Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in differentiation between recurrent intracranial tumor and treatment-induced changes.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s00234-025-03575-4
Jussi Hellström, Ishita Huq, Petra Witt Nyström, Erik Blomquist, Sylwia Libard, Raili Raininko, Johan Wikström
{"title":"Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in differentiation between recurrent intracranial tumor and treatment-induced changes.","authors":"Jussi Hellström, Ishita Huq, Petra Witt Nyström, Erik Blomquist, Sylwia Libard, Raili Raininko, Johan Wikström","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03575-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging to dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI in differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment-induced changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our prospective study included patients previously treated with radiotherapy for intracranial tumors who later developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion. The final diagnosis was based on neuropathology or 6-month follow-up. MR examinations were performed for calculation of the perfusion fraction (f) using the IVIM technique and relative blood volume (rCBV) using DSC perfusion. Measurements of f and rCBV were made by two independent readers in hotspots when possible, but otherwise in the whole enhancing region. Measures of rCBV were normalized to the contralateral region. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients (35 men, median age 49, range 20-77) were evaluated. Forty-four patients had tumor recurrence and 16 had treatment-induced changes. Mean f was 0.090 for tumors and 0.058 for treatment-induced changes (p = 0.002). Mean rCBV was 3.52 and 1.79, respectively (p = 0.002). The area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis was 0.72 for f and 0.77 for rCBV. Cutoff values of 0.073 for f and 2.26 for rCBV yielded equal values for sensitivity (73%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (73%). The 90th percentile value of rCBV was 4.77 for tumors and 2.53 for treatment-induced changes (p = 0.0004) and yielded the highest AUC (0.79) and a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 80%/75%/78% at cutoff value 3.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The accuracy of the IVIM parameter f is similar to that of rCBV in differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment-induced changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1423-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03575-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging to dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI in differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment-induced changes.

Methods: Our prospective study included patients previously treated with radiotherapy for intracranial tumors who later developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion. The final diagnosis was based on neuropathology or 6-month follow-up. MR examinations were performed for calculation of the perfusion fraction (f) using the IVIM technique and relative blood volume (rCBV) using DSC perfusion. Measurements of f and rCBV were made by two independent readers in hotspots when possible, but otherwise in the whole enhancing region. Measures of rCBV were normalized to the contralateral region. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed.

Results: Sixty patients (35 men, median age 49, range 20-77) were evaluated. Forty-four patients had tumor recurrence and 16 had treatment-induced changes. Mean f was 0.090 for tumors and 0.058 for treatment-induced changes (p = 0.002). Mean rCBV was 3.52 and 1.79, respectively (p = 0.002). The area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis was 0.72 for f and 0.77 for rCBV. Cutoff values of 0.073 for f and 2.26 for rCBV yielded equal values for sensitivity (73%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (73%). The 90th percentile value of rCBV was 4.77 for tumors and 2.53 for treatment-induced changes (p = 0.0004) and yielded the highest AUC (0.79) and a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 80%/75%/78% at cutoff value 3.25.

Conclusion: The accuracy of the IVIM parameter f is similar to that of rCBV in differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment-induced changes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体内非相干运动成像和动态感知对比灌注磁共振成像在区分颅内复发性肿瘤和治疗引起的病变方面的应用。
目的:比较体素内非相干运动(IVIM)成像与动态敏感性加权对比(DSC)灌注MRI在鉴别肿瘤复发与治疗性改变方面的价值。方法:我们的前瞻性研究纳入了先前接受放疗的颅内肿瘤患者,这些患者后来出现了新的或增强的对比增强病变。最终诊断是基于神经病理学或6个月的随访。mri检查采用IVIM技术计算灌注分数(f),采用DSC灌注计算相对血容量(rCBV)。f和rCBV的测量在可能的情况下由两个独立的读取器在热点进行,否则在整个增强区域进行。rCBV测量归一化到对侧区域。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。结果:60例患者(男性35例,中位年龄49岁,范围20-77岁)接受了评估。44例出现肿瘤复发,16例出现治疗性改变。肿瘤的平均f值为0.090,治疗引起的变化的平均f值为0.058 (p = 0.002)。平均rCBV分别为3.52和1.79 (p = 0.002)。ROC分析中f和rCBV的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.72和0.77。f的截止值为0.073,rCBV的截止值为2.26,其敏感性(73%)、特异性(75%)和准确性(73%)均相等。肿瘤的rCBV第90百分位值为4.77,治疗性改变的rCBV第90百分位值为2.53 (p = 0.0004),其AUC最高(0.79),截止值为3.25时的敏感性/特异性/准确性分别为80%/75%/78%。结论:IVIM参数f与rCBV鉴别肿瘤复发与治疗性改变的准确性相近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
"Bright Tongue" and "Wine Glass" signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clinical impact of transcranial unilateral motor evoked potentials monitoring in cerebral aneurysm endovascular treatment. Preoperative evaluation of internal carotid artery invasion in glomus jugulare tumors: applicability of contrast-enhanced 3D brain volume imaging. European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR). Four-dimensional carotid blood flow laterality (4D-CBL) scale using four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of severity of internal carotid artery stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1