Influence of different implant designs on stress distributions in all-on-four concept: A finite element analysis

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2025.02.032
Hasan Öztürk , Mehtap Muğlalı , Rabia Tül Adeviye Çankaya
{"title":"Influence of different implant designs on stress distributions in all-on-four concept: A finite element analysis","authors":"Hasan Öztürk ,&nbsp;Mehtap Muğlalı ,&nbsp;Rabia Tül Adeviye Çankaya","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study aims to investigate the effect of different implant designs on stress distribution on the implant and mandibular bone in the All-on-four treatment concept using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). A 3D FEA model was constructed based on the edentulous mandible's mean value. Eight different implant designs, consisting of two main groups with conical and cylindrical body geometry and four subgroups with four different thread designs, v-shaped, square, buttress, and reversible buttress in each group, were experimentally created in a computer environment. Implants 13 and 15 mm in length were inserted between the mental foraminas according to the All-on-Four concept, and the model was completed with an acrylic hybrid prosthesis created in a computer environment. A total force of 300N was applied with an oblique angle of 75° to the occlusal plane on the premolar and 1st molar teeth. Von Mises stresses (VMS) on the implants, and minimum principal stresses (Pmin) on the cortical and trabecular bones were evaluated using the 3D FEA. VMS and Pmin were lower in the cortical bone around conical, square-thread implants. Stress levels were highest on the cortical bone at the implant neck in all groups, with greater stress observed around posteriorly inclined implants. No direct relationship with trabecular bone was identified. Given the study's limitations, the results suggest using conical squared implants in the All-on-Four concept.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"53 7","pages":"Pages 911-920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518225000848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the effect of different implant designs on stress distribution on the implant and mandibular bone in the All-on-four treatment concept using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). A 3D FEA model was constructed based on the edentulous mandible's mean value. Eight different implant designs, consisting of two main groups with conical and cylindrical body geometry and four subgroups with four different thread designs, v-shaped, square, buttress, and reversible buttress in each group, were experimentally created in a computer environment. Implants 13 and 15 mm in length were inserted between the mental foraminas according to the All-on-Four concept, and the model was completed with an acrylic hybrid prosthesis created in a computer environment. A total force of 300N was applied with an oblique angle of 75° to the occlusal plane on the premolar and 1st molar teeth. Von Mises stresses (VMS) on the implants, and minimum principal stresses (Pmin) on the cortical and trabecular bones were evaluated using the 3D FEA. VMS and Pmin were lower in the cortical bone around conical, square-thread implants. Stress levels were highest on the cortical bone at the implant neck in all groups, with greater stress observed around posteriorly inclined implants. No direct relationship with trabecular bone was identified. Given the study's limitations, the results suggest using conical squared implants in the All-on-Four concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同种植体设计对全对四概念应力分布的影响:有限元分析。
本研究旨在利用三维(3D)有限元分析(FEA)探讨在All-on-four治疗理念下,不同种植体设计对种植体和下颌骨应力分布的影响。根据无牙下颌骨的平均值建立三维有限元模型。在计算机环境下实验创建了八种不同的种植体设计,包括两组主要的锥形和圆柱形体几何形状,以及四组四种不同的螺纹设计,分别是v形、方形、支撑和可逆支撑。根据All-on-Four概念,在精神孔之间插入长度为13和15毫米的植入物,并用在计算机环境中创建的丙烯酸混合假体完成模型。在前磨牙和第一磨牙的咬合面上施加总力300N,倾斜角度为75°。利用三维有限元分析评估植入物的Von Mises应力(VMS)、皮质骨和小梁骨的最小主应力(Pmin)。在锥形、方螺纹种植体周围的皮质骨中VMS和Pmin较低。各组种植体颈部皮质骨的应力水平最高,后倾斜种植体周围的应力水平更高。未发现与小梁骨有直接关系。考虑到研究的局限性,结果建议在All-on-Four概念中使用锥形方形植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Long-term effect of anterior maxillary distraction using the VINK appliance - Retropalatal and Retroglossal airway change. Lingual lymph node occurrence and metastasis in early-stage tongue cancer: An indicator for aggressive excision. Condylar morphology in skeletal Class II malocclusion: relationship to mandibular retrognathia and airway stenosis. Representation of race and sex in maxillomandibular advancement sleep apnea publications - a systematic review. Facial nerve palsy in parotid gland surgery: A comprehensive analysis of incidence, severity, duration, and risk factors; insights from the Polish Salivary Network Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1