Does It Matter to the C-Suite? The Role of Top Management in a Purchasing Manager's Responsible Sourcing Intentions

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Business Logistics Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1111/jbl.70012
Satabdi Hazarika, Yanji Duan, Tingting Yan, John A. Aloysius
{"title":"Does It Matter to the C-Suite? The Role of Top Management in a Purchasing Manager's Responsible Sourcing Intentions","authors":"Satabdi Hazarika,&nbsp;Yanji Duan,&nbsp;Tingting Yan,&nbsp;John A. Aloysius","doi":"10.1111/jbl.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Firms face increased scrutiny from both governments and consumers about socially responsible practices. Firms may address social issues in their supply chains by selecting socially responsible suppliers—a decision heavily influenced by the preferences of purchasing managers. Although prior research provides empirical evidence that this decision is affected by different stakeholders, these results are usually at the firm level and do not reveal how a purchasing manager forms their preference toward socially responsible suppliers. This study, using social projection theory and a behavioral experiment with supply chain managers, studies the influence of purchasing managers' perception of top management beliefs (PTMB) on socially responsible sourcing intentions (SRSS). Purchasing managers' internal values (ISI) strongly shape their PTMB, both directly and indirectly influencing purchasing managers' SRSS, while external stakeholder pressures from suppliers and customers (EPSP) impact SRSS indirectly through PTMB. Regulatory pressure (RP), however, shows no effect on PTMB. A post hoc analysis reveals that purchasing managers with high ISI favored sustainable suppliers, even when organizational priorities indicated by top management action (TMA) are not about socially responsible sourcing. Our findings provide a nomological network explaining a manager's responsible sourcing decisions and provide guidance for firms to enhance their responsible sourcing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firms face increased scrutiny from both governments and consumers about socially responsible practices. Firms may address social issues in their supply chains by selecting socially responsible suppliers—a decision heavily influenced by the preferences of purchasing managers. Although prior research provides empirical evidence that this decision is affected by different stakeholders, these results are usually at the firm level and do not reveal how a purchasing manager forms their preference toward socially responsible suppliers. This study, using social projection theory and a behavioral experiment with supply chain managers, studies the influence of purchasing managers' perception of top management beliefs (PTMB) on socially responsible sourcing intentions (SRSS). Purchasing managers' internal values (ISI) strongly shape their PTMB, both directly and indirectly influencing purchasing managers' SRSS, while external stakeholder pressures from suppliers and customers (EPSP) impact SRSS indirectly through PTMB. Regulatory pressure (RP), however, shows no effect on PTMB. A post hoc analysis reveals that purchasing managers with high ISI favored sustainable suppliers, even when organizational priorities indicated by top management action (TMA) are not about socially responsible sourcing. Our findings provide a nomological network explaining a manager's responsible sourcing decisions and provide guidance for firms to enhance their responsible sourcing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这对高管们重要吗?高层管理者在采购经理负责任的采购意向中的作用
企业在社会责任实践方面面临着来自政府和消费者越来越多的审查。企业可以通过选择对社会负责的供应商来解决供应链中的社会问题——这一决定在很大程度上受到采购经理偏好的影响。尽管先前的研究提供了经验证据,表明这一决策受到不同利益相关者的影响,但这些结果通常是在公司层面上的,并没有揭示采购经理如何形成对社会责任供应商的偏好。本研究运用社会投射理论和供应链经理行为实验,研究采购经理对高层管理信念的感知(PTMB)对社会责任采购意向的影响。采购经理的内部价值观(ISI)强烈地塑造了采购经理的SRSS,直接和间接地影响采购经理的SRSS,而来自供应商和客户的外部利益相关者压力(EPSP)通过PTMB间接影响SRSS。然而,调控压力(RP)对PTMB没有影响。一项事后分析显示,ISI高的采购经理青睐可持续供应商,即使最高管理层行动(TMA)表明的组织优先事项与社会责任采购无关。我们的研究结果提供了一个解释管理者负责任采购决策的逻辑网络,并为企业加强负责任采购提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
期刊最新文献
Labor Flows in Supply Chains: A Review of the Literature and Future Research Opportunities Issue Information When Safety Technologies Backfire: How Monitoring Affects Drivers' Safety Behavior How Relationships End: A Review and Research Agenda of Buyer–Supplier Relationship Dissolution Reinvigorating Conversation in Logistics and Supply Chains: A Cross-Disciplinary Theoretical Toolkit for Disruptive Value Creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1