{"title":"Assessing student satisfaction with university policies related to in-person classes in the era of COVID-19: a case study from Korea.","authors":"Sungyo Jung, Yoojin Cho, Jinhyun Kwon, Yeram Yang, Jaewon Lee, Sungkyoon Kim","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92360-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed key determinants of student satisfaction with university infection prevention policies during the expansion of in-person classes amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Conducted at a South Korean university, the research surveyed 386 undergraduate and graduate students, examining the impact of health literacy, protective behavior, risk perception, institutional support, and engagement with COVID-19 information on satisfaction. Findings indicate that among online-only students, vaccination status significantly influenced satisfaction levels, suggesting that perceived safety plays a key role in mitigating pandemic-related concerns. For students attending in-person classes, frequent engagement with COVID-19 notifications and willingness to use a university-provided COVID-19 information database were strongly associated with higher satisfaction. Additionally, the study reveals a passive approach to information acquisition, highlighting students' preference for institution-driven communication rather than independent information-seeking. These results underscore the importance of clear, structured institutional communication and proactive support systems in enhancing student satisfaction and well-being. The findings provide actionable recommendations for universities to develop strategic communication policies, expand institutional support, and improve student engagement, particularly in collectivist cultures where institutional guidance is central to decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92360-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed key determinants of student satisfaction with university infection prevention policies during the expansion of in-person classes amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Conducted at a South Korean university, the research surveyed 386 undergraduate and graduate students, examining the impact of health literacy, protective behavior, risk perception, institutional support, and engagement with COVID-19 information on satisfaction. Findings indicate that among online-only students, vaccination status significantly influenced satisfaction levels, suggesting that perceived safety plays a key role in mitigating pandemic-related concerns. For students attending in-person classes, frequent engagement with COVID-19 notifications and willingness to use a university-provided COVID-19 information database were strongly associated with higher satisfaction. Additionally, the study reveals a passive approach to information acquisition, highlighting students' preference for institution-driven communication rather than independent information-seeking. These results underscore the importance of clear, structured institutional communication and proactive support systems in enhancing student satisfaction and well-being. The findings provide actionable recommendations for universities to develop strategic communication policies, expand institutional support, and improve student engagement, particularly in collectivist cultures where institutional guidance is central to decision-making.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.