Off-label use of drugs in pregnancy: A critical review of guidelines, current practices, and a clinical perspective.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.70076
Vitalba Gallitelli, Rita Franco, Sofia Guidi, Simona Zaami, Marco Parasiliti, Annalisa Vidiri, Federica Perelli, Francesco Plotti, Georgios Eleftheriou, Alberto Mattei, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Franca Cavaliere
{"title":"Off-label use of drugs in pregnancy: A critical review of guidelines, current practices, and a clinical perspective.","authors":"Vitalba Gallitelli, Rita Franco, Sofia Guidi, Simona Zaami, Marco Parasiliti, Annalisa Vidiri, Federica Perelli, Francesco Plotti, Georgios Eleftheriou, Alberto Mattei, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Franca Cavaliere","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this narrative review was twofold: to delineate the usage patterns of the main off-label drugs during pregnancy (i.e., misoprostol, nifedipine, and corticosteroids) and to offer a medical examiner's perspective on the use of these medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive review of the literature was performed to assess the off-label use of corticosteroids, nifedipine, and misoprostol in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 503 records about the use of off-label medicines during pregnancy were identified. After the exclusion of papers published in languages other than English and experimental studies in animals, 340 studies were considered eligible. Studies with medicines other than corticosteroids, misoprostol, and nifedipine were removed, leaving a total of 240 articles. From the remaining records, 24 reports were not retrieved. The research strategy allowed the final identification of 76 references.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Off-label drug use in obstetrics has transitioned from being an exception to a routine, scientifically validated practice. While its application is justified by clinical outcomes and international protocols, healthcare providers must navigate a strict framework of ethical and legal responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this narrative review was twofold: to delineate the usage patterns of the main off-label drugs during pregnancy (i.e., misoprostol, nifedipine, and corticosteroids) and to offer a medical examiner's perspective on the use of these medications.

Methods: An extensive review of the literature was performed to assess the off-label use of corticosteroids, nifedipine, and misoprostol in pregnancy.

Results: Overall, 503 records about the use of off-label medicines during pregnancy were identified. After the exclusion of papers published in languages other than English and experimental studies in animals, 340 studies were considered eligible. Studies with medicines other than corticosteroids, misoprostol, and nifedipine were removed, leaving a total of 240 articles. From the remaining records, 24 reports were not retrieved. The research strategy allowed the final identification of 76 references.

Conclusion: Off-label drug use in obstetrics has transitioned from being an exception to a routine, scientifically validated practice. While its application is justified by clinical outcomes and international protocols, healthcare providers must navigate a strict framework of ethical and legal responsibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Cervical ripening with Foley catheter balloon: A prospective cohort of 320 women. Investigation of endoplasmic reticulum stress parameters in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective study. Perceived feasibility of a multicomponent prenatal intervention on childhood vaccinations: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of prenatal care providers, April-June 2022. Appropriateness of the delivery room and healthcare Professionals' communication and health care services during delivery in the Gaza strip: Women's perspective. Combined storage and intraoperative autologous blood transfusion with thrombosis prevention for secondary polycythemia induced by a giant broad ligament leiomyoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1