0.734). The final visual acuity was significantly lower in the long-term LTFU group (1.12 ± 0.79) compared with the short-term LTFU group (0.65 ± 0.62) and the CFU group (0.65 ± 0.56) (P < 0.001), and the change in visual acuity was significantly greater in the long-term LTFU group (0.36 ± 0.69) compared with the short-term LTFU group (-0.03 ± 0.64) and the CFU group (-0.07 ± 0.58) (P = 0.001). Long-term LTFU was significantly associated with changes in visual acuity from the baseline to the final visit (P = 0.002) and severe vision loss (P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with neovascular AMD, those LTFU for more than six months during treatment had worse long-term visual outcomes compared to those with regular follow-up or shorter LTFU durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1837-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06798-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term visual outcomes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) during treatment compared with those with continuous follow-up (CFU).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD who received anti-VEGF therapy from 2010 to 2022. The patients were classified into the long-term LTFU group (LTFU for more than 6 months), the short-term LTFU group (LTFU for 2 months to less than 6 months), and the CFU group. We conducted a comparative analysis of baseline characteristics, factors related to visual prognosis, and differences in the occurrence of severe vision loss.

Results: A total of 169 patients were classified into 43 in the long-term LTFU group, 57 in the short-term LTFU group, and 69 in the CFU group. The mean follow-up duration was 57.12 ± 31.68 months. There was no significant difference in baseline visual acuity (logMAR) among the long-term LTFU, short-term LTFU, and CFU groups (0.76 ± 0.54, 0.68 ± 0.51, and 0.72 ± 0.54, respectively; P = 0.734). The final visual acuity was significantly lower in the long-term LTFU group (1.12 ± 0.79) compared with the short-term LTFU group (0.65 ± 0.62) and the CFU group (0.65 ± 0.56) (P < 0.001), and the change in visual acuity was significantly greater in the long-term LTFU group (0.36 ± 0.69) compared with the short-term LTFU group (-0.03 ± 0.64) and the CFU group (-0.07 ± 0.58) (P = 0.001). Long-term LTFU was significantly associated with changes in visual acuity from the baseline to the final visit (P = 0.002) and severe vision loss (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: In patients with neovascular AMD, those LTFU for more than six months during treatment had worse long-term visual outcomes compared to those with regular follow-up or shorter LTFU durations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受抗vegf治疗的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的长期视力结果缺乏随访。
目的:评价在治疗期间失访(LTFU)的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者与连续随访(CFU)患者的长期视力结果。方法:回顾性研究2010 - 2022年诊断为新生血管性AMD并接受抗vegf治疗的患者。将患者分为长期LTFU组(LTFU持续6个月以上)、短期LTFU组(LTFU持续2个月至6个月以下)和CFU组。我们对基线特征、与视力预后相关的因素以及发生严重视力丧失的差异进行了比较分析。结果:169例患者分为长期LTFU组43例,短期LTFU组57例,CFU组69例。平均随访时间57.12±31.68个月。长期LTFU组、短期LTFU组和CFU组的基线视力(logMAR)分别为0.76±0.54、0.68±0.51和0.72±0.54,差异无统计学意义;p = 0.734)。长期LTFU组的最终视力(1.12±0.79)明显低于短期LTFU组(0.65±0.62)和CFU组(0.65±0.56)(P结论:在新生血管性AMD患者中,LTFU治疗期间超过6个月的患者的长期视力结果较常规随访或LTFU持续时间较短的患者差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Reply on comments on the paper "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". Letter to the editor regarding "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". Acute intraocular pressure responses changes during dynamic resistance training in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and age-matched controls. Exploration of the cutoff values of axial length that is susceptible to develop advanced primary open angle glaucoma in patients aged less than 50 years. Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Patients Undergoing Supraciliary Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1