Neonatal mortality and contraceptive utilization following abortion restriction in the Dominican Republic: A difference-in-differences analysis

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117969
Foluso Ishola , Britt McKinnon , Seungmi Yang , Arijit Nandi
{"title":"Neonatal mortality and contraceptive utilization following abortion restriction in the Dominican Republic: A difference-in-differences analysis","authors":"Foluso Ishola ,&nbsp;Britt McKinnon ,&nbsp;Seungmi Yang ,&nbsp;Arijit Nandi","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2009, the Dominican Republic's Constitutional Assembly banned abortion under all circumstances, including cases of rape and/or situations in which the mother's health is at risk. Abortion policies have the potential to influence access to reproductive and neonatal health services, health outcomes, and health equity. In this study, we utilized a difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the association between the 2009 abortion reform in the Dominican Republic and neonatal mortality and modern contraceptive utilization. We harmonized data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) between 1999 and 2019 to assemble a panel of 792,165 live births across 17 countries for analyses of neonatal mortality and 417,110 women ages 15–49 across 8 countries for analyses of modern contraceptive use. We compared outcome trajectories in the Dominican Republic to a group of control countries that did not change their abortion policies during the study period and are assumed to represent the counterfactual. Fixed effects for country and year were included to control for unobserved time-invariant confounders that varied across countries and temporal trends that were shared across countries, respectively. We also assessed for heterogeneity by household wealth, rural residency, and educational attainment through a stratified analysis. Over the study period, the rate of neonatal mortality was 27.0 per 1,000 live births and there were 39 per 100 women reporting use of modern contraceptives. Abortion restriction was associated with an additional 6.3 (95 % CI = 2.1, 10.5) neonatal deaths per 1,000 live births and a 9.6 (95 % CI = 4.2, 15.0) percentage-point decrease in modern contraceptive use. Estimates were robust to adjustment for individual, household, and country-level characteristics. However, there is possibility of residual confounding by unmeasured time-varying confounders, such as concomitant policy changes or interventions. Further research into how restrictive abortion policies compound racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 117969"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2009, the Dominican Republic's Constitutional Assembly banned abortion under all circumstances, including cases of rape and/or situations in which the mother's health is at risk. Abortion policies have the potential to influence access to reproductive and neonatal health services, health outcomes, and health equity. In this study, we utilized a difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the association between the 2009 abortion reform in the Dominican Republic and neonatal mortality and modern contraceptive utilization. We harmonized data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) between 1999 and 2019 to assemble a panel of 792,165 live births across 17 countries for analyses of neonatal mortality and 417,110 women ages 15–49 across 8 countries for analyses of modern contraceptive use. We compared outcome trajectories in the Dominican Republic to a group of control countries that did not change their abortion policies during the study period and are assumed to represent the counterfactual. Fixed effects for country and year were included to control for unobserved time-invariant confounders that varied across countries and temporal trends that were shared across countries, respectively. We also assessed for heterogeneity by household wealth, rural residency, and educational attainment through a stratified analysis. Over the study period, the rate of neonatal mortality was 27.0 per 1,000 live births and there were 39 per 100 women reporting use of modern contraceptives. Abortion restriction was associated with an additional 6.3 (95 % CI = 2.1, 10.5) neonatal deaths per 1,000 live births and a 9.6 (95 % CI = 4.2, 15.0) percentage-point decrease in modern contraceptive use. Estimates were robust to adjustment for individual, household, and country-level characteristics. However, there is possibility of residual confounding by unmeasured time-varying confounders, such as concomitant policy changes or interventions. Further research into how restrictive abortion policies compound racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多米尼加共和国堕胎限制后的新生儿死亡率和避孕药具使用率:差异中的差异分析。
2009年,多米尼加共和国制宪议会禁止在任何情况下堕胎,包括强奸和/或母亲健康受到威胁的情况。堕胎政策有可能影响获得生殖和新生儿健康服务、健康结果和健康公平。在这项研究中,我们利用差异中的差异方法来评估多米尼加共和国2009年堕胎改革与新生儿死亡率和现代避孕药具使用之间的关系。我们统一了1999年至2019年期间人口与健康调查(DHS)和多指标类集调查(MICS)的数据,对17个国家的792,165名活产婴儿进行了新生儿死亡率分析,并对8个国家的417,110名15-49岁妇女进行了现代避孕药具使用分析。我们将多米尼加共和国的结果轨迹与一组在研究期间没有改变其堕胎政策的控制国家进行了比较,并假设这些国家代表了反事实。包括国家和年份的固定效应,以控制各国不同的未观察到的时不变混杂因素和各国共有的时间趋势。我们还通过分层分析评估了家庭财富、农村居住和教育程度的异质性。在研究期间,新生儿死亡率为每1 000例活产27.0例,每100名妇女中有39名报告使用现代避孕药具。堕胎限制与每1,000例活产新生儿额外6.3例(95% CI = 2.1, 10.5)例死亡以及现代避孕药具使用率降低9.6个百分点(95% CI = 4.2, 15.0)相关。对个人、家庭和国家层面的特征进行调整的估计是稳健的。然而,由于未测量的时变混杂因素,如伴随的政策变化或干预措施,存在残留混杂的可能性。需要进一步研究限制性堕胎政策是如何加剧种族、民族和社会经济不平等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1