Exploring currently available fibroblast activation protein targeting molecules in adrenocortical carcinoma: Navigating theranostic pathways

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4
Sejal Chopra, Jaya Shukla, Priyavrat Purohit, Umanath Adhikari, Frank Roesch, Euy Sung Moon, Yogesh Rathore, Nivedita Rana, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Rama Walia
{"title":"Exploring currently available fibroblast activation protein targeting molecules in adrenocortical carcinoma: Navigating theranostic pathways","authors":"Sejal Chopra, Jaya Shukla, Priyavrat Purohit, Umanath Adhikari, Frank Roesch, Euy Sung Moon, Yogesh Rathore, Nivedita Rana, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Rama Walia","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) expressing fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in the adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) microenvironment may be used as potential therapeutic targets. This study investigated the diagnostic potential of four FAPi derivatives i.e. DOTA-FAPi-46 (FAPi46), DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi), DATA<sup>5m</sup><sub>.</sub>SA.FAPi (DATA.FAPi) and DATA<sup>5m</sup><sub>.</sub>C4.FAPi (C4.FAPi) and compared with standard-of-care <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (FDG) in ACC.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Thirty histopathological proven cases of localized or metastatic ACC were recruited for both FDG and FAPi PET (number of patients (n) = 5 for SA.FAPi, n = 5 for DATA.FAPi, n = 5 for C4.FAPi and n = 15 for FAPi46). For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV’s) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), total lesion glycolysis (TLG for FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for FAPi).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In overall analysis, both FAPi and FDG PET exhibited comparable mean SUL<sub>peak</sub> [FAPi 4.3 (8.0–1.7) vs FDG 3.9 (8.1–2.5), p-0.271], mean SUL<sub>avg</sub> [2.2 (4.3–1.2) vs 2.2 (3.4–1.3), p-0.897] and mean TBR [1.8 (3.2–1.2) vs 1.9 (2.7–1.2), p-0.696]. In volumetric analysis, comparable mean TLF and mean TLG was noted for the cohort [9.3 (53.7–4.5) vs 11.8 (33.0–4.3), p-0.107]. Sub-categorical analysis demonstrated complete concordant findings for both radiotracers in detection of all primary lesions, nodal lesions and distant metastases in lung and peritoneum with discordant findings in liver (22%) and skeletal lesions (33%). For lesion detection, DATA.FAPi and FAPi46 showed 100% concordance with FDG scan findings in metastatic disease. SA.FAPi exhibited 33% discordance by detecting an additional skeletal lesion, while C4.FAPi had 10% discordance, missing one liver lesion identified by FDG. Three <sup>68</sup> Ga-FAP derivatives (SA.FAPi, DATA.FAPi, and C4.FAPi) exhibited similar biodistribution, with uptake in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles, and kidneys, and variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa, and uterus. In contrast, FAPi46 physiological expression was noted in salivary glands and muscles, with no uptake in other organs. Pancreatic uptake was highest for SA.FAPi (SUVmean 11.8), DATA.FAPi (12.1), and C4.FAPi (10.8), while FAPi46 had the lowest (1.7). Conversely, FAPi46 exhibited the highest muscle uptake (SUVmean 4.3) compared to SA.FAPi (1.7), DATA.FAPi (1.4), and C4.FAPi (1.0).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>All the existing FAP inhibitor molecules were comparable to FDG PET for mapping disease spread and appeared as potential theranostic targets for the management of ACC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07203-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) expressing fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in the adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) microenvironment may be used as potential therapeutic targets. This study investigated the diagnostic potential of four FAPi derivatives i.e. DOTA-FAPi-46 (FAPi46), DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi), DATA5m.SA.FAPi (DATA.FAPi) and DATA5m.C4.FAPi (C4.FAPi) and compared with standard-of-care 18F-FDG (FDG) in ACC.

Methods

Thirty histopathological proven cases of localized or metastatic ACC were recruited for both FDG and FAPi PET (number of patients (n) = 5 for SA.FAPi, n = 5 for DATA.FAPi, n = 5 for C4.FAPi and n = 15 for FAPi46). For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV’s) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), total lesion glycolysis (TLG for FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for FAPi).

Results

In overall analysis, both FAPi and FDG PET exhibited comparable mean SULpeak [FAPi 4.3 (8.0–1.7) vs FDG 3.9 (8.1–2.5), p-0.271], mean SULavg [2.2 (4.3–1.2) vs 2.2 (3.4–1.3), p-0.897] and mean TBR [1.8 (3.2–1.2) vs 1.9 (2.7–1.2), p-0.696]. In volumetric analysis, comparable mean TLF and mean TLG was noted for the cohort [9.3 (53.7–4.5) vs 11.8 (33.0–4.3), p-0.107]. Sub-categorical analysis demonstrated complete concordant findings for both radiotracers in detection of all primary lesions, nodal lesions and distant metastases in lung and peritoneum with discordant findings in liver (22%) and skeletal lesions (33%). For lesion detection, DATA.FAPi and FAPi46 showed 100% concordance with FDG scan findings in metastatic disease. SA.FAPi exhibited 33% discordance by detecting an additional skeletal lesion, while C4.FAPi had 10% discordance, missing one liver lesion identified by FDG. Three 68 Ga-FAP derivatives (SA.FAPi, DATA.FAPi, and C4.FAPi) exhibited similar biodistribution, with uptake in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles, and kidneys, and variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa, and uterus. In contrast, FAPi46 physiological expression was noted in salivary glands and muscles, with no uptake in other organs. Pancreatic uptake was highest for SA.FAPi (SUVmean 11.8), DATA.FAPi (12.1), and C4.FAPi (10.8), while FAPi46 had the lowest (1.7). Conversely, FAPi46 exhibited the highest muscle uptake (SUVmean 4.3) compared to SA.FAPi (1.7), DATA.FAPi (1.4), and C4.FAPi (1.0).

Conclusion

All the existing FAP inhibitor molecules were comparable to FDG PET for mapping disease spread and appeared as potential theranostic targets for the management of ACC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索目前可用的成纤维细胞激活蛋白靶向分子在肾上腺皮质癌:导航治疗途径
在肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)微环境中表达成纤维细胞激活蛋白(FAP)的癌相关成纤维细胞(CAFs)可能被用作潜在的治疗靶点。本研究考察了4种FAPi衍生物DOTA-FAPi-46 (FAPi46)、DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi)、DATA5m.SA的诊断潜力。FAPi (DATA.FAPi)和DATA5m.C4。FAPi (C4.FAPi),并与ACC的标准护理18F-FDG (FDG)进行比较。方法招募30例经组织病理学证实的局限性或转移性ACC患者进行FDG和FAPi PET检查(SA患者数(n) = 5)。FAPi, n = 5对于DATA。FAPi, C4 n = 5。FAPi46, n = 15)。对于生物分布,标准化摄取值(SUV)是通过划定不同身体器官的兴趣区域来计算的。为了在疾病识别方面进行比较分析,病变示踪剂的摄取使用标准化摄取值进行量化,这些摄取值校正了瘦体重(SUL)、肿瘤与背景比(TBR)、病变总糖酵解(FDG)和病变总FAP表达(FAPi)。结果在总体分析中,FAPi和FDG PET的平均SULpeak [FAPi 4.3 (8.0-1.7) vs FDG 3.9 (8.1-2.5), p = 0.271],平均SULavg [2.2 (4.3 - 1.2) vs 2.2 (3.4-1.3), p = 0.897]和平均TBR [1.8 (3.2-1.2) vs 1.9 (2.7-1.2), p = 0.696]相当。在容量分析中,该队列的平均TLF和平均TLG可比较[9.3 (53.7-4.5)vs 11.8 (33.0-4.3), p = 0.107]。亚分类分析表明,两种放射性示踪剂在肺和腹膜的所有原发性病变、淋巴结病变和远处转移的检测结果完全一致,而在肝脏(22%)和骨骼病变(33%)的检测结果不一致。病变检测:DATA。FAPi和FAPi46与转移性疾病的FDG扫描结果100%一致。SA。FAPi通过检测额外的骨骼病变表现出33%的不一致性,而C4。FAPi有10%的不一致性,遗漏了FDG识别的一个肝脏病变。三种68 Ga-FAP衍生物(SA。FAPi,数据。FAPi(和C4.FAPi)表现出相似的生物分布,在唾液腺、甲状腺、肝脏、胰腺、肌肉和肾脏均有摄取,在泪腺、眼外肌、口腔黏膜和子宫有不同的摄取。相反,在唾液腺和肌肉中发现了FAPi46的生理表达,而在其他器官中没有摄取。胰腺对SA的摄取最高。FAPi (SUVmean 11.8), DATA。FAPi(12.1)和C4。FAPi (10.8), FAPi46最低(1.7)。相反,与SA相比,FAPi46表现出最高的肌肉摄取(SUVmean 4.3)。FAPi (1.7), DATA。FAPi(1.4)和C4。FAPi(1.0)。结论现有的FAP抑制剂分子均可与FDG PET相媲美,可作为控制ACC的潜在治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
coPERCIST: AI-assisted PET-CT response assessment. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in active surveillance: From imaging to informed decision-making - a "Whistling Arrow" perspective. An intra-patient contemporaneous comparison of 18F-piflufolastat and 18F-flotufolastat urinary radioactivity and pelvic region detection rates in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Value of a repeat 18F-flotufolastat PET scan following a negative scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy The confounding effects of microvascular physiology on the uptake and diagnostic accuracy of [18F]fluoroethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography in gliomas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1