Fatty infiltration predicts retear and functional impairment following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05702-6
Hao-Tian Wu, Qiang Liu, Jian-Hao Lin
{"title":"Fatty infiltration predicts retear and functional impairment following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hao-Tian Wu, Qiang Liu, Jian-Hao Lin","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05702-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fatty infiltration (FI) in rotator cuff (RC) is detected in many patients with complete RC tears. But there remains controversy on the prognostic effects of FI in RC tears, especially for patients with moderate and severe FI. This study aims to systematically review the relationship between the severity of preoperative FI and risk of retear, and the association between preoperative FI and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies on association between preoperative FI and retear or functional outcomes following complete RC repair. FI was assessed using Goutallier classification and global fatty degeneration index (GFDI). Meta-analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) for retear among patients with mild (grade 0-1), moderate (grade 2) and severe (grade 3-4) FI in RC tears. We delivered qualitative synthesis on association between FI and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies with 1997 patients were included in the systematic review and ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with GFDI ≤ 1 had lower retear odds (OR = 0.08, 95%CI 0.02-0.29, p < 0.01). Moderate FI in supraspinatus muscle (SSP) was associated with higher retear odds compared with mild FI (OR = 1.95, 95%CI 1.09-3.48, p = 0.02) and severe FI was associated with more retear compared with moderate FI (OR = 3.37, 95%CI 1.08-10.53, p = 0.04). Similar effects were observed in FI in infraspinatus muscle (ISP) (moderate vs. mild: OR = 2.22, 95%CI 1.07-4.62, p = 0.03; severe vs. moderate: OR = 2.06, 95%CI 1.02-4.16, p = 0.04). The severity of FI in subscapularis muscle and teres minor muscle was not observed to be associated with the retear rates. In functional outcomes, lower grade of FI in GFDI was associated with better prognosis. FI in single muscles failed to present prognostic effects on functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The severity of FI in SSP and ISP showed effects on retear following complete RC repair. The GFDI was a compatible predictor for risk of anatomic and functional impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05702-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fatty infiltration (FI) in rotator cuff (RC) is detected in many patients with complete RC tears. But there remains controversy on the prognostic effects of FI in RC tears, especially for patients with moderate and severe FI. This study aims to systematically review the relationship between the severity of preoperative FI and risk of retear, and the association between preoperative FI and functional outcomes.

Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies on association between preoperative FI and retear or functional outcomes following complete RC repair. FI was assessed using Goutallier classification and global fatty degeneration index (GFDI). Meta-analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (ORs) for retear among patients with mild (grade 0-1), moderate (grade 2) and severe (grade 3-4) FI in RC tears. We delivered qualitative synthesis on association between FI and functional outcomes.

Results: Eighteen studies with 1997 patients were included in the systematic review and ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with GFDI ≤ 1 had lower retear odds (OR = 0.08, 95%CI 0.02-0.29, p < 0.01). Moderate FI in supraspinatus muscle (SSP) was associated with higher retear odds compared with mild FI (OR = 1.95, 95%CI 1.09-3.48, p = 0.02) and severe FI was associated with more retear compared with moderate FI (OR = 3.37, 95%CI 1.08-10.53, p = 0.04). Similar effects were observed in FI in infraspinatus muscle (ISP) (moderate vs. mild: OR = 2.22, 95%CI 1.07-4.62, p = 0.03; severe vs. moderate: OR = 2.06, 95%CI 1.02-4.16, p = 0.04). The severity of FI in subscapularis muscle and teres minor muscle was not observed to be associated with the retear rates. In functional outcomes, lower grade of FI in GFDI was associated with better prognosis. FI in single muscles failed to present prognostic effects on functional outcomes.

Conclusions: The severity of FI in SSP and ISP showed effects on retear following complete RC repair. The GFDI was a compatible predictor for risk of anatomic and functional impairment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂肪浸润预测肩袖修复后的再撕裂和功能损害:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:在许多完全性肩袖撕裂的患者中可以检测到肩袖脂肪浸润(FI)。但FI对RC撕裂的预后影响,特别是对中重度FI患者的预后影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在系统回顾术前FI严重程度与再发风险之间的关系,以及术前FI与功能结局之间的关系。材料和方法:我们检索了PubMed, Embase和Web of Science,以研究术前FI与完全RC修复后的恢复或功能结果之间的关系。采用Goutallier分类和全球脂肪变性指数(GFDI)评估FI。进行荟萃分析以确定RC撕裂中轻度(0-1级)、中度(2级)和重度(3-4级)FI患者的再撕率(ORs)。我们对FI和功能结果之间的关系进行了定性综合。结果:18项研究纳入了1997例患者,10项研究纳入了meta分析。GFDI≤1的患者恢复率较低(OR = 0.08, 95%CI 0.02 ~ 0.29, p)。结论:SSP和ISP的FI严重程度对RC完全修复后的恢复有影响。GFDI是解剖和功能损害风险的相容预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Clinical anatomy of distal femur and its implications in total knee arthroplasty: a radiological study. Prognostic impact of preoperative MRI on core decompression in ARCO stage III osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective cohort study. All-inside endoscopic and minimally invasive modified Bunnell suture yield favourable outcomes in acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures: a comparative study. Determinants of mortality following intertrochanteric fractures, comorbidities versus reduction quality: retrospective cohort study. The best solution is the simplest: advances in surgical and minimally invasive management of aneurysmal and simple bone cysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1