Racial and ethnic disparities in children and adults in the usage of continuous glucose monitors: a scoping review protocol.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092883
Forest Melton, Linda Jepkoech Kimaru, D Jean McClelland, Peter D Reaven, Kelly N B Palmer
{"title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in children and adults in the usage of continuous glucose monitors: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Forest Melton, Linda Jepkoech Kimaru, D Jean McClelland, Peter D Reaven, Kelly N B Palmer","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This scoping review synthesises the existing literature on racial and ethnic disparities in the utilisation of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) among adults and children with diabetes in the USA. The primary objective is to describe the extent and nature of these disparities, with the broader goal of informing future research and interventions to address health inequities.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework, this review will systematically search PubMed, Embase and Scopus for relevant studies. Included studies will focus on individuals diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in the USA. Selection criteria will prioritise studies reporting demographic factors, CGM usage patterns and associated health outcomes. The primary outcome is the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in CGM utilisation. Data synthesis will use the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Framework (NIMHD) to uncover patterns of CGM utilisation among racial-ethnic groups. The NIMHD facilitates a multilevel examination of the factors influencing CGM initiation, continued use and attrition by integrating individual, interpersonal, community and societal level influences. This comprehensive approach provides a nuanced understanding of the barriers and facilitators shaping CGM usage across diverse populations. By applying the NIMHD framework, this review aims to identify existing disparities, uncover gaps in the literature and offer direction for future research and interventions.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>As this study involves a review of previously published literature and does not involve human subjects research, institutional review board approval will not be pursued. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries. LITERATURE REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGW6M.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 3","pages":"e092883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This scoping review synthesises the existing literature on racial and ethnic disparities in the utilisation of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) among adults and children with diabetes in the USA. The primary objective is to describe the extent and nature of these disparities, with the broader goal of informing future research and interventions to address health inequities.

Methods and analysis: Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework, this review will systematically search PubMed, Embase and Scopus for relevant studies. Included studies will focus on individuals diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in the USA. Selection criteria will prioritise studies reporting demographic factors, CGM usage patterns and associated health outcomes. The primary outcome is the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in CGM utilisation. Data synthesis will use the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Framework (NIMHD) to uncover patterns of CGM utilisation among racial-ethnic groups. The NIMHD facilitates a multilevel examination of the factors influencing CGM initiation, continued use and attrition by integrating individual, interpersonal, community and societal level influences. This comprehensive approach provides a nuanced understanding of the barriers and facilitators shaping CGM usage across diverse populations. By applying the NIMHD framework, this review aims to identify existing disparities, uncover gaps in the literature and offer direction for future research and interventions.

Ethics and dissemination: As this study involves a review of previously published literature and does not involve human subjects research, institutional review board approval will not be pursued. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries. LITERATURE REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGW6M.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和成人使用连续血糖监测仪的种族和民族差异:范围审查方案。
引言:本综述综合了美国成人和儿童糖尿病患者使用连续血糖监测仪(cgm)的种族和民族差异的现有文献。主要目标是描述这些差异的程度和性质,更广泛的目标是为未来的研究和干预措施提供信息,以解决卫生不平等问题。方法与分析:以Joanna Briggs研究所的方法学框架为指导,系统检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行相关研究。纳入的研究将集中在美国诊断为1型或2型糖尿病的个体。选择标准将优先考虑报告人口因素、CGM使用模式和相关健康结果的研究。主要结果是CGM使用中种族和民族差异的程度。数据综合将使用国家少数民族健康和健康差异框架研究所(NIMHD)来揭示种族-民族群体使用CGM的模式。NIMHD通过整合个人、人际、社区和社会层面的影响,促进了对影响CGM启动、持续使用和消耗的因素的多层次检查。这种全面的方法提供了对在不同人群中形成CGM使用的障碍和促进因素的细致理解。通过应用NIMHD框架,本文旨在识别现有的差异,揭示文献中的空白,并为未来的研究和干预提供方向。伦理和传播:由于本研究涉及对先前发表的文献的审查,不涉及人体受试者研究,因此不寻求机构审查委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物、会议报告和概要传播。文献综述注册号:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGW6M。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
ACHTSAM study protocol: outreach diagnostics and assessment of tolerability in severe ME/CFS-a pilot study. Associations between age, gender and health deterioration in caregivers aged 75 and older in Spain: an observational study. A multicentre, prospective, observational study on detecting medication discrepancies using medication reconciliation as a tool at the emergency department among geriatric patients in northwest Ethiopia. Promoting active outdoor play and healthy dietary behaviours through the co-creation of supporting physical and social environments for and with primary school-aged children living in underserved neighbourhoods in Europe: the protocol of the B-Challenged project. Cognitive-behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1