Plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin in nonpregnant adults

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.046
Steven L. Shafer , Douglas G. Ririe , Scott Miller , Regina S. Curry , David T. Hsu , Gregory M. Sullivan , James C. Eisenach
{"title":"Plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin in nonpregnant adults","authors":"Steven L. Shafer ,&nbsp;Douglas G. Ririe ,&nbsp;Scott Miller ,&nbsp;Regina S. Curry ,&nbsp;David T. Hsu ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;James C. Eisenach","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The development of oxytocin as a therapeutic agent outside of obstetrics has been hampered by antibody-based assays that lack specificity, leading to inconsistent and incompletely reported pharmacokinetic models to guide drug dosing. This study describes the population plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin using a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) assay.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two studies in healthy adult men and nonpregnant women were performed, the first with intravenous oxytocin 16.7 μg over 1 or 10 min and the second with intravenous oxytocin 13.7 μg over 30 min and, on a separate day, intranasal oxytocin 100 μg (<em>n</em>=24). Venous plasma oxytocin concentration was measured using LC/MS and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin were well described by a two-compartment model (0% bias, 18% median inaccuracy). The two-compartment model for intranasal oxytocin was characterised by substantial subject-to-subject variability (9% median bias, 47% median inaccuracy). Nasal oxytocin bioavailability was 0.7%. Oxytocin samples assayed with LC/MS were systematically higher than simultaneous samples assayed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin are well described by a two-compartment model. The low bioavailability (&lt;1%) and large intersubject variability in plasma oxytocin after intranasal dosing could partially explain the inconsistent reports of oxytocin efficacy in the clinical literature with this delivery method. A publicly available simulator was created to guide oxytocin dosing in future studies.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT 03929367 (Study 1) and NCT 05672667 (Study 2).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 5","pages":"Pages 1513-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091225001126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The development of oxytocin as a therapeutic agent outside of obstetrics has been hampered by antibody-based assays that lack specificity, leading to inconsistent and incompletely reported pharmacokinetic models to guide drug dosing. This study describes the population plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intranasal oxytocin using a sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) assay.

Methods

Two studies in healthy adult men and nonpregnant women were performed, the first with intravenous oxytocin 16.7 μg over 1 or 10 min and the second with intravenous oxytocin 13.7 μg over 30 min and, on a separate day, intranasal oxytocin 100 μg (n=24). Venous plasma oxytocin concentration was measured using LC/MS and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM.

Results

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin were well described by a two-compartment model (0% bias, 18% median inaccuracy). The two-compartment model for intranasal oxytocin was characterised by substantial subject-to-subject variability (9% median bias, 47% median inaccuracy). Nasal oxytocin bioavailability was 0.7%. Oxytocin samples assayed with LC/MS were systematically higher than simultaneous samples assayed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxytocin are well described by a two-compartment model. The low bioavailability (<1%) and large intersubject variability in plasma oxytocin after intranasal dosing could partially explain the inconsistent reports of oxytocin efficacy in the clinical literature with this delivery method. A publicly available simulator was created to guide oxytocin dosing in future studies.

Clinical trial registration

NCT 03929367 (Study 1) and NCT 05672667 (Study 2).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未怀孕成人静脉注射和鼻内催产素的血浆药代动力学。
背景:基于抗体的检测缺乏特异性,导致指导给药的药代动力学模型不一致和不完整,阻碍了催产素作为产科以外的治疗药物的发展。本研究采用灵敏和特异的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC/MS)分析方法描述了静脉注射和鼻内注射催产素的人群血浆药代动力学。方法:在健康成年男性和非孕妇中进行两项研究,第一项研究在1或10分钟内静脉注射催产素16.7 μg,第二项研究在30分钟内静脉注射催产素13.7 μg,并在另一天鼻内注射催产素100 μg (n=24)。采用LC/MS和酶联免疫吸附法测定静脉血浆催产素浓度。采用NONMEM法估计药代动力学参数。结果:两室模型很好地描述了静脉注射催产素的药代动力学(0%的偏差,18%的中位误差)。鼻内催产素的双室模型的特点是受试者之间的差异很大(9%的中位偏差,47%的中位不准确性)。鼻腔催产素生物利用度为0.7%。LC/MS检测的催产素样品明显高于酶联免疫吸附法同时检测的样品。结论:静脉注射后叶催产素的药代动力学可以用双室模型很好地描述。低生物利用度(临床试验注册:NCT03929367(研究1)和NCT05672667(研究2))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure to minimise driving pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications in minimally invasive thoracic and abdominal surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of peripheral nerve blocks with increased postoperative pain and opioid use in orthopaedic surgery: are postoperative outcomes linked to rebound pain occurrence? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 1286-96. Personalised care and subgroup evidence: anticipated effects, exploratory models, and evidentiary standards. Difficult Airway Society 2025 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults. Response to Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 761-2. The Difficult Airway Society 2025 Guidelines Education Package: bridging the translational gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1