On the relation between single word and multiple word processing during learning to read

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106223
Brice Brossette , Élise Lefèvre , Jonathan Grainger , Bernard Lété
{"title":"On the relation between single word and multiple word processing during learning to read","authors":"Brice Brossette ,&nbsp;Élise Lefèvre ,&nbsp;Jonathan Grainger ,&nbsp;Bernard Lété","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study investigated the development of single word processing and multiple word processing skills in French-speaking children from Grade 2 to Grade 6. A total of 150 children participated in two tasks: a Lexical Decision Task (LDT) and a Grammatical Decision Task (GDT). The LDT was used to test single word processing abilities, whereas the GDT was used to test multiple word processing abilities, with stimuli presented at varying display times (LDT: 83–300 ms; GDT: 150–700 ms). Signal detection theory analysis revealed that all children performed well in the LDT, whereas only Grade 4 and Grade 6 children performed above chance in the GDT. A cluster analysis was used to investigate the different types of relation between sensitivity (<em>d’</em>) in the LDT and GDT. The analysis revealed two clusters that differed in reading fluency and sensitivity in both tasks. Children from Cluster 2, who exhibited the highest sensitivity in the LDT, were the only ones to perform on average above the chance level in the GDT. Moreover, a strong correlation (<em>r</em> = .64) between LDT and GDT performance was found in this group. Finally, we found that a sensitivity of 1.95 in the LDT almost perfectly predicted cluster membership. Such sensitivity was achieved at Grade 3, suggesting that the ability to process multiple word sequences first requires sufficient efficiency in processing words in isolation. Once this turning point is reached, single word processing skills support the development of multiple word processing, which could take several years to mature fully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 106223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096525000293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated the development of single word processing and multiple word processing skills in French-speaking children from Grade 2 to Grade 6. A total of 150 children participated in two tasks: a Lexical Decision Task (LDT) and a Grammatical Decision Task (GDT). The LDT was used to test single word processing abilities, whereas the GDT was used to test multiple word processing abilities, with stimuli presented at varying display times (LDT: 83–300 ms; GDT: 150–700 ms). Signal detection theory analysis revealed that all children performed well in the LDT, whereas only Grade 4 and Grade 6 children performed above chance in the GDT. A cluster analysis was used to investigate the different types of relation between sensitivity (d’) in the LDT and GDT. The analysis revealed two clusters that differed in reading fluency and sensitivity in both tasks. Children from Cluster 2, who exhibited the highest sensitivity in the LDT, were the only ones to perform on average above the chance level in the GDT. Moreover, a strong correlation (r = .64) between LDT and GDT performance was found in this group. Finally, we found that a sensitivity of 1.95 in the LDT almost perfectly predicted cluster membership. Such sensitivity was achieved at Grade 3, suggesting that the ability to process multiple word sequences first requires sufficient efficiency in processing words in isolation. Once this turning point is reached, single word processing skills support the development of multiple word processing, which could take several years to mature fully.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读学习中单字与多字处理的关系
本研究调查了法语二年级至六年级儿童单字处理和多字处理技能的发展情况。共有150名儿童参与了两个任务:词汇决策任务(LDT)和语法决策任务(GDT)。LDT用于测试单个单词处理能力,而GDT用于测试多个单词处理能力,并在不同的显示时间(LDT: 83-300 ms;GDT: 150-700 ms)。信号检测理论分析显示,所有儿童在LDT中表现良好,而只有四年级和六年级儿童在GDT中表现高于机会。采用聚类分析来研究LDT和GDT中灵敏度(d ')之间的不同类型的关系。分析显示,在两个任务中,两个集群在阅读流畅性和敏感性方面存在差异。第2类儿童在LDT中表现出最高的敏感性,是唯一在GDT中平均表现高于机会水平的儿童。此外,在该组中,LDT和GDT表现之间存在很强的相关性(r = .64)。最后,我们发现LDT的灵敏度为1.95,几乎可以完美地预测集群成员。这种敏感性在3年级时达到,这表明处理多个单词序列的能力首先需要在单独处理单词时具有足够的效率。一旦达到这个转折点,单字处理技能就可以支持多字处理的发展,这可能需要几年的时间才能完全成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children. Children's motivational beliefs in math, verbal, and spatial domains: Relations to gender, grade level, and achievement. The development of essentialist beliefs about social status categories in China. Do picture books affect counting directionality in preliterate children? Developmental course and potential mechanisms. Bidirectional associations between self-regulation, social-emotional skills and mathematics in preschoolers: the interplay with teacher-child relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1