Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for pressure injuries among patients requiring with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit.

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-92848-2
Li Zheng, Yu-Juan Xue, Zhen-Nan Yuan, Xue-Zhong Xing
{"title":"Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for pressure injuries among patients requiring with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit.","authors":"Li Zheng, Yu-Juan Xue, Zhen-Nan Yuan, Xue-Zhong Xing","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92848-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>pressure injuries are significant concern for ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Early prediction is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. This study aims to develop a predictive model using machine learning techniques, specifically XGBoost combined with SHAP, to identify key risk factors of pressure ulcers in this population. Utilizing the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, we included a cohort of 29,448 mechanically ventilated patients in ICU intensive unit. These patients were divided into a training set (20,614 patients, 70%) and an internal validation set (8,834 patients, 30%). Of these, 2,052 patients developed pressure injuries. We applied the XGBoost algorithm to build the predictive model and used SHAP analysis to identify the top ten factors influencing pressure ulcer development: 'sepsis', 'age', 'the count of platelet', 'length of ICU stay', 'PaO2/FiO2 ratio', 'hemoglobin concentration', 'admission type', 'renal disease', 'albumin concentration', and 'ethnicity'. The predictive model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.797 (95% CI: 0.786-0.808) in the training set and 0.739 (95% CI: 0.721-0.758) in the validation set. Calibration curves demonstrated good fit, and the decision curve analysis indicated clinical utility. This study successfully developed a machine learning model that accurately predicts the risk of pressure ulcers in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. This model could serve as a useful tool for guiding early interventions, ultimately reducing the incidence of pressure injuries in this vulnerable population. The integration of SHAP analysis offers insights into the most critical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92848-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

pressure injuries are significant concern for ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Early prediction is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. This study aims to develop a predictive model using machine learning techniques, specifically XGBoost combined with SHAP, to identify key risk factors of pressure ulcers in this population. Utilizing the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, we included a cohort of 29,448 mechanically ventilated patients in ICU intensive unit. These patients were divided into a training set (20,614 patients, 70%) and an internal validation set (8,834 patients, 30%). Of these, 2,052 patients developed pressure injuries. We applied the XGBoost algorithm to build the predictive model and used SHAP analysis to identify the top ten factors influencing pressure ulcer development: 'sepsis', 'age', 'the count of platelet', 'length of ICU stay', 'PaO2/FiO2 ratio', 'hemoglobin concentration', 'admission type', 'renal disease', 'albumin concentration', and 'ethnicity'. The predictive model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.797 (95% CI: 0.786-0.808) in the training set and 0.739 (95% CI: 0.721-0.758) in the validation set. Calibration curves demonstrated good fit, and the decision curve analysis indicated clinical utility. This study successfully developed a machine learning model that accurately predicts the risk of pressure ulcers in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. This model could serve as a useful tool for guiding early interventions, ultimately reducing the incidence of pressure injuries in this vulnerable population. The integration of SHAP analysis offers insights into the most critical factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压力损伤是接受机械通气的重症监护病房病人的重大问题。早期预测对于提高患者预后和降低医疗成本至关重要。本研究旨在利用机器学习技术(特别是 XGBoost 结合 SHAP)开发一个预测模型,以确定该人群中压疮的关键风险因素。利用 MIMIC-IV 2.2 数据库,我们纳入了 29448 名 ICU 重症监护室机械通气患者。这些患者被分为训练集(20614 名患者,占 70%)和内部验证集(8834 名患者,占 30%)。其中,2052 名患者出现了压力损伤。我们应用 XGBoost 算法建立了预测模型,并使用 SHAP 分析确定了影响压疮发生的十大因素:"败血症"、"年龄"、"血小板计数"、"重症监护室住院时间"、"PaO2/FiO2 比值"、"血红蛋白浓度"、"入院类型"、"肾病"、"白蛋白浓度 "和 "种族"。预测模型在训练集中的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.797(95% CI:0.786-0.808),在验证集中的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.739(95% CI:0.721-0.758)。校准曲线显示了良好的拟合度,决策曲线分析表明了其临床实用性。本研究成功开发了一种机器学习模型,可准确预测使用机械通气的重症监护病房患者的压疮风险。该模型可作为指导早期干预的有用工具,最终降低这一弱势群体的压伤发生率。结合 SHAP 分析可深入了解最关键的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Leukocytes.
IF 3.2 3区 医学Current Opinion in HematologyPub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI: 10.1097/00062752-199704010-00001
Leukocytes.
IF 3.2 3区 医学Current Opinion in HematologyPub Date : 1995-01-01 DOI:
Leukocytes.
IF 3.2 3区 医学Current Opinion in HematologyPub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI:
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of curcumin nano-niosomes for glioma-targeted therapy. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of rural cultural ecosystem services: a case study of Fujian, China. Mechanical constitutive model of stand off damping composites layered rubber core under wide strain rates. Distinct effects of two dominant enteric bacteria on the developmental performance of spodoptera frugiperda and their association with physiological metabolism. Efficacy of hemostasis and gingival retraction of Merocel strip compared with conventional retraction cord utilizing digital gypsum model: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1