Clinical effects of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics on germ clearance rate and adverse reactions in respiratory infectious diseases: A meta-analysis.
{"title":"Clinical effects of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics on germ clearance rate and adverse reactions in respiratory infectious diseases: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Chunyu Li, Jia Chen, Lujia Chen","doi":"10.5414/CP204722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics on germ clearance rate and adverse reactions in respiratory infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics is an innovative local drug delivery strategy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science were searched systematically for appropriate clinical studies on atomizing inhalation of antibiotics for respiratory infectious diseases (patients diagnosed with respiratory infectious diseases; intervention: atomizing inhalation of antibiotics; comparison: oral or intravenous administration). Basic data recorded: sample size, follow-up time, germ clearance rate, adverse reactions and other outcome indicators. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six independent studies involving 245 patients with respiratory infectious diseases were included. There were 131 patients in the experimental group using atomizing inhalation of antibiotics and 114 patients in the control group utilizing oral or intravenous administration. Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics significantly increased the germ clearance rate (defined by no organism growth in culture and no visible organisms), and reduced number, frequency, and severity of adverse reactions compared with the controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The advantages of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics may be attributed to the direct working of drugs on the infection site, increasing local drug concentrations, and thus killing germs more effectively. However, there are differences in the types and doses of antibiotics, atomizing units, and underlying diseases of patients across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics exerts significantly better germ clearance effects while decreasing the incidence of adverse reactions than does oral or intravenous administration in the treatment of respiratory infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effects of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics on germ clearance rate and adverse reactions in respiratory infectious diseases.
Background: Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics is an innovative local drug delivery strategy.
Material and methods: PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science were searched systematically for appropriate clinical studies on atomizing inhalation of antibiotics for respiratory infectious diseases (patients diagnosed with respiratory infectious diseases; intervention: atomizing inhalation of antibiotics; comparison: oral or intravenous administration). Basic data recorded: sample size, follow-up time, germ clearance rate, adverse reactions and other outcome indicators. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results: Six independent studies involving 245 patients with respiratory infectious diseases were included. There were 131 patients in the experimental group using atomizing inhalation of antibiotics and 114 patients in the control group utilizing oral or intravenous administration. Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics significantly increased the germ clearance rate (defined by no organism growth in culture and no visible organisms), and reduced number, frequency, and severity of adverse reactions compared with the controls.
Discussion: The advantages of atomizing inhalation of antibiotics may be attributed to the direct working of drugs on the infection site, increasing local drug concentrations, and thus killing germs more effectively. However, there are differences in the types and doses of antibiotics, atomizing units, and underlying diseases of patients across studies.
Conclusion: Atomizing inhalation of antibiotics exerts significantly better germ clearance effects while decreasing the incidence of adverse reactions than does oral or intravenous administration in the treatment of respiratory infectious diseases.
目的:探讨雾化吸入抗生素对呼吸道感染性疾病患者细菌清除率及不良反应的影响。背景:抗生素雾化吸入是一种创新的局部给药策略。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed、Medline和Web of Science,寻找适合呼吸道传染病(诊断为呼吸道传染病的患者;干预措施:雾化吸入抗生素;比较:口服或静脉给药)。记录基本资料:样本量、随访时间、细菌清除率、不良反应等结局指标。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析。结果:纳入6项独立研究,涉及245例呼吸道传染病患者。试验组采用雾化吸入抗生素131例,对照组采用口服或静脉给药114例。与对照组相比,雾化吸入抗生素显著提高了细菌清除率(由培养物中无生物生长和无可见生物定义),减少了不良反应的次数、频率和严重程度。讨论:雾化吸入抗生素的优点可能是由于药物直接作用于感染部位,增加局部药物浓度,从而更有效地杀死细菌。然而,在不同的研究中,抗生素的类型和剂量、雾化单位和患者的潜在疾病都存在差异。结论:雾化吸入抗生素治疗呼吸道感染性疾病的细菌清除效果明显优于口服或静脉给药,同时降低了不良反应的发生率。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.