Implications of Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Completion of Cardiac Stress Tests.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2024.240067R1
Maelys J Amat, Anthony Zhong, Cancan Zhang, Ernest Gervino, Rishi Wadhera, Russell S Phillips
{"title":"Implications of Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Completion of Cardiac Stress Tests.","authors":"Maelys J Amat, Anthony Zhong, Cancan Zhang, Ernest Gervino, Rishi Wadhera, Russell S Phillips","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240067R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though cardiac stress tests have long been the standard of care for initial evaluation of cardiac symptoms, our institution, along with others, has noted high rates of incomplete tests.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify sociodemographic factors associated with the completion of cardiac stress tests and to assess the value of completed tests.</p><p><strong>Design & participants: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review evaluating 150 patients with cardiac stress tests orders placed in 1 urban hospital-based primary care practice from 1/1/2018-12/31/2021.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Our primary outcome was the completion of the stress test. We examined rates of completion based on sociodemographic factors including age, gender, race, language, and social vulnerability, markers of chronic illness, risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and pretest probability of coronary artery disease.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>In a multivariable adjusted model, female gender (OR:0.43 [0.18-1.00]), Black race (OR:0.26 [0.11-0.61]), and dyslipidemia (OR:0.27 [0.090-0.78]) were associated with lower test completion rates. We found no relationship between the likelihood of test completion and pretest probability. In an analysis of tests with low pretest probability, 100% of low-risk stress tests were negative; had any of those tests been positive the highest positive predictive value would have been 25%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Test completion rates were significantly lower for individuals with female gender, Black race, and a diagnosis of dyslipidemia, highlighting inequities in the completion rates for a potentially lifesaving test. In addition, a substantial number of ordered tests were low risk and low value, highlighting areas of opportunity by advancing the value of cardiovascular care delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 6","pages":"1088-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240067R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Though cardiac stress tests have long been the standard of care for initial evaluation of cardiac symptoms, our institution, along with others, has noted high rates of incomplete tests.

Objective: To identify sociodemographic factors associated with the completion of cardiac stress tests and to assess the value of completed tests.

Design & participants: We conducted a retrospective chart review evaluating 150 patients with cardiac stress tests orders placed in 1 urban hospital-based primary care practice from 1/1/2018-12/31/2021.

Main measures: Our primary outcome was the completion of the stress test. We examined rates of completion based on sociodemographic factors including age, gender, race, language, and social vulnerability, markers of chronic illness, risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and pretest probability of coronary artery disease.

Key results: In a multivariable adjusted model, female gender (OR:0.43 [0.18-1.00]), Black race (OR:0.26 [0.11-0.61]), and dyslipidemia (OR:0.27 [0.090-0.78]) were associated with lower test completion rates. We found no relationship between the likelihood of test completion and pretest probability. In an analysis of tests with low pretest probability, 100% of low-risk stress tests were negative; had any of those tests been positive the highest positive predictive value would have been 25%.

Conclusions: Test completion rates were significantly lower for individuals with female gender, Black race, and a diagnosis of dyslipidemia, highlighting inequities in the completion rates for a potentially lifesaving test. In addition, a substantial number of ordered tests were low risk and low value, highlighting areas of opportunity by advancing the value of cardiovascular care delivered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1