Ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency and critical care nursing in Western Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-method qualitative study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5
Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Mastewal Ayehu Sinshaw
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency and critical care nursing in Western Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-method qualitative study.","authors":"Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Mastewal Ayehu Sinshaw","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.

Objective: This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.

Methods: A multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.

Results: The study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier.

Conclusion and recommendation: Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations.

Clinical trial registration: The study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西北部西阿姆哈拉地区急诊和重症护理中的伦理困境与决策:一项采用多种方法的定性研究。
背景:急诊和重症护理中的伦理困境通常涉及复杂的决策,影响患者的预后、医疗保健提供者的情绪健康和团队动态。在这种情况下,了解这些困境和所涉及的决策过程对于改善护理实践和患者结果至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨急诊重症护理护士的伦理困境及其决策过程。方法伦理决策框架。方法:采用多方法定性方法,结合深度个人访谈(IDI)、焦点小组讨论(FGD)和案例研究来捕捉不同的观点。通过有目的抽样,收集了在Tibebe Ghion专科医院和Felege Hiwot综合专科医院急诊和重症监护部门工作的28名护士的数据。访谈和焦点小组被录音,用阿姆哈拉语逐字转录,翻译成英语,并输入到OpenCode软件中进行分析。采用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果:该研究揭示了护士面临的几个关键伦理困境,包括平衡患者自主与慈善,危机期间有限资源的分配,阿片类药物用于疼痛管理与呼吸抑制,以及关于知情同意的冲突。护士报告了这些困境对情感和职业的影响,造成了道德困扰、倦怠和道德疲劳。护士强调跨学科合作和结构化决策框架的重要性,以应对这些挑战。然而,在关键时刻缺乏持续的道德咨询和同伴支持被认为是一个重大障碍。结论和建议:护士遇到复杂的道德困境,影响他们的情绪健康和工作满意度。有效的决策需要应用道德原则,遵守指导方针,并咨询同行。该研究表明,需要改进支持系统,包括更频繁和全面的道德培训,更好地获得道德咨询,以及在高压情况下指导决策的结构化框架。临床试验注册:该研究不是临床试验,不适用临床试验编号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
A randomized controlled trial comparing visual-based and traditional educational materials in radiotherapy patient education: implications for nursing practice. Integrating advanced practice nurses into the health system: views from nurses and healthcare managers - a qualitative study. Drawing a sword to assist? How colleague's experienced abuse motivates helping behavior among nurses. Disaster preparedness in hospices and specialized home palliative care services in Germany: a cross-sectional survey of team-leading nurses. Artificial intelligence literacy and academic resilience in undergraduate nursing students: the mediating role of self-efficacy and artificial intelligence anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1