Effect of neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education exercises for persistent hamstring strain: a case report.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Medical Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1186/s13256-025-05179-1
Praveen Kumar Kandakurti, Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Watson Arulsingh, Animesh Hazari
{"title":"Effect of neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education exercises for persistent hamstring strain: a case report.","authors":"Praveen Kumar Kandakurti, Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Watson Arulsingh, Animesh Hazari","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05179-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite appropriate interventions, healing following hamstring strain tends to be slow. Prediction for return to play is inconsistent, and recurrence of injuries is high, which poses a challenge and burden to athletes, sports physiotherapists, and trainers. The exact mechanism of hamstring strain injury or re-injury still remains unclear. The primary focus of this case report was to discuss a patient's course of treatment with relentless symptoms of hamstring strain and how he responded to neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 20-year-old male Arabic martial artist had a history of left hamstring strain for the past 5 weeks. He had undergone pharmacological and physiotherapeutic interventions for his clinical conditions but had not responded favorably. Further clinical assessment had ruled out hamstring syndrome. The patient refrained from all sports activities.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The patient was treated using a modified slump mobilization technique with four repetitions for 3 consecutive days, together with postural retraining. Results of the numeric pain rating scale and Knee Society score before and after the interventions were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Pre-intervention score of the numeric pain rating scale was 5/10 and 7/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Assessment on the 3rd consecutive day of intervention, the numeric pain rating scale decreased to 2/10 and 4/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Similarly, the pre- and post-intervention Knee Society score improved from 22 to 61 in pain and from 30 to 80 in function. At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported a complete recovery from symptoms and resumed his sports activities without any disruption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuromeningel mobilization and postural re-education exercises are suggested as mainstream of treatment for hamstring strains, even when the slump test is negative. This report calls for a need of advancement in diagnostic procedure dealing with all hamstring strain injury conditions. More prospective studies are recommended to confirm the current findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05179-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite appropriate interventions, healing following hamstring strain tends to be slow. Prediction for return to play is inconsistent, and recurrence of injuries is high, which poses a challenge and burden to athletes, sports physiotherapists, and trainers. The exact mechanism of hamstring strain injury or re-injury still remains unclear. The primary focus of this case report was to discuss a patient's course of treatment with relentless symptoms of hamstring strain and how he responded to neuromeningeal mobilization and postural re-education.

Case description: A 20-year-old male Arabic martial artist had a history of left hamstring strain for the past 5 weeks. He had undergone pharmacological and physiotherapeutic interventions for his clinical conditions but had not responded favorably. Further clinical assessment had ruled out hamstring syndrome. The patient refrained from all sports activities.

Intervention: The patient was treated using a modified slump mobilization technique with four repetitions for 3 consecutive days, together with postural retraining. Results of the numeric pain rating scale and Knee Society score before and after the interventions were obtained.

Results and discussion: Pre-intervention score of the numeric pain rating scale was 5/10 and 7/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Assessment on the 3rd consecutive day of intervention, the numeric pain rating scale decreased to 2/10 and 4/10 at rest and with activity, respectively. Similarly, the pre- and post-intervention Knee Society score improved from 22 to 61 in pain and from 30 to 80 in function. At the 2-month follow-up, the patient reported a complete recovery from symptoms and resumed his sports activities without any disruption.

Conclusion: Neuromeningel mobilization and postural re-education exercises are suggested as mainstream of treatment for hamstring strains, even when the slump test is negative. This report calls for a need of advancement in diagnostic procedure dealing with all hamstring strain injury conditions. More prospective studies are recommended to confirm the current findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经脑膜动员和体位再教育练习对持续性腘绳肌劳损的效果:1例报告。
导言:尽管采取了适当的干预措施,但腿筋拉伤后的愈合速度往往很慢。对恢复比赛的预测并不一致,而且损伤复发率很高,这给运动员、运动理疗师和教练员带来了挑战和负担。腿筋拉伤或再次受伤的确切机制仍不清楚。本病例报告的主要重点是讨论一位腿筋拉伤症状反复发作的患者的治疗过程,以及他对神经脑膜动员和姿势再教育的反应:一名 20 岁的男性阿拉伯武术运动员在过去 5 周内一直有左腿筋拉伤的病史。他曾接受过药物和物理治疗干预,但效果不佳。进一步的临床评估排除了腿筋综合征的可能性。患者拒绝参加任何体育活动:患者接受了改良的坍塌移动技术治疗,连续 3 天重复 4 次,同时进行姿势再训练。结果和讨论:结果与讨论:干预前的数字疼痛评分量表在休息和活动时的评分分别为 5/10 和 7/10。在连续 3 天的干预评估中,休息时和活动时的数字疼痛评分量表分别降至 2/10 和 4/10。同样,干预前后的膝关节协会评分在疼痛方面从 22 分提高到 61 分,在功能方面从 30 分提高到 80 分。在 2 个月的随访中,患者表示症状完全恢复,并顺利恢复了体育活动:结论:建议将神经活动和姿势再教育练习作为腿筋拉伤的主流治疗方法,即使坍塌试验呈阴性。本报告呼吁,在处理所有腘绳肌拉伤情况时,需要改进诊断程序。建议开展更多前瞻性研究,以证实当前的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
期刊最新文献
Amyloidosis with predominant gastrointestinal symptoms: a challenge for physicians and a burden for patients: a case report. Familial complex regional pain syndrome in pediatric siblings: a diagnostic challenge and therapeutic success-a case report. Alagille syndrome caused by p.L2014Vfs*10 in NOTCH2: a case report and review of the literature. Critical uterine bleeding after miscarriage in a warfarin-anticoagulated patient with mechanical heart valve: a case report. Letter to the Editor regarding "Cranial neuropathy during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: a case report".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1