Review of the anaesthetic management of patients with post-polio syndrome

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.017
Olivia Henry , Patricia Mack , Hannah Wunsch
{"title":"Review of the anaesthetic management of patients with post-polio syndrome","authors":"Olivia Henry ,&nbsp;Patricia Mack ,&nbsp;Hannah Wunsch","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Post-polio syndrome (PPS) is a condition affecting individuals who have previously contracted and recovered from poliomyelitis. It is estimated that up to 20 million people worldwide are still living with the sequelae of polio, and 20–85% of these people may develop PPS. PPS, a diagnosis of exclusion, includes symptoms of new-onset muscle weakness, fatigue, pain, and muscular atrophy that occurs at least 15 yr after an acute polio infection. These patients may present for surgery with or without a formal diagnosis of PPS, requiring anaesthesia clinicians to understand the specific considerations for patients with, or at risk of, PPS. This review addresses specific anaesthetic concerns in PPS care, assessing current research to guide management and highlighting significant evidence gaps. The topics reviewed include the pathophysiology and characteristics of PPS with potential anaesthetic implications, and relevant outcomes data for patients with PPS undergoing anaesthesia. Key areas of concern in the PPS literature included respiratory function, dysphagia, cold intolerance, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents. Existing studies on patients with PPS receiving anaesthesia were primarily case reports, with a lack of large-scale, controlled studies. Areas of continued controversy include ambiguity regarding tolerance to opioids, the use of neuraxial anaesthesia, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative evaluation should include careful assessment of respiratory and swallowing function, with advanced planning for intraoperative and postoperative management using a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is needed to understand anaesthetic risks and develop evidence-based guidelines for this unique patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 5","pages":"Pages 1385-1391"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091225001370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-polio syndrome (PPS) is a condition affecting individuals who have previously contracted and recovered from poliomyelitis. It is estimated that up to 20 million people worldwide are still living with the sequelae of polio, and 20–85% of these people may develop PPS. PPS, a diagnosis of exclusion, includes symptoms of new-onset muscle weakness, fatigue, pain, and muscular atrophy that occurs at least 15 yr after an acute polio infection. These patients may present for surgery with or without a formal diagnosis of PPS, requiring anaesthesia clinicians to understand the specific considerations for patients with, or at risk of, PPS. This review addresses specific anaesthetic concerns in PPS care, assessing current research to guide management and highlighting significant evidence gaps. The topics reviewed include the pathophysiology and characteristics of PPS with potential anaesthetic implications, and relevant outcomes data for patients with PPS undergoing anaesthesia. Key areas of concern in the PPS literature included respiratory function, dysphagia, cold intolerance, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents. Existing studies on patients with PPS receiving anaesthesia were primarily case reports, with a lack of large-scale, controlled studies. Areas of continued controversy include ambiguity regarding tolerance to opioids, the use of neuraxial anaesthesia, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative evaluation should include careful assessment of respiratory and swallowing function, with advanced planning for intraoperative and postoperative management using a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is needed to understand anaesthetic risks and develop evidence-based guidelines for this unique patient population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓灰质炎后综合征患者的麻醉治疗综述。
脊髓灰质炎后综合症(PPS)是一种影响以前感染过脊髓灰质炎并从脊髓灰质炎中康复的个人的病症。据估计,全世界仍有多达2000万人患有脊髓灰质炎的后遗症,其中20-85%的人可能发展为小儿麻痹症。PPS是一种排除性诊断,包括急性脊髓灰质炎感染后至少15年出现的新发肌肉无力、疲劳、疼痛和肌肉萎缩症状。这些患者可能有或没有PPS的正式诊断,要求麻醉临床医生了解PPS患者或有PPS风险的患者的具体考虑因素。本文综述了PPS护理中具体的麻醉问题,评估了当前的研究以指导管理,并强调了重大的证据差距。本文综述的主题包括PPS的病理生理学和潜在麻醉意义的特征,以及PPS患者接受麻醉的相关结果数据。PPS文献中关注的关键领域包括呼吸功能、吞咽困难、冷不耐受和对麻醉剂的敏感性。现有的关于PPS患者接受麻醉的研究主要是病例报告,缺乏大规模的对照研究。持续存在争议的领域包括对阿片类药物的耐受性、神经轴向麻醉的使用以及对麻醉剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂的敏感性。术前评估应包括仔细评估呼吸和吞咽功能,并采用多学科方法对术中和术后管理进行预先规划。需要进一步的研究来了解麻醉的风险,并为这一独特的患者群体制定循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Duration of analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus block with intravenous dexamethasone with or without dexmedetomidine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blind trial The Video Classification of Intubation (VCI) score for videolaryngoscopy: a multicentre international feasibility study Dysfunctional resting state network connectivity predicts postoperative delirium after major surgery Hospital variation in ‘days alive and out of hospital’ after colorectal cancer surgery: a national retrospective cohort study IMpact of PerioperAtive KeTamine on Enhanced Recovery After abdominal Surgery (IMPAKT ERAS). Response to Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1671–72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1