Using Multilabel Neural Network to Score High-Dimensional Assessments for Different Use Foci: An Example with College Major Preference Assessment

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Educational Measurement Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1111/jedm.12424
Shun-Fu Hu, Amery D. Wu, Jake Stone
{"title":"Using Multilabel Neural Network to Score High-Dimensional Assessments for Different Use Foci: An Example with College Major Preference Assessment","authors":"Shun-Fu Hu,&nbsp;Amery D. Wu,&nbsp;Jake Stone","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scoring high-dimensional assessments (e.g., &gt; 15 traits) can be a challenging task. This paper introduces the multilabel neural network (MNN) as a scoring method for high-dimensional assessments. Additionally, it demonstrates how MNN can score the same test responses to maximize different performance metrics, such as accuracy, recall, or precision, to suit users' varying needs. These two objectives are illustrated with an example of scoring the short version of the College Majors Preference assessment (Short CMPA) to match the results of whether the 50 college majors would be in one's top three, as determined by the Long CMPA. The results reveal that MNN significantly outperforms the simple-sum ranking method (i.e., ranking the 50 majors' subscale scores) in targeting recall (.95 vs. .68) and precision (.53 vs. .38), while gaining an additional 3% in accuracy (.94 vs. .91). These findings suggest that, when executed properly, MNN can be a flexible and practical tool for scoring numerous traits and addressing various use foci.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":"62 1","pages":"120-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scoring high-dimensional assessments (e.g., > 15 traits) can be a challenging task. This paper introduces the multilabel neural network (MNN) as a scoring method for high-dimensional assessments. Additionally, it demonstrates how MNN can score the same test responses to maximize different performance metrics, such as accuracy, recall, or precision, to suit users' varying needs. These two objectives are illustrated with an example of scoring the short version of the College Majors Preference assessment (Short CMPA) to match the results of whether the 50 college majors would be in one's top three, as determined by the Long CMPA. The results reveal that MNN significantly outperforms the simple-sum ranking method (i.e., ranking the 50 majors' subscale scores) in targeting recall (.95 vs. .68) and precision (.53 vs. .38), while gaining an additional 3% in accuracy (.94 vs. .91). These findings suggest that, when executed properly, MNN can be a flexible and practical tool for scoring numerous traits and addressing various use foci.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用多标签神经网络为不同使用重点的高维评估打分:以大学专业偏好评估为例
对高维评估(例如,>;15个特征)可能是一项具有挑战性的任务。本文介绍了多标签神经网络(MNN)作为高维评价的评分方法。此外,它还演示了MNN如何对相同的测试响应进行评分,以最大化不同的性能指标,例如准确性、召回率或精度,以满足用户的不同需求。这两个目标通过一个简短版的大学专业偏好评估(short CMPA)的例子来说明,以匹配50个大学专业是否会进入前三名的结果,由长CMPA决定。结果表明,MNN在目标召回(recall)方面显著优于简单和排序方法(即对50个专业的子量表分数进行排序)。95 vs. 68)和精度(。53 vs. 38),同时获得额外3%的准确性(。94 vs. 91)。这些发现表明,如果执行得当,MNN可以成为一种灵活实用的工具,用于评分许多特征和解决各种使用焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Using GPT-4 to Augment Imbalanced Data for Automatic Scoring Vertical Scaling with Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis A Quantitative Method for Evaluating the Predictive Utility of Linked Scores Identifying Features Contributing to Differential Prediction Bias of Automated Scoring Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1