Testing for Acetylcholine Receptor and Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies by Fixed Cell-Based Assay in Clinical Practice: Positive Predictive Value for Myasthenia Gravis

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1111/ene.70123
Cathy Meng Fei Li, Michael W. Nicolle, Kamala Sangam, Liju Yang, Adrian Budhram
{"title":"Testing for Acetylcholine Receptor and Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase Antibodies by Fixed Cell-Based Assay in Clinical Practice: Positive Predictive Value for Myasthenia Gravis","authors":"Cathy Meng Fei Li,&nbsp;Michael W. Nicolle,&nbsp;Kamala Sangam,&nbsp;Liju Yang,&nbsp;Adrian Budhram","doi":"10.1111/ene.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fixed cell-based assays (CBAs) to detect acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-AChR/MuSK) are now available, but evaluations of their diagnostic performance in clinical practice are lacking. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA for myasthenia gravis (MG), following the implementation of this assay as first-line testing at our centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified all patients at our centre with positive anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA results between November 2021 and July 2024. Clinical information was reviewed to classify patients as having true positive or false positive antibody results. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with MG and no more likely alternative diagnosis were classified as true positives, whereas all others were classified as false positives. Test PPV was calculated as the proportion of positives that were classified as true positives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 770 patients who underwent anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA testing, 109 (14%) had positive antibody results (Anti-AChR, 105; Anti-MuSK, 4). Among them, one patient with anti-AChR positivity was classified as a false positive (suspected thymic hyperplasia without neurologic symptoms). The remaining 108 patients were classified as true positives, resulting in a calculated PPV of 99%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA had excellent PPV for MG. Anti-AChR positivity in one asymptomatic patient with suspected thymic hyperplasia was classified as a false positive result, although the possibility that it represents a true marker of thymic pathology in a patient who may later develop MG is challenging to exclude. The high PPV reported herein supports the use of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA as first-line testing for suspected MG.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ene.70123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fixed cell-based assays (CBAs) to detect acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (anti-AChR/MuSK) are now available, but evaluations of their diagnostic performance in clinical practice are lacking. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA for myasthenia gravis (MG), following the implementation of this assay as first-line testing at our centre.

Methods

We identified all patients at our centre with positive anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA results between November 2021 and July 2024. Clinical information was reviewed to classify patients as having true positive or false positive antibody results. Patients with a clinical presentation compatible with MG and no more likely alternative diagnosis were classified as true positives, whereas all others were classified as false positives. Test PPV was calculated as the proportion of positives that were classified as true positives.

Results

Of 770 patients who underwent anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA testing, 109 (14%) had positive antibody results (Anti-AChR, 105; Anti-MuSK, 4). Among them, one patient with anti-AChR positivity was classified as a false positive (suspected thymic hyperplasia without neurologic symptoms). The remaining 108 patients were classified as true positives, resulting in a calculated PPV of 99%.

Conclusions

We found that anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA had excellent PPV for MG. Anti-AChR positivity in one asymptomatic patient with suspected thymic hyperplasia was classified as a false positive result, although the possibility that it represents a true marker of thymic pathology in a patient who may later develop MG is challenging to exclude. The high PPV reported herein supports the use of anti-AChR/MuSK fixed CBA as first-line testing for suspected MG.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床应用固定细胞法检测乙酰胆碱受体和肌肉特异性酪氨酸激酶抗体:对重症肌无力的阳性预测价值
基于固定细胞的检测方法(cba)检测乙酰胆碱受体和肌肉特异性酪氨酸激酶抗体(抗achr /MuSK)现已可用,但缺乏对其在临床实践中的诊断性能的评估。我们检测了抗achr /MuSK固定CBA对重症肌无力(MG)的阳性预测价值(PPV),该检测在我们中心作为一线检测实施后。方法:在2021年11月至2024年7月期间,我们对中心所有抗achr /MuSK固定CBA结果阳性的患者进行筛选。回顾临床资料,将患者分为抗体结果真阳性或假阳性。临床表现与MG相符且没有其他可能诊断的患者被归类为真阳性,而所有其他患者被归类为假阳性。测试PPV以被归类为真阳性的阳性比例计算。结果770例患者接受抗achr /MuSK固定CBA检测,109例(14%)抗体阳性(anti-AChR, 105例;Anti-MuSK, 4)。其中1例抗achr阳性患者为假阳性(疑似胸腺增生,无神经系统症状)。其余108例患者被归类为真阳性,计算PPV为99%。结论抗achr /MuSK固定CBA对MG有良好的PPV效果。在一名疑似胸腺增生的无症状患者中,抗achr阳性被归类为假阳性结果,尽管很难排除它可能代表后来可能发展为MG的患者胸腺病理的真实标志。本文报道的高PPV支持使用抗achr /MuSK固定CBA作为疑似MG的一线检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Safety of Physical Activity After Cervical Artery Dissection. Transmission Ratio Distortion in Genetic Prion Diseases: Clarifying Methodological Considerations. Impact of a Neurogenic Dysphagia Outpatient Clinic on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Nutrition. Clinical Significance of Microembolic Signal Detection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights Into Ongoing Cerebral Embolization and Occult Etiologies. Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Versus Inebilizumab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Dual-Center, Real-World Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1