A systematic literature review on municipal solid waste management using machine learning and deep learning

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s10462-025-11196-9
Ishaan Dawar, Anisha Srivastava, Maanas Singal, Nirjara Dhyani, Suvi Rastogi
{"title":"A systematic literature review on municipal solid waste management using machine learning and deep learning","authors":"Ishaan Dawar,&nbsp;Anisha Srivastava,&nbsp;Maanas Singal,&nbsp;Nirjara Dhyani,&nbsp;Suvi Rastogi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11196-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Population growth and urbanization have led to a significant increase in solid waste. However, conventional methods of treating and recycling this waste have inherent problems, such as low efficiency, poor precision, high cost, and severe environmental hazards. To address these challenges, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained popularity in recent years as a potential solution for municipal solid-waste management (MSWM). A few applications of AI, based on Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, have been used for MSWM. This study reviews the current landscape in MSWM, highlighting the existing advantages and disadvantages of 69 studies published between 2018 and 2024 using the PRISMA methodology. The applications of ML and DL algorithms demonstrate their ability to enhance decision-making processes, improve resource recovery rates, and promote circular economy principles. Although these technologies offer promising solutions, challenges such as data availability, quality, and interdisciplinary collaboration hinder their effective implementation. The paper suggests future research directions focusing on developing robust datasets, fostering partnerships across sectors, and integrating advanced technologies with traditional waste management strategies. This research aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly Goal 11, which aims to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. In the future, this research can contribute to making cities smarter, greener, and more resilient using ML and DL techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11196-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11196-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population growth and urbanization have led to a significant increase in solid waste. However, conventional methods of treating and recycling this waste have inherent problems, such as low efficiency, poor precision, high cost, and severe environmental hazards. To address these challenges, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained popularity in recent years as a potential solution for municipal solid-waste management (MSWM). A few applications of AI, based on Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, have been used for MSWM. This study reviews the current landscape in MSWM, highlighting the existing advantages and disadvantages of 69 studies published between 2018 and 2024 using the PRISMA methodology. The applications of ML and DL algorithms demonstrate their ability to enhance decision-making processes, improve resource recovery rates, and promote circular economy principles. Although these technologies offer promising solutions, challenges such as data availability, quality, and interdisciplinary collaboration hinder their effective implementation. The paper suggests future research directions focusing on developing robust datasets, fostering partnerships across sectors, and integrating advanced technologies with traditional waste management strategies. This research aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly Goal 11, which aims to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. In the future, this research can contribute to making cities smarter, greener, and more resilient using ML and DL techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习和深度学习对城市固体废物管理进行了系统的文献综述
人口增长和城市化导致固体废物显著增加。然而,传统的处理和回收方法存在效率低、精度差、成本高、环境危害严重等问题。为了应对这些挑战,人工智能(AI)近年来作为城市固体废物管理(MSWM)的潜在解决方案而受到欢迎。基于机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术的人工智能的一些应用已经用于MSWM。本研究回顾了MSWM的现状,强调了2018年至2024年间使用PRISMA方法发表的69项研究的现有优势和劣势。ML和DL算法的应用证明了它们增强决策过程、提高资源回收率和促进循环经济原则的能力。尽管这些技术提供了有希望的解决方案,但数据可用性、质量和跨学科协作等挑战阻碍了它们的有效实施。本文提出了未来的研究方向,重点是建立健全的数据集,促进跨部门的伙伴关系,以及将先进技术与传统废物管理战略相结合。这项研究符合联合国可持续发展目标(SDG),特别是目标11,该目标旨在使城市具有包容性、安全性、弹性和可持续性。在未来,这项研究可以通过机器学习和深度学习技术使城市更智能、更环保、更有弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Recent trends of machine learning techniques for risk assessment in hazardous environments Semantic and temporal-aware hybrid embedding for transformer-based sequential recommendation Geospatial reasoning and awareness in large language models: a systematic review Glider snake optimizer (GSO): a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global and engineering optimization problems Quality over quantity: a data-centric survey of annotation errors in object detection datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1