Chromatographic interferences potentially inflating the levels of Δ9-THC in Cannabis Sativa plant samples and possible solutions

IF 4 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Chromatography A Pub Date : 2025-05-10 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465871
Walter B. Wilson , Andrea J. Yarberry , Stephen Goldman
{"title":"Chromatographic interferences potentially inflating the levels of Δ9-THC in Cannabis Sativa plant samples and possible solutions","authors":"Walter B. Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrea J. Yarberry ,&nbsp;Stephen Goldman","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers in the Chemical Sciences Division (CSD) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have been evaluating existing and developing new analytical methods for the differentiation of hemp and marijuana since the passage of the <em>Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018</em>. This legislation defined hemp as a <em>Cannabis sativa</em> plant containing 0.3 % or less Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and removed hemp from the United States Drug Enforcement Agency controlled substances list. The United States Department of Agriculture later clarified that this threshold must be representative of the total Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, which includes the Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC acidic precursor Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA). As a result, the burden of making these distinctions fell to forensic and <em>Cannabis</em> testing laboratories. NIST CSD has previously demonstrated accurate and precise analytical measurements for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC, Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA, and nine other related cannabinoids in well-characterized samples from interlaboratory studies at NIST by liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA) following a methanolic extraction. This publication expands this method for the first time to include 16 commercial hemp samples and 20 seized <em>Cannabis</em> samples, simulating the types of samples typically analyzed by forensic and <em>Cannabis</em> testing laboratories. The results presented here highlight chromatographic interferences from CBNA and synthetic Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC by-products for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC that can inflate its mass fraction levels and lead to the misidentification of <em>Cannabis</em> plant samples as marijuana when they are actually hemp. Data collected for 7448 plant samples in 2023 by a <em>Cannabis</em> testing laboratory were used to demonstrate the prevalence of these chromatographic interferences for the first time in a large sample population. Examples are included to demonstrate the resolution of chromatographic interferences through modification of the chromatographic method, selective detection methods, and peak deconvolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1748 ","pages":"Article 465871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325002195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers in the Chemical Sciences Division (CSD) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have been evaluating existing and developing new analytical methods for the differentiation of hemp and marijuana since the passage of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018. This legislation defined hemp as a Cannabis sativa plant containing 0.3 % or less Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and removed hemp from the United States Drug Enforcement Agency controlled substances list. The United States Department of Agriculture later clarified that this threshold must be representative of the total Δ9-THC, which includes the Δ9-THC acidic precursor Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA). As a result, the burden of making these distinctions fell to forensic and Cannabis testing laboratories. NIST CSD has previously demonstrated accurate and precise analytical measurements for Δ9-THC, Δ9-THCA, and nine other related cannabinoids in well-characterized samples from interlaboratory studies at NIST by liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection (LC-PDA) following a methanolic extraction. This publication expands this method for the first time to include 16 commercial hemp samples and 20 seized Cannabis samples, simulating the types of samples typically analyzed by forensic and Cannabis testing laboratories. The results presented here highlight chromatographic interferences from CBNA and synthetic Δ8-THC by-products for Δ9-THC that can inflate its mass fraction levels and lead to the misidentification of Cannabis plant samples as marijuana when they are actually hemp. Data collected for 7448 plant samples in 2023 by a Cannabis testing laboratory were used to demonstrate the prevalence of these chromatographic interferences for the first time in a large sample population. Examples are included to demonstrate the resolution of chromatographic interferences through modification of the chromatographic method, selective detection methods, and peak deconvolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
色谱干扰可能会使大麻植物样品和可能的溶液中Δ9-THC的水平升高。
自2018年《农业改进法案》通过以来,美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)化学科学部(CSD)的研究人员一直在评估现有的大麻和大麻区分分析方法,并开发新的分析方法。该立法将大麻定义为含有0.3%或更少Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)的大麻植物,并将大麻从美国缉毒局控制物质清单中删除。美国农业部后来澄清说,这一阈值必须代表总量Δ9-THC,其中包括Δ9-THC酸性前体Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic酸(Δ9-THCA)。因此,作出这些区分的重担落在了法医和大麻检测实验室身上。NIST CSD先前通过甲醇提取后的液相色谱与光电二极管阵列检测(LC-PDA),在NIST的实验室间研究中,对Δ9-THC, Δ9-THCA和其他九种相关大麻素进行了准确和精确的分析测量。本出版物首次扩展了这种方法,包括16个商业大麻样本和20个缉获大麻样本,模拟了法医和大麻测试实验室通常分析的样本类型。本文的结果强调了来自CBNA和Δ9-THC合成Δ8-THC副产物的色谱干扰,这些干扰会使其质量分数水平膨胀,导致大麻植物样品被误认为是大麻,而实际上它们是大麻。大麻检测实验室于2023年收集了7448份植物样本的数据,首次在大样本群体中证明了这些色谱干扰的普遍性。示例包括通过改进色谱方法、选择性检测方法和峰反褶积来演示色谱干扰的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Addition and update of compounds for the 2025 Wayne state university compound descriptor database for use with the solvation parameter model High-sensitivity MAM to support early-stage activities during biotherapeutic development Protein language model-guided generative design of affinity peptides for chromatographic purification of lentiviral vectors pH-mediated simultaneous and fast enrichment of NSAIDs and parabens in environmental and food samples using Schiff base network-1 functionalized magnetic sepiolite Integrative lipidomics profiles and explainable machine learning for species-specific identification of meat and bone meal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1