Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1111/jdv.20649
M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo
{"title":"Passive versus active educational interventions for nevus and melanoma classification: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"M Spadafora, R Pampena, K Peris, L Del Regno, L Cornacchia, M C Fargnoli, C Pellegrini, P Quaglino, S Ribero, P G Calzavara-Pinton, M C Arisi, M Mirra, M Raucci, A Fusco, S Kaleci, J Chester, G Pellacani, C Longo","doi":"10.1111/jdv.20649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17351,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Patients or family members first notice around 50% of primary melanoma lesions. Targeted educational campaigns for non-medical individuals improve melanoma detection rates, but the most effective initiatives are unclear.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of passive versus active intervention for non-medical individuals in classifying nevi and melanomas.

Methods: A multicentric randomized controlled study randomly assigned subjects to receive active intervention (a dermatologist explaining basic rules for melanoma detection) or passive intervention (subject independently reading the basic rules). Subjects were asked to classify 60 clinical photos of nevi and melanomas as 'at risk' of malignancy and nominated the rule(s) they applied at 3 time points-before (T0), immediately following (T1), and 30 ± 2 days after (T2) the educational intervention.

Results: We randomized 364 patients. We included in the analysis 336 subjects (female 61.3%, 156 in the passive and 180 in the active intervention group) with a mean age of 44.5 years. Overall, detection rates of lesions 'at risk' improved from 71.2% (T0) to 86.4% (T1). At T2, detection rates were significantly higher after active intervention (83.7% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.017). Although an overall improvement was described after both interventions, rates of correct responses according to lesion-specific features were significantly higher in the active intervention group for lesions that met ugly duckling (UD) rule criteria at T1 and both rules (ABCDE and UD rules) criteria at T2. Correct (full or partial) rule applications were observed in 80% at T1 (40.2% and 38.4%, respectively) and at T2 (40.4% and 37.8%, respectively), with significantly higher correct rule application in the active group at T1 (p = 0.001) and T2 (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Active educational intervention is more effective than passive education in improving nevi and melanomas classification and correct rule application in non-medical individuals, with stable performance observed over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
874
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV) is a publication that focuses on dermatology and venereology. It covers various topics within these fields, including both clinical and basic science subjects. The journal publishes articles in different formats, such as editorials, review articles, practice articles, original papers, short reports, letters to the editor, features, and announcements from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). The journal covers a wide range of keywords, including allergy, cancer, clinical medicine, cytokines, dermatology, drug reactions, hair disease, laser therapy, nail disease, oncology, skin cancer, skin disease, therapeutics, tumors, virus infections, and venereology. The JEADV is indexed and abstracted by various databases and resources, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Embase, Global Health, InfoTrac, Ingenta Select, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, and others.
期刊最新文献
Response to Reply to: EuroGuiderm guideline on lichen sclerosus-Treatment of lichen sclerosus. Efficacy and safety of etrasimod in alopecia areata: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study. A decade of gliptin-induced bullous pemphigoid. Segmental corymbiform congenital melanocytic naevi: Implications for melanocytic embryology. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1