Trichoscopic Features of Lichen Planopilaris versus Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology practical & conceptual Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.5826/dpc.1501a4481
Shreya K Gowda, Enzo Errichetti, Biswanath Behera, Vishal Thakur, Sonika Garg, Deepak Kumar Sahu, Madhusmita Sethy, Pavithra Ayyanar
{"title":"Trichoscopic Features of Lichen Planopilaris versus Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Shreya K Gowda, Enzo Errichetti, Biswanath Behera, Vishal Thakur, Sonika Garg, Deepak Kumar Sahu, Madhusmita Sethy, Pavithra Ayyanar","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1501a4481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) are primary scarring alopecias that few authors consider the same entity, and some consider them different. Only a few reviews focus on trichoscopic findings in delineating these two alopecias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe and summarize the trichoscopic features of both conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an extensive literature search using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The Chi-square test was applied to compare the trichoscopic features in LPP and FFA. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 60 articles, 33 (16 LPP, 17 FFA) were considered for quantitative analysis due to availability in English literature with full text. We found that peripilar cylindrical casts and perifollicular erythema with arborizing vessels were predominant features suggesting early LPP. In contrast, yellow dots, perifollicular erythema, and scattered pigmentation suggested active FFA. Shiny-white area was seen in both groups in the inactive stages. The target arrangement of blue-grey dots, milky-red areas, and irregularly arranged white fibrotic dots were seen in late LPP, and black dots, lonely hairs, and loss of vellus hairs were detected in the later stages of FFA. Features such as blue-grey structureless areas, blue-white veil, and variability in morphologies of hair shafts were not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article provides a comprehensive literature review on the trichoscopic features of LPP and FFA, including comparing the similarities, differences, and peculiarities of both conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1501a4481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) are primary scarring alopecias that few authors consider the same entity, and some consider them different. Only a few reviews focus on trichoscopic findings in delineating these two alopecias.

Objective: We describe and summarize the trichoscopic features of both conditions.

Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The Chi-square test was applied to compare the trichoscopic features in LPP and FFA. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Out of 60 articles, 33 (16 LPP, 17 FFA) were considered for quantitative analysis due to availability in English literature with full text. We found that peripilar cylindrical casts and perifollicular erythema with arborizing vessels were predominant features suggesting early LPP. In contrast, yellow dots, perifollicular erythema, and scattered pigmentation suggested active FFA. Shiny-white area was seen in both groups in the inactive stages. The target arrangement of blue-grey dots, milky-red areas, and irregularly arranged white fibrotic dots were seen in late LPP, and black dots, lonely hairs, and loss of vellus hairs were detected in the later stages of FFA. Features such as blue-grey structureless areas, blue-white veil, and variability in morphologies of hair shafts were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: This article provides a comprehensive literature review on the trichoscopic features of LPP and FFA, including comparing the similarities, differences, and peculiarities of both conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扁平苔藓与额部纤维性脱发的tricscopy特征:系统综述。
扁平苔藓(LPP)和额部纤维化性脱发(FFA)是原发性瘢痕性脱发,很少有作者认为它们是同一实体,有些作者认为它们不同。只有少数的评论集中在毛镜的发现在划定这两种脱发。目的:我们描述和总结这两种情况的三毛镜特征。方法:我们使用PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库进行了广泛的文献检索。采用卡方检验比较LPP和FFA的trichoscopic feature。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在60篇文章中,有33篇(16篇LPP, 17篇FFA)被考虑进行定量分析,因为有英文文献的全文。我们发现柱周型铸型和伴树突性血管的滤泡周围红斑是早期LPP的主要特征。相反,黄点、毛囊周围红斑和分散的色素沉着提示FFA活跃。两组在非活跃期均可见亮白色区。LPP晚期可见蓝灰点、乳红色区、不规则排列的白色纤维化点的靶排列,FFA晚期可见黑点、孤毛、绒毛脱落。在两组之间,诸如蓝灰色无结构区、蓝白色面纱和毛干形态变异等特征没有显著差异。结论:本文对LPP和FFA的三分镜特征进行了全面的文献综述,包括比较两种情况的异同和特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
期刊最新文献
Betamethasone-Calcipotriol Foam: A Promising Treatment for Erythema Annulare Centrifugum With LC-OCT Monitoring. Training Primary Care Practitioners In Dermoscopy Diagnostic Algorithms Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy and Triage of Suspected Skin Cancer: Scoping Review Evidence. Bywaters Lesions: Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Histopathological Insights. Treatment Failure in Scabies: Assessment of Risk Factors in a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Treatment Strategies for Atopic Dermatitis in Adults Who Exhibit Non-Allergic Comorbidities: Real-Life Data from a Tertiary Greek Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1