Frequency and predictors of delayed clearance of prophylactic pancreatic stents after ERCP

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.638
Joshua Martin DO , Aisel Alikhanova MD , Wichit Srikureja MD , James L. Buxbaum MD , John J. Kim MD, MS
{"title":"Frequency and predictors of delayed clearance of prophylactic pancreatic stents after ERCP","authors":"Joshua Martin DO ,&nbsp;Aisel Alikhanova MD ,&nbsp;Wichit Srikureja MD ,&nbsp;James L. Buxbaum MD ,&nbsp;John J. Kim MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Timely evaluation and removal of prophylactic pancreatic stents (PSs) placed during ERCP are recommended. The aim of the study was to examine the proportion of patients whose prophylactic PSs passed or were removed within 4 weeks of ERCP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Consecutive patients who received ERCP with prophylactic PS placement (May 2014 to October 2022) at a tertiary center were identified. The primary endpoint was clearance of the PS ≤4 weeks from ERCP confirmed by </span>radiologic studies<span><span> or endoscopy. </span>Multivariate analysis was used to identify endoscopist-, patient-, and procedure-related factors associated with the primary endpoint.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 4724 patients undergoing ERCP, 262 (5.5%) received a prophylactic PS (mean age, 56.6 ± 18.5 years; 168 [64%] women). After ERCP, PSs were evaluated in ≤2 weeks in 177 patients (68%; 95% CI, 62-73). Furthermore, PSs were cleared at ≤4 weeks in 135 patients (52%; 95% CI, 46-58) by radiologic studies in 86 (33%) or endoscopic removal in 49 (19%). On multivariate analysis, biliary stent placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) reduced the odds of timely PS clearance after adjusting for endoscopist-specific clearance rates: top (aOR, 11.1; 95% CI, 4.0-30.5), second (aOR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.5-11.9), and third (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.9-9.0) compared with the bottom quartile. During follow-up of 20.1 ± 23.5 months, 47 of 127 patients (37%) with delayed PS clearance demonstrated a median stent dwelling time of 55 days (range, 29-929).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Prophylactic PSs were cleared within 4 weeks in only half of the patients after ERCP. In addition to primarily endoscopist-driven factors, biliary stent placement was associated with delayed clearance of prophylactic PSs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"102 6","pages":"Pages 845-851"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510725008077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Timely evaluation and removal of prophylactic pancreatic stents (PSs) placed during ERCP are recommended. The aim of the study was to examine the proportion of patients whose prophylactic PSs passed or were removed within 4 weeks of ERCP.

Methods

Consecutive patients who received ERCP with prophylactic PS placement (May 2014 to October 2022) at a tertiary center were identified. The primary endpoint was clearance of the PS ≤4 weeks from ERCP confirmed by radiologic studies or endoscopy. Multivariate analysis was used to identify endoscopist-, patient-, and procedure-related factors associated with the primary endpoint.

Results

Of 4724 patients undergoing ERCP, 262 (5.5%) received a prophylactic PS (mean age, 56.6 ± 18.5 years; 168 [64%] women). After ERCP, PSs were evaluated in ≤2 weeks in 177 patients (68%; 95% CI, 62-73). Furthermore, PSs were cleared at ≤4 weeks in 135 patients (52%; 95% CI, 46-58) by radiologic studies in 86 (33%) or endoscopic removal in 49 (19%). On multivariate analysis, biliary stent placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) reduced the odds of timely PS clearance after adjusting for endoscopist-specific clearance rates: top (aOR, 11.1; 95% CI, 4.0-30.5), second (aOR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.5-11.9), and third (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.9-9.0) compared with the bottom quartile. During follow-up of 20.1 ± 23.5 months, 47 of 127 patients (37%) with delayed PS clearance demonstrated a median stent dwelling time of 55 days (range, 29-929).

Conclusions

Prophylactic PSs were cleared within 4 weeks in only half of the patients after ERCP. In addition to primarily endoscopist-driven factors, biliary stent placement was associated with delayed clearance of prophylactic PSs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后预防性胰腺支架延迟清除的频率和预测因素。
背景和目的:建议在内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)中及时评估和移除预防性胰腺支架(PS)。该研究的目的是检查预防性PS通过或在ERCP 4周内移除的患者比例。方法:选取在三级中心连续接受ERCP并预防性PS的患者(2014年5月- 2022年11月)。主要终点是经放射学研究或内窥镜检查证实的ERCP清除PS≤4周。多变量分析用于确定与主要终点相关的内镜医师、患者和手术相关因素。结果:4724例ERCP患者中,262例(5.5%)接受了预防性PS(平均年龄56.6±18.5岁,168例(64%)女性)。在ERCP后,177例(68%,95%CI 62-73%)患者在≤2周内评估PS。此外,135例(52%,95%CI 46-58%)患者在≤4周时通过放射学检查(86例,33%)或内镜切除(49例,19%)清除了PS。在多因素分析中,胆道支架置入(AOR=0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8)在调整内镜专家特异性清除率后降低了PS清除率的几率:与最低四分位数相比,最高(AOR=11.1, 95%CI 4.0-30.5)、第二(AOR=5.4, 95%CI 2.5-11.9)和第三(AOR=4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.0)。在20.1±23.5个月的随访中,127例延迟PS清除的患者中有47例(37%)显示支架停留时间中位数为55天(范围29至929)。结论:只有一半的ERCP患者在4周内清除了预防性PS。除了主要的内镜驱动因素外,胆道支架置入与预防性PS清除延迟有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
ASGE consensus recommendations on the endoscopic management of eosinophilic esophagitis - part 2: disease assessment, monitoring, and pediatric considerations. REACT Multipoint Elastic Traction for Colorectal ESD: A Retrospective Single-Center Feasibility Series of 59 Consecutive Cases Technical Refinement in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein: Role of EUS-Guided Navigation (with video) Stenosis Development After Circumferential Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Analysis of Predictive Factors and Outcomes Endoscopic techniques for the identification of duodenal villous atrophy in celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1