Creative spark or overthinking? The synergistic effects of free and controlled associations on creativity

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101818
Ling Liu , Xintong Zheng , Qifan Zhang , Tianchen Yang
{"title":"Creative spark or overthinking? The synergistic effects of free and controlled associations on creativity","authors":"Ling Liu ,&nbsp;Xintong Zheng ,&nbsp;Qifan Zhang ,&nbsp;Tianchen Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the dual-process role of associative thinking in creative cognition, focusing on the effects of free and controlled associations on divergent thinking (DT), creative self-concept, openness, and creative behavior. A multi-timepoint design collected data from 384 participants at Time 1 (T1) for free and controlled association tasks and DT, and from 267 participants at Time 2 (T2) for creative self-concept, openness, and creative behavior assessments. Structural equation modeling revealed that both associations positively predicted DT originality and switch distance, but controlled association negatively impacted DT fluency. Regression analyses showed that associative abilities did not directly predict creative behaviors and controlled association negatively impacted creative self-efficacy. Instead, these traits were primarily predicted by the quantity of DT responses. Exploratory analyses revealed that the quantity of DT responses mediated the negative impact of T1 controlled association on T2 creative self-efficacy, self-identity, openness, and behavior. On the other hand, the quality of DT responses mediated the positive effect of controlled association on T2 creative behavior. These findings support the dual-process perspective of associative theory and highlight the greater influence of associative processes in the early stages of creative thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101818"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the dual-process role of associative thinking in creative cognition, focusing on the effects of free and controlled associations on divergent thinking (DT), creative self-concept, openness, and creative behavior. A multi-timepoint design collected data from 384 participants at Time 1 (T1) for free and controlled association tasks and DT, and from 267 participants at Time 2 (T2) for creative self-concept, openness, and creative behavior assessments. Structural equation modeling revealed that both associations positively predicted DT originality and switch distance, but controlled association negatively impacted DT fluency. Regression analyses showed that associative abilities did not directly predict creative behaviors and controlled association negatively impacted creative self-efficacy. Instead, these traits were primarily predicted by the quantity of DT responses. Exploratory analyses revealed that the quantity of DT responses mediated the negative impact of T1 controlled association on T2 creative self-efficacy, self-identity, openness, and behavior. On the other hand, the quality of DT responses mediated the positive effect of controlled association on T2 creative behavior. These findings support the dual-process perspective of associative theory and highlight the greater influence of associative processes in the early stages of creative thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创意火花还是过度思考?自由和受控制的联想对创造力的协同效应
本研究探讨了联想思维在创造性认知中的双过程作用,重点探讨了自由联想和受控联想对发散思维、创造性自我概念、开放性和创造性行为的影响。采用多时间点设计,收集384名参与者在时间1 (T1)进行自由和受控联想任务和DT, 267名参与者在时间2 (T2)进行创造性自我概念、开放性和创造性行为评估。结构方程模型显示,两种关联对DT独创性和转换距离均有正向影响,而控制关联对DT流畅性有负向影响。回归分析表明,联想能力不能直接预测创造性行为,而控制联想对创造性自我效能感有负向影响。相反,这些性状主要是由DT响应的数量来预测的。探索性分析发现,DT反应的数量在T1控制关联对T2创造性自我效能、自我同一性、开放性和行为的负向影响中起中介作用。另一方面,DT反应的质量在控制性联想对T2创造性行为的正向影响中起中介作用。这些发现支持了联想理论的双过程观点,并突出了联想过程在创造性思维早期阶段的更大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Factors and pathways of AIGC tools' associations with university students' creative expression—A hybrid method based on SEM and fsQCA The impact of virtual reality-assisted learning on students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis of 37 experimental and quasi-experimental studies The impact of toolkit-based maker activity model (IPRCV model) on senior high school students' maker literacy and learning experiences: A quasi-experimental study Fostering Critical Thinking Through STEM Undergraduate Research: Mechanisms and Challenges in a Chinese Research University An inquiry method for critical thinking instruction in the Iranian EFL context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1