M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo
{"title":"Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.
Methods: A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.
Results: We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).
The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology.
The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.