Prevalence of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1525609
Shijun Xia, Lijuan Ma, Hui Li, Yue Li, Linchong Yu
{"title":"Prevalence of enterotoxigenic <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shijun Xia, Lijuan Ma, Hui Li, Yue Li, Linchong Yu","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1525609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The gut microbiome, specifically enterotoxigenic <i>Bacteroides fragilis</i> (ETBF), has been reported to play a role in colorectal cancer development. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to compare the prevalence of ETBF in patients with colorectal cancer and healthy controls as well as in various stages of colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published until May 2024. We utilized studies either comparing the prevalence of ETBF in patients with colorectal cancer and healthy control or examining its prevalence across different stages of colorectal cancer. The prevalence of ETBF colonization in biological samples from individuals with colorectal cancer compared to that in healthy controls or adjacent normal tissue as well as the association between the prevalence of ETBF and various stages of colorectal cancer were plotted using a random-effect or fixed-effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen relevant articles were identified. Meta-analyses revealed that patients with colorectal cancer had a higher likelihood of having ETBF than healthy controls (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.98, I<sup>2</sup> = 55%). Additionally, ETBF detection was lower in stage I/II than in stage III/IV colorectal cancer (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.91, I<sup>2</sup> = 41%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The prevalence of ETBF was consistently higher in the tissue and fecal samples of patients with colorectal cancer than in those of controls. A difference in ETBF prevalence between stage I/II and stage III/IV colorectal cancer was noted, but further analysis revealed that the conclusion is unreliable.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD 42024548325.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1525609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1525609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The gut microbiome, specifically enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), has been reported to play a role in colorectal cancer development. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to compare the prevalence of ETBF in patients with colorectal cancer and healthy controls as well as in various stages of colorectal cancer.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published until May 2024. We utilized studies either comparing the prevalence of ETBF in patients with colorectal cancer and healthy control or examining its prevalence across different stages of colorectal cancer. The prevalence of ETBF colonization in biological samples from individuals with colorectal cancer compared to that in healthy controls or adjacent normal tissue as well as the association between the prevalence of ETBF and various stages of colorectal cancer were plotted using a random-effect or fixed-effect model.

Results: Fourteen relevant articles were identified. Meta-analyses revealed that patients with colorectal cancer had a higher likelihood of having ETBF than healthy controls (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.98, I2 = 55%). Additionally, ETBF detection was lower in stage I/II than in stage III/IV colorectal cancer (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.91, I2 = 41%).

Discussion: The prevalence of ETBF was consistently higher in the tissue and fecal samples of patients with colorectal cancer than in those of controls. A difference in ETBF prevalence between stage I/II and stage III/IV colorectal cancer was noted, but further analysis revealed that the conclusion is unreliable.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD 42024548325.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌患者肠道产毒素脆弱拟杆菌的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
肠道微生物群,特别是产肠毒素的脆弱拟杆菌(ETBF),已被报道在结直肠癌的发展中发挥作用。我们的目的是对已发表的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较结直肠癌患者和健康对照者以及不同阶段结直肠癌中ETBF的患病率。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,检索截止到2024年5月发表的研究。我们利用的研究要么比较了结直肠癌患者和健康对照者中ETBF的患病率,要么检查了其在结直肠癌不同阶段的患病率。使用随机效应或固定效应模型绘制了来自结直肠癌个体的生物样本中与健康对照或邻近正常组织中ETBF定殖的流行率以及ETBF流行率与结直肠癌不同阶段之间的关联。结果:共鉴定出14篇相关文献。荟萃分析显示,结直肠癌患者发生ETBF的可能性高于健康对照组(优势比[OR]: 2.54, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.63-3.98, I2 = 55%)。此外,I/II期结直肠癌的ETBF检出率低于III/IV期(OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.91, I2 = 41%)。讨论:在结直肠癌患者的组织和粪便样本中,ETBF的患病率始终高于对照组。注意到I/II期和III/IV期结直肠癌之间ETBF患病率的差异,但进一步分析显示该结论不可靠。系统评审注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD 42024548325。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
1817
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.
期刊最新文献
A conserved KL2-capsule-related phage-resistant mechanism in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is surmountable by a rationally selected dual-phage cocktail. Combined anti-PD-1 and amphotericin B therapy reduces fungal burden and enhances control of murine paracoccidioidomycosis. From fields to eyes: the epidemiology and immune challenges of fungal keratitis. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the genomic characterization and evolution of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Gansu, China. Towards precision management of Mycoplasma genitalium: a real-world cohort study identifying key predictors for treatment failure and the superiority of sequential therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1