Perioperative Outcomes of Limited Sobriety Versus Standard Sobriety Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Disease.

Sue Fu, Jenny H Pan, Haaris Kadri, Caitlin Contag, Jessica Ferguson, Mai Sedki, Allison Kwong, Aparna Goel, Marc L Melcher
{"title":"Perioperative Outcomes of Limited Sobriety Versus Standard Sobriety Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Disease.","authors":"Sue Fu, Jenny H Pan, Haaris Kadri, Caitlin Contag, Jessica Ferguson, Mai Sedki, Allison Kwong, Aparna Goel, Marc L Melcher","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol-associated liver disease is now the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in the context of liver transplantation for patients with less than 6 months of abstinence from alcohol. To determine whether patients with less than 6 months of sobriety have worse perioperative outcomes than those with standard sobriety requirements, we performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing limited and standard sobriety patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation from May 2018 to October 2022 at a single academic tertiary transplant center. The limited sobriety cohort comprised adult patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to alcohol use disorder who presented with their first episode of hepatic decompensation, with less than 6 months of sobriety. This group was compared with a standard sobriety cohort, consisting of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease with more than 6 months of sobriety. A total of 169 patients were selected for analysis, with 58 in the limited sobriety group and 111 in the standard sobriety group. The limited- sobriety group was younger (median 42 years vs 54 years; P < .01) and had more severe liver disease than the standard sobriety group (median Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 39 vs 34; P < .01) at the time of transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the 2 groups. Despite having more severe liver disease, the limited sobriety management pathway was not associated with worse perioperative outcomes than the standard sobriety pathway. Our findings indicate liver transplantation in patients with limited sobriety do not require increased perioperative resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.02.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alcohol-associated liver disease is now the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in the context of liver transplantation for patients with less than 6 months of abstinence from alcohol. To determine whether patients with less than 6 months of sobriety have worse perioperative outcomes than those with standard sobriety requirements, we performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing limited and standard sobriety patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation from May 2018 to October 2022 at a single academic tertiary transplant center. The limited sobriety cohort comprised adult patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to alcohol use disorder who presented with their first episode of hepatic decompensation, with less than 6 months of sobriety. This group was compared with a standard sobriety cohort, consisting of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease with more than 6 months of sobriety. A total of 169 patients were selected for analysis, with 58 in the limited sobriety group and 111 in the standard sobriety group. The limited- sobriety group was younger (median 42 years vs 54 years; P < .01) and had more severe liver disease than the standard sobriety group (median Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 39 vs 34; P < .01) at the time of transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the 2 groups. Despite having more severe liver disease, the limited sobriety management pathway was not associated with worse perioperative outcomes than the standard sobriety pathway. Our findings indicate liver transplantation in patients with limited sobriety do not require increased perioperative resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国,戒酒不足 6 个月的患者接受肝移植时,酒精相关性肝病是目前肝移植的主要适应症。为了确定戒酒少于 6 个月的患者是否比符合标准戒酒要求的患者围手术期预后更差,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 2018 年 5 月至 2022 年 10 月在一家学术性三级移植中心接受正位肝移植的有限戒酒和标准戒酒患者。有限清醒队列包括因酒精使用障碍而继发终末期肝病的成年患者,他们首次出现肝功能失代偿,清醒时间少于 6 个月。该组患者与标准清醒组进行了比较,标准清醒组由清醒时间超过 6 个月的酒精相关性肝病患者组成。共有169名患者被选中进行分析,其中58人属于有限清醒组,111人属于标准清醒组。有限清醒组比标准清醒组更年轻(中位数分别为 42 岁和 54 岁;P < .01),移植时的肝病也更严重(终末期肝病模型评分中位数分别为 39 分和 34 分;P < .01)。两组的主要结果在统计学上没有显著差异。尽管肝病更严重,但有限清醒管理路径的围手术期结果并不比标准清醒路径差。我们的研究结果表明,有限清醒患者进行肝移植并不需要增加围手术期资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplant Does Not Offer Any Mortality Benefits: A Study of Trends in Pre-Emptive Kidney Transplantation Over the Last Two Decades. Efficacy and Safety of Oropharyngeal Probiotic BP-OM1 on Respiratory Infection-Like Symptoms Among Patients With Lymphoma After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Compared to Insulin for Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus After Solid Organ Transplant. Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Iatrogenic Vascular Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Case Report. Impact of Empagliflozin on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Rate Variability in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1