Perceptions of music listening for pain management: a multi-method study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097233
Emy S van der Valk Bouman, Antonia S Becker, Julian Schaap, Roos Cats, Michaël Berghman, M Klimek
{"title":"Perceptions of music listening for pain management: a multi-method study.","authors":"Emy S van der Valk Bouman, Antonia S Becker, Julian Schaap, Roos Cats, Michaël Berghman, M Klimek","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Music listening for pain relief is well studied in diverse healthcare settings, but its implementation remains challenging. While healthcare providers generally have a positive attitude, there is a lack of knowledge about healthcare recipients' perceptions and attitudes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore healthcare recipients' perceptions of listening to music for pain management, focusing on their general attitudes, implementation strategies and subjective experiences of how music helps (or does not help).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multi-method study comprising a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. It is a follow-up conducted 6 months after a randomised experimental study, which assessed the influence of different music genres on pain tolerance. At the end of the original experiment, participants received advice on listening to music in painful situations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rotterdam, The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The survey involved 169 participants (age mean 30.6, SD 9.8; 61.9% female) who participated in the initial trial. Following this, 20 in-depth interviews were conducted.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Perceptions of music for pain management were investigated, revealing general trends in the quantitative survey data. Data-led thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews focused on individual perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants showed a high willingness to use music for pain relief, particularly for so-called emotional pain (eg, anxiety, stress and heartbreak). Individual attitudes varied regarding different situations, types of music and types of pain. Barriers such as not considering the option and social sensitivity within healthcare contexts were discussed. A proactive approach by healthcare professionals and autonomy of healthcare recipients were suggested to overcome these barriers. Interestingly, the 'wrong' type of music or the 'wrong' situation were mentioned as non-beneficial or even harmful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Awareness of individual needs and potential negative effects is crucial for the use of music for pain relief. A proactive and personalised approach is needed to effectively implement music in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 3","pages":"e097233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Music listening for pain relief is well studied in diverse healthcare settings, but its implementation remains challenging. While healthcare providers generally have a positive attitude, there is a lack of knowledge about healthcare recipients' perceptions and attitudes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore healthcare recipients' perceptions of listening to music for pain management, focusing on their general attitudes, implementation strategies and subjective experiences of how music helps (or does not help).

Design: A multi-method study comprising a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. It is a follow-up conducted 6 months after a randomised experimental study, which assessed the influence of different music genres on pain tolerance. At the end of the original experiment, participants received advice on listening to music in painful situations.

Setting: Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Participants: The survey involved 169 participants (age mean 30.6, SD 9.8; 61.9% female) who participated in the initial trial. Following this, 20 in-depth interviews were conducted.

Outcome measures: Perceptions of music for pain management were investigated, revealing general trends in the quantitative survey data. Data-led thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews focused on individual perceptions.

Results: Participants showed a high willingness to use music for pain relief, particularly for so-called emotional pain (eg, anxiety, stress and heartbreak). Individual attitudes varied regarding different situations, types of music and types of pain. Barriers such as not considering the option and social sensitivity within healthcare contexts were discussed. A proactive approach by healthcare professionals and autonomy of healthcare recipients were suggested to overcome these barriers. Interestingly, the 'wrong' type of music or the 'wrong' situation were mentioned as non-beneficial or even harmful.

Conclusions: Awareness of individual needs and potential negative effects is crucial for the use of music for pain relief. A proactive and personalised approach is needed to effectively implement music in healthcare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听音乐对疼痛管理的感知:一项多方法研究。
目的:听音乐缓解疼痛在不同的医疗机构进行了很好的研究,但其实施仍然具有挑战性。虽然医疗保健提供者通常有积极的态度,但缺乏对医疗保健接受者的看法和态度的了解。因此,本研究的目的是探讨医疗保健接受者对听音乐治疗疼痛的看法,重点关注他们的一般态度、实施策略和音乐如何帮助(或没有帮助)的主观体验。设计:一项多方法研究,包括定量调查和定性访谈。这是在一项随机实验研究后6个月的随访研究,该研究评估了不同音乐类型对疼痛耐受性的影响。在最初的实验结束时,参与者收到了关于在痛苦的情况下听音乐的建议。背景:荷兰鹿特丹。参与者:调查涉及169名参与者(平均年龄30.6岁,SD 9.8;61.9%的女性),她们参加了最初的试验。在此之后,进行了20次深度访谈。结果测量:对疼痛管理的音乐感知进行了调查,揭示了定量调查数据的总体趋势。以数据为主导的定性访谈主题分析侧重于个人看法。结果:参与者表现出高度的用音乐来缓解疼痛的意愿,特别是对于所谓的情感痛苦(如焦虑、压力和心碎)。个人的态度因不同的情况、音乐类型和疼痛类型而有所不同。讨论了诸如不考虑选择和医疗保健背景下的社会敏感性等障碍。建议医疗保健专业人员采取积极主动的方法和医疗保健接受者的自主权来克服这些障碍。有趣的是,“错误”的音乐类型或“错误”的情况被认为是无益的,甚至是有害的。结论:意识到个人需求和潜在的负面影响对于使用音乐来缓解疼痛至关重要。需要一种主动和个性化的方法来有效地在医疗保健中实施音乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Multidomain evaluation and data-driven approaches to predict recurrent neck pain (END-RNP): a study protocol for a multicentre prospective longitudinal cohort study. Incidence and prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease: insights from a retrospective cohort study using a UK nationwide health database. Promoting engagement in patient-initiated follow-up and self-care behaviours: acceptability of the 'ACT now & check-it-out' intervention for head and neck cancer (PETNECK2 study). Prognostic factors for pain intensity and function in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for muscle health in community-dwelling older adults at high risk of sarcopenia: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1