Study on the learning curve for thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02800-4
Kexin Cao, Kun Li, Geng Zhang, Zhijun Chen, Jian Zhu
{"title":"Study on the learning curve for thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer.","authors":"Kexin Cao, Kun Li, Geng Zhang, Zhijun Chen, Jian Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02800-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The procedure for thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer is complicated, so the operation time is long, which can easily negatively affect the self-confidence of young thoracic surgeons. This retrospective cohort study aimed to improve young thoracic surgeons' understanding of this type of surgery by analyzing the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2017 to August 2018, 64 patients who underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer by a single team were reviewed by a retrospective cohort study. These patients were divided into four groups according to the date of operation. The baseline data, operation time, the amount of bleeding during the operation, and the number of lymph nodes sampled were compared. Then, the quality of the different stages of the operation was analyzed and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the general baseline data, chest tube duration, or number of samples collected from the right laryngeal nodes among the four groups (p > 0.05). With the accumulation of experience, several key measures of surgical benefit were significantly different among the four groups. Specifically, the operation time became shorter, the amount of bleeding gradually decreased, the number of lymph nodes sampled gradually increased, and the number of left para-recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes sampled gradually increased (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the learning curve, approximately 16 patients needed to complete this type of operation in 300 min, and 22 patients needed to be independently sampled from more than 20 lymph nodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02800-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The procedure for thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer is complicated, so the operation time is long, which can easily negatively affect the self-confidence of young thoracic surgeons. This retrospective cohort study aimed to improve young thoracic surgeons' understanding of this type of surgery by analyzing the learning curve.

Methods: From October 2017 to August 2018, 64 patients who underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer by a single team were reviewed by a retrospective cohort study. These patients were divided into four groups according to the date of operation. The baseline data, operation time, the amount of bleeding during the operation, and the number of lymph nodes sampled were compared. Then, the quality of the different stages of the operation was analyzed and evaluated.

Results: There were no significant differences in the general baseline data, chest tube duration, or number of samples collected from the right laryngeal nodes among the four groups (p > 0.05). With the accumulation of experience, several key measures of surgical benefit were significantly different among the four groups. Specifically, the operation time became shorter, the amount of bleeding gradually decreased, the number of lymph nodes sampled gradually increased, and the number of left para-recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes sampled gradually increased (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: According to the learning curve, approximately 16 patients needed to complete this type of operation in 300 min, and 22 patients needed to be independently sampled from more than 20 lymph nodes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管癌根治术学习曲线研究。
背景:胸腔镜下食管癌根治术操作复杂,手术时间长,容易对年轻胸外科医生的自信心产生负面影响。本回顾性队列研究旨在通过分析学习曲线来提高年轻胸外科医生对这类手术的理解。方法:对2017年10月至2018年8月,同一团队行胸腔镜下食管癌根治术的64例患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据手术日期将患者分为四组。比较基线资料、手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结取样数。然后对手术各阶段的质量进行了分析和评价。结果:四组患者一般基线资料、胸管时间、右喉结标本采集次数均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。随着经验的积累,四组在手术获益的几个关键指标上存在显著差异。其中,手术时间缩短,出血量逐渐减少,淋巴结采样数量逐渐增加,左侧喉返旁神经淋巴结采样数量逐渐增加(p结论:根据学习曲线,约有16例患者需要在300分钟内完成该类型手术,其中22例患者需要在20多个淋巴结中独立采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of late recurrences after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center cohort study. Clinical study on arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation for malunion and nonunion talus fractures classified as type II by Zwipp. Efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheet plus oral steroid on the esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score matched retrospective study. Do pelvic dimensions predict recurrence in inguinal hernia? A matched case-control analysis. The surgical planes and anatomic landmarks in endoscopic thyroidectomy-a clinical anatomic research of 83 cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1