A comparative evaluation of 222Rn sealing materials for 226Ra analysis by gamma spectrometry

IF 2.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of environmental radioactivity Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107673
Han Chang Seo, Hyeon-Woo Lee, Kyeong Ho Kim, Jeongsoo Kang, Jung-Seok Chae
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of 222Rn sealing materials for 226Ra analysis by gamma spectrometry","authors":"Han Chang Seo,&nbsp;Hyeon-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Kyeong Ho Kim,&nbsp;Jeongsoo Kang,&nbsp;Jung-Seok Chae","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accuracy of indirect measurements of <sup>226</sup>Ra using gamma spectrometry critically depends on sealing techniques that prevent the escape of <sup>222</sup>Rn (radon) generated within the sample. This study introduces a novel sealing method designed to overcome the limitations of conventional Rn sealing techniques. The Rn sealing performance of five sealing materials—silicone sealant, modified silicone sealant, butyl sealant, polyurethane sealant, and epoxy adhesive—was evaluated by sealing sample containers filled with Rn-containing water samples using each of the five materials, measuring Rn over time, and comparing experimentally estimated half-life of Rn for each sealed container with its physical half-life. Among the five sealing materials evaluated, the experimentally estimated half-life of Rn in samples sealed with modified silicone sealant, butyl sealant, polyurethane sealant, and epoxy adhesive, excluding silicone sealant, closely matched the physical half-life of Rn, demonstrating their reliable sealing performance. To verify the validity of the sealing method, the activity concentration of <sup>226</sup>Ra was estimated in IAEA-434 phosphogypsum, a certified reference material, sealed with five different sealing materials. The results showed that for the four sealing materials, excluding silicone sealant, the measured values were statistically consistent with the certified value of IAEA-434, confirming the validity of the sealing method using these materials. The proposed sealing method enables accurate analytical results without requiring the complete filling of the measurement container, allows for visual inspection of the sample's filling state, and facilitates sample reuse for further analyses. These advantages make it a practical approach for the routine analysis of NORM and environmental samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 107673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X25000608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accuracy of indirect measurements of 226Ra using gamma spectrometry critically depends on sealing techniques that prevent the escape of 222Rn (radon) generated within the sample. This study introduces a novel sealing method designed to overcome the limitations of conventional Rn sealing techniques. The Rn sealing performance of five sealing materials—silicone sealant, modified silicone sealant, butyl sealant, polyurethane sealant, and epoxy adhesive—was evaluated by sealing sample containers filled with Rn-containing water samples using each of the five materials, measuring Rn over time, and comparing experimentally estimated half-life of Rn for each sealed container with its physical half-life. Among the five sealing materials evaluated, the experimentally estimated half-life of Rn in samples sealed with modified silicone sealant, butyl sealant, polyurethane sealant, and epoxy adhesive, excluding silicone sealant, closely matched the physical half-life of Rn, demonstrating their reliable sealing performance. To verify the validity of the sealing method, the activity concentration of 226Ra was estimated in IAEA-434 phosphogypsum, a certified reference material, sealed with five different sealing materials. The results showed that for the four sealing materials, excluding silicone sealant, the measured values were statistically consistent with the certified value of IAEA-434, confirming the validity of the sealing method using these materials. The proposed sealing method enables accurate analytical results without requiring the complete filling of the measurement container, allows for visual inspection of the sample's filling state, and facilitates sample reuse for further analyses. These advantages make it a practical approach for the routine analysis of NORM and environmental samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伽玛能谱法分析222Rn密封材料的比较评价
使用伽马能谱法间接测量222ra的准确性在很大程度上取决于防止样品中产生的222Rn(氡)逸出的密封技术。本研究介绍了一种新的密封方法,旨在克服传统Rn密封技术的局限性。五种密封材料(硅酮密封胶、改性硅酮密封胶、丁基密封胶、聚氨酯密封胶和环氧胶粘剂)的Rn密封性能通过使用每种材料密封装满含Rn水样的样品容器,测量随时间变化的Rn,并将每个密封容器中实验估计的Rn半衰期与其物理半衰期进行比较来评估。在评估的5种密封材料中,除硅酮密封胶外,改性硅酮密封胶、丁基密封胶、聚氨酯密封胶和环氧胶粘剂密封的样品中,实验估计的Rn半衰期与Rn的物理半衰期非常接近,表明它们的密封性能可靠。为了验证密封方法的有效性,用5种不同的密封材料对认证标准物质IAEA-434磷石膏进行了226Ra活性浓度的估算。结果表明,除有机硅密封胶外,四种密封材料的测量值与IAEA-434认证值在统计学上一致,证实了使用这些材料的密封方法的有效性。所提出的密封方法能够在不需要完全填充测量容器的情况下获得准确的分析结果,允许目视检查样品的填充状态,并便于样品重复使用以进行进一步分析。这些优点使其成为NORM和环境样品常规分析的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental radioactivity
Journal of environmental radioactivity 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Radioactivity provides a coherent international forum for publication of original research or review papers on any aspect of the occurrence of radioactivity in natural systems. Relevant subject areas range from applications of environmental radionuclides as mechanistic or timescale tracers of natural processes to assessments of the radioecological or radiological effects of ambient radioactivity. Papers deal with naturally occurring nuclides or with those created and released by man through nuclear weapons manufacture and testing, energy production, fuel-cycle technology, etc. Reports on radioactivity in the oceans, sediments, rivers, lakes, groundwaters, soils, atmosphere and all divisions of the biosphere are welcomed, but these should not simply be of a monitoring nature unless the data are particularly innovative.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of air purifiers’ effectiveness for removing radioactive aerosols indoors Modeling gamma radiation intensity in monazite rich coastal environments using neural network Radiological assessment of petroleum source rocks from the Middle Magdalena Valley basin in Colombia Laboratory investigation of the relationship between soil surface radon exhalation rate and temperature under high-humidity stable conditions Brain and red bone marrow dose coefficients for children and adults chronically exposed to radon as basis for brain tumor and leukemia risk analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1